From f4fb198af313a3a30400ba1a51e0f0425b1da0ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kartik Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 15:46:36 -0700
Subject: 6790 experiment: explicit flush

tile is already visibly slow (49x212 screen) :/ So programmer needs more
control over performance.

But this may not be the right approach. That extra flush-stdout in tui.mu
suggests it's either going to be finicky, or we have to flush on every
attribute change. And going through a buffered-file may be slower. May.
---
 apps/tile/main.mu | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'apps/tile/main.mu')

diff --git a/apps/tile/main.mu b/apps/tile/main.mu
index 7c7065fc..a9d62bb4 100644
--- a/apps/tile/main.mu
+++ b/apps/tile/main.mu
@@ -75,4 +75,5 @@ fn render screen: (addr screen), buf: (addr gap-buffer) {
   move-cursor screen, start-row, start-col
   #
   render-gap-buffer screen, buf
+  flush-stdout
 }
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0