From 83d8299d2d966c39b4970828ff5743a5b05e3287 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Kartik K. Agaram" <vc@akkartik.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:15:03 -0800
Subject: 2562

We want to use the type 'recipe' for recipe *variables*, because it
seems nicer to say `recipe number -> number` rather than recipe-ordinal,
etc. To support this we'll allow recipe names to be mentioned without
any type.

This might make a couple of places in this commit more brittle. I'm
dropping error messages, causing them to not happen in some situations.
Maybe I should just bite the bullet and require an explicit
:recipe-literal. We'll see.
---
 fork.mu | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'fork.mu')

diff --git a/fork.mu b/fork.mu
index 1d717181..3aa37227 100644
--- a/fork.mu
+++ b/fork.mu
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 # example program: running multiple routines
 
 recipe main [
-  start-running thread2:recipe
+  start-running thread2
   {
     $print 34
     loop
-- 
cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0