| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | 2562 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2016-01-17 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | We want to use the type 'recipe' for recipe *variables*, because it seems nicer to say `recipe number -> number` rather than recipe-ordinal, etc. To support this we'll allow recipe names to be mentioned without any type. This might make a couple of places in this commit more brittle. I'm dropping error messages, causing them to not happen in some situations. Maybe I should just bite the bullet and require an explicit :recipe-literal. We'll see. | ||||
| * | 2561 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2016-01-17 | 1 | -0/+167 |
| Reorganize layers in preparation for a better, more type-safe implementation of first-class and higher-order recipes. | |||||