| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This way when you pass one end to a function or routine, you can
implicitly give it the right to either read or write the channel, but
not both.
The cost: code gets more convoluted, names get more convoluted. You can
see this in particular in the test for buffer-lines. Let's see how it
goes..
|
| |
|
|
| |
Arrange for tests to run multiple variants of channel functions.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Finally..
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
*Really* make channels generic. I'd fixed all the call sites in 2785,
but forgotten to actually switch the declaration. It works though;
generics working smoothly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
I've ignored Mu's concurrency primitives for a while, but they're
starting to return to front-and-center as I work on the file system
interfaces.
|
| |
|