From 6c1376f8307a3c7b98dfd5ef09670bd15c05f399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Kartik K. Agaram" Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 23:21:48 -0700 Subject: 2095 Finally terminate the experiment of keeping debug prints around. I'm also going to give up on maintaining counts. What we really need is two kinds of tracing: a) For tests, just the domain-specific facts, organized by labels. b) For debugging, just transient dumps to stdout. b) only works if stdout is clean by default. Hmm, I think this means 'stash' should be the transient kind of trace. --- 052tangle.cc | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to '052tangle.cc') diff --git a/052tangle.cc b/052tangle.cc index 3392acbf..c6e9edbb 100644 --- a/052tangle.cc +++ b/052tangle.cc @@ -32,13 +32,11 @@ Fragments_used.clear(); else if (command == "before") { string label = next_word(in); recipe tmp = slurp_recipe(in); -//? cerr << "adding before fragment " << label << '\n'; //? 1 Before_fragments[label].steps.insert(Before_fragments[label].steps.end(), tmp.steps.begin(), tmp.steps.end()); } else if (command == "after") { string label = next_word(in); recipe tmp = slurp_recipe(in); -//? cerr << "adding after fragment " << label << '\n'; //? 1 After_fragments[label].steps.insert(After_fragments[label].steps.begin(), tmp.steps.begin(), tmp.steps.end()); } @@ -72,12 +70,10 @@ void insert_fragments(const recipe_ordinal r) { made_progress = true; Fragments_used.insert(inst.label); if (Before_fragments.find(inst.label) != Before_fragments.end()) { -//? cerr << "loading code before " << inst.label << '\n'; //? 1 result.insert(result.end(), Before_fragments[inst.label].steps.begin(), Before_fragments[inst.label].steps.end()); } result.push_back(inst); if (After_fragments.find(inst.label) != After_fragments.end()) { -//? cerr << "loading code after " << inst.label << '\n'; //? 1 result.insert(result.end(), After_fragments[inst.label].steps.begin(), After_fragments[inst.label].steps.end()); } } -- cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0