about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/cpp
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 945 - move 'transform' layer to before 'run'Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-1713-10/+64
|
* 944 - more break/loop testsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-177-3/+257
| | | | I still can't handle jumps to labels. That'll require some rejiggering..
* 943Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-174-0/+123
|
* 942Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-171-3/+4
|
* 941 - c++: basic break/loop conversionKartik K. Agaram2015-03-1656-2/+373
|
* 940 - c++: some changes to instruction modelKartik K. Agaram2015-03-1660-366/+383
|
* 939 - c++: fix an old parsing hackKartik K. Agaram2015-03-168-15/+81
|
* 938Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-162-8/+10
|
* 937Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-161-2/+4
|
* 936Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-162-12/+10
|
* 935 - permit '{' and '}' as legal labelsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-162-5/+4
|
* 934 - extensible transform framework for mu's lightweight toolsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-163-0/+38
|
* 933Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-161-0/+2
|
* 932 - clean up comments in the tangled c++Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-1613-201/+223
|
* 931Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-162-0/+13
|
* 930Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-162-6/+8
|
* 929 - recipes again take ingredients and reply with resultsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-154-7/+84
|
* 928 - 'call' layer is now more cohesiveKartik K. Agaram2015-03-154-107/+76
| | | | It does less though. Args temporarily not supported.
* 927Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-151-1/+3
|
* 926Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-152-4/+2
|
* 925Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-142-1/+3
|
* 924Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-143-7/+11
|
* 923Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-4/+2
|
* 922Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-142-11/+10
|
* 921Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-143-27/+20
|
* 920Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-1/+1
|
* 919 - c++: run .mu files from commandlineKartik K. Agaram2015-03-143-4/+29
|
* 918Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-1/+1
|
* 917Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-0/+6
|
* 916Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-1/+1
|
* 915Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-1/+4
|
* 914Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-6/+6
|
* 913Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-47/+31
|
* 912 - tangle: another directive 'following' for nested patternsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-142-6/+39
|
* 911Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-11/+11
|
* 910 - c++: call layer more coherentKartik K. Agaram2015-03-142-16/+20
|
* 909Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-1/+1
|
* 908 - tangle: support nested patternsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-142-0/+27
|
* 907 - fix old tangle testsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-10/+10
|
* 904 - c++: replying from recipesKartik K. Agaram2015-03-145-2/+73
|
* 903Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-141-0/+2
|
* 902: c++: calling recipes with ingredientsKartik K. Agaram2015-03-144-8/+62
|
* 901Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-137-1/+24
|
* 900 - c++: calling 'recipes'Kartik K. Agaram2015-03-134-8/+53
|
* 896 - c++: routineKartik K. Agaram2015-03-121-11/+20
|
* 833Kartik K. Agaram2015-02-251-6/+4
|
* 832 - call-stack for C++ versionKartik K. Agaram2015-02-2554-173/+203
| | | | | | | | | | These #defines and references now span many different layers. Let's see if the lack of encapsulation causes problems. Also interesting to run into a case where I need to modify a foundational layer and touch every single scenario/trace. Only alternative was to duplicate all the different layers that add instructions. Sign of problems with this model?
* 824Kartik K. Agaram2015-02-221-1/+1
|
* 823Kartik K. Agaram2015-02-223-0/+154
|
* 822Kartik K. Agaram2015-02-221-1/+0
|
generated by cgit-pink 1.4.1-2-gfad0 (git 2.36.2.497.gbbea4dcf42) at 2024-11-30 16:21:24 +0000