From 3c4c9c08071b55a45bfe99a5609cab48d9013b31 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kartik K. Agaram" <vc@akkartik.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:07:16 -0800
Subject: 3744

Undo 3743. Really any time we create new instructions from whole cloth
during rewriting or transform, the whole notion of 'original name' goes
out the window. Pointless trying to fight that fact of life.
---
 010vm.cc                          | 1 -
 043space.cc                       | 4 ----
 053recipe_header.cc               | 2 +-
 060rewrite_literal_string.cc      | 2 +-
 062convert_ingredients_to_text.cc | 4 ++--
 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/010vm.cc b/010vm.cc
index 80a817f3..fea11a50 100644
--- a/010vm.cc
+++ b/010vm.cc
@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ struct instruction {
   instruction();
   void clear();
   bool is_empty();
-  // End instruction Methods
 };
 
 :(before "struct instruction")
diff --git a/043space.cc b/043space.cc
index 46736615..33c4bb09 100644
--- a/043space.cc
+++ b/043space.cc
@@ -266,10 +266,6 @@ string old_name;
 old_name.clear();
 :(before "End next_instruction(curr)")
 curr->old_name = curr->name;  // before rewrite rules modify it
-:(before "End instruction Methods")
-void initialize_name(const string& n) {
-  name = old_name = n;
-}
 
 :(code)
 // is this reagent one of the values returned by the current (return) instruction?
diff --git a/053recipe_header.cc b/053recipe_header.cc
index 7101d7d6..c8904ba3 100644
--- a/053recipe_header.cc
+++ b/053recipe_header.cc
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void fill_in_return_ingredients(const recipe_ordinal r) {
   const instruction& final_instruction = caller_recipe.steps.at(SIZE(caller_recipe.steps)-1);
   if (final_instruction.name != "reply" && final_instruction.name != "return") {
     instruction inst;
-    inst.initialize_name("return");
+    inst.name = "return";
     add_header_products(inst, caller_recipe);
     caller_recipe.steps.push_back(inst);
   }
diff --git a/060rewrite_literal_string.cc b/060rewrite_literal_string.cc
index 1cd27a8b..3310bf9d 100644
--- a/060rewrite_literal_string.cc
+++ b/060rewrite_literal_string.cc
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ void rewrite_literal_string_to_text(const recipe_ordinal r) {
         instruction def;
         ostringstream ingredient_name;
         ingredient_name << inst.name << '_' << i << '_' << j << ":text";
-        def.initialize_name("new");
+        def.name = "new";
         def.ingredients.push_back(inst.ingredients.at(j));
         def.products.push_back(reagent(ingredient_name.str()));
         new_instructions.push_back(def);
diff --git a/062convert_ingredients_to_text.cc b/062convert_ingredients_to_text.cc
index fbdcc4ec..94ff5df3 100644
--- a/062convert_ingredients_to_text.cc
+++ b/062convert_ingredients_to_text.cc
@@ -115,13 +115,13 @@ void convert_ingredient_to_text(reagent& r, vector<instruction>& out, const stri
   if (is_static_array(r)) return;
   instruction def;
   if (is_lookup_of_address_of_array(r)) {
-    def.initialize_name("array-to-text-line");
+    def.name = "array-to-text-line";
     reagent/*copy*/ tmp = r;
     drop_one_lookup(tmp);
     def.ingredients.push_back(tmp);
   }
   else {
-    def.initialize_name("to-text-line");
+    def.name = "to-text-line";
     def.ingredients.push_back(r);
   }
   def.products.push_back(reagent(tmp_var));
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0