| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | . | Kartik Agaram | 2019-07-01 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 5059 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-04-05 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | 5037 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-03-29 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4981 - no, go back to 3 phases | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-18 | 1 | -7/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Considering how much trouble a merge phase would be (commit 4978), it seems simpler to just add the extra syntax for controlling the entry point of the generated ELF binary. But I wouldn't have noticed this if I hadn't taken the time to write out the commit messages of 4976 and 4978. Even if we happened to already have linked list primitives built, this may still be a good idea considering that I'm saving quite a lot of code in duplicated entrypoints. | ||||
| * | 4961 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-14 | 1 | -3/+3 |
| | | |||||
| * | 4950 | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-03 | 1 | -0/+809 |