From 95f2fe96262fcc5977c4633828730acc588c99b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kartik K. Agaram" <vc@akkartik.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:44:46 -0800
Subject: 3742 - move instruction.old_name to a later layer

The drawback of this is that we forget to initialize old_name when we
create instructions out of whole cloth in a few places. But this problem
already existed..
---
 010vm.cc | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

(limited to '010vm.cc')

diff --git a/010vm.cc b/010vm.cc
index b35d39d8..fea11a50 100644
--- a/010vm.cc
+++ b/010vm.cc
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ struct instruction {
   bool is_label;
   string label;  // only if is_label
   string name;  // only if !is_label
-  string old_name;  // before our automatic rewrite rules
   string original_string;  // for error messages
   recipe_ordinal operation;  // get(Recipe_ordinal, name)
   vector<reagent> ingredients;  // only if !is_label
@@ -266,7 +265,6 @@ void instruction::clear() {
   is_label=false;
   label.clear();
   name.clear();
-  old_name.clear();
   operation=IDLE;
   ingredients.clear();
   products.clear();
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0