//: Mu scenarios. This will get long, but these are the tests we want to //: support in this layer. //: You can use variable names in scenarios, but for the most part we'll use //: raw location numbers, because that lets us make assertions on memory. //: Tests should avoid abstraction as far as possible. :(scenarios run_mu_scenario) :(scenario scenario_block) scenario foo [ run [ 1:number <- copy 13 ] memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 13 ] ] # checks are inside scenario :(scenario scenario_multiple_blocks) scenario foo [ run [ 1:number <- copy 13 ] memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 13 ] run [ 2:number <- copy 13 ] memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 13 2 <- 13 ] ] :(scenario scenario_check_memory_and_trace) scenario foo [ run [ 1:number <- copy 13 trace 1, [a], [a b c] ] memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 13 ] trace-should-contain [ a: a b c ] trace-should-not-contain [ a: x y z ] ] //:: Core data structure :(before "End Types") struct scenario { string name; string to_run; }; :(before "End Globals") vector Scenarios; set Scenario_names; //:: Parse the 'scenario' form. //: Simply store the text of the scenario. :(before "End Command Handlers") else if (command == "scenario") { Scenarios.push_back(parse_scenario(in)); } :(code) scenario parse_scenario(istream& in) { scenario result; result.name = next_word(in); if (contains_key(Scenario_names, result.name)) raise << "duplicate scenario name: " << result.name << '\n' << end(); Scenario_names.insert(result.name); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); assert(in.peek() == '['); // scenarios are take special 'code' strings so we need to ignore brackets // inside comments result.to_run = slurp_quoted(in); // delete [] delimiters assert(result.to_run.at(0) == '['); result.to_run.erase(0, 1); assert(result.to_run.at(SIZE(result.to_run)-1) == ']'); result.to_run.erase(SIZE(result.to_run)-1); return result; } :(scenario read_scenario_with_bracket_in_comment) scenario foo [ # ']' in comment 1:number <- copy 0 ] +run: {1: "number"} <- copy {0: "literal"} :(scenario read_scenario_with_bracket_in_comment_in_nested_string) scenario foo [ 1:address:shared:array:character <- new [# not a comment] ] +run: {1: ("address" "shared" "array" "character")} <- new {"# not a comment": "literal-string"} //:: Run scenarios when we run 'mu test'. //: Treat the text of the scenario as a regular series of instructions. :(before "End Globals") int Num_core_mu_tests = 0; :(after "Check For .mu Files") Num_core_mu_tests = SIZE(Scenarios); :(before "End Tests") Hide_missing_default_space_errors = false; time_t mu_time; time(&mu_time); cerr << "\nMu tests: " << ctime(&mu_time); for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(Scenarios); ++i) { //? cerr << i << ": " << Scenarios.at(i).name << '\n'; if (i == Num_core_mu_tests) { time(&t); cerr << "\nApp tests: " << ctime(&t); } run_mu_scenario(Scenarios.at(i)); if (Passed) cerr << "."; } //: Convenience: run a single named scenario. :(after "Test Runs") for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(Scenarios); ++i) { if (Scenarios.at(i).name == argv[argc-1]) { run_mu_scenario(Scenarios.at(i)); if (Passed) cerr << ".\n"; return 0; } } :(before "End Globals") const scenario* Current_scenario = NULL; :(code) void run_mu_scenario(const scenario& s) { Current_scenario = &s; bool not_already_inside_test = !Trace_stream; //? cerr << s.name << '\n'; if (not_already_inside_test) { Trace_file = s.name; Trace_stream = new trace_stream; setup(); } vector tmp = load("recipe scenario_"+s.name+" [ "+s.to_run+" ]"); bind_special_scenario_names(tmp.at(0)); transform_all(); run(tmp.front()); if (Passed && !Hide_errors && trace_count("error") > 0) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } // End Mu Test Teardown if (not_already_inside_test && Trace_stream) { teardown(); ofstream fout((Trace_dir+Trace_file).c_str()); fout << Trace_stream->readable_contents(""); fout.close(); delete Trace_stream; Trace_stream = NULL; Trace_file = ""; } Current_scenario = NULL; } //: Watch out for redefinitions of scenario routines. We should never ever be //: doing that, regardless of anything else. :(scenarios run) :(scenario forbid_redefining_scenario_even_if_forced) % Hide_errors = true; % Disable_redefine_checks = true; def scenario-foo [ 1:number <- copy 34 ] def scenario-foo [ 1:number <- copy 35 ] +error: redefining recipe scenario-foo :(after "bool should_check_for_redefine(const string& recipe_name)") if (recipe_name.find("scenario-") == 0) return true; //:: The special instructions we want to support inside scenarios. //: In a compiler for the mu VM these will require more work. //: 'run' interprets a string as a set of instructions :(scenario run) def main [ run [ 1:number <- copy 13 ] ] +mem: storing 13 in location 1 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") RUN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "run", RUN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case RUN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case RUN: { assert(Name[Next_recipe_ordinal].empty()); ostringstream tmp; tmp << "recipe run_" << Next_recipe_ordinal << " [ " << current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name << " ]"; vector tmp_recipe = load(tmp.str()); bind_special_scenario_names(tmp_recipe.at(0)); transform_all(); if (Trace_stream) { ++Trace_stream->callstack_depth; trace(9998, "trace") << "run: incrementing callstack depth to " << Trace_stream->callstack_depth << end(); assert(Trace_stream->callstack_depth < 9000); // 9998-101 plus cushion } Current_routine->calls.push_front(call(tmp_recipe.at(0))); continue; // not done with caller; don't increment current_step_index() } // Some variables for fake resources always get special addresses in // scenarios. :(code) void bind_special_scenario_names(recipe_ordinal r) { // Special Scenario Variable Names(r) // End Special Scenario Variable Names(r) } :(scenario run_multiple) def main [ run [ 1:number <- copy 13 ] run [ 2:number <- copy 13 ] ] +mem: storing 13 in location 1 +mem: storing 13 in location 2 //: 'memory-should-contain' raises errors if specific locations aren't as expected //: Also includes some special support for checking strings. :(before "End Globals") bool Scenario_testing_scenario = false; :(before "End Setup") Scenario_testing_scenario = false; :(scenario memory_check) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 13 ] ] +run: checking location 1 +error: expected location 1 to contain 13 but saw 0 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "memory-should-contain", MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_memory(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) void check_memory(const string& s) { istringstream in(s); in >> std::noskipws; set locations_checked; while (true) { skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); if (!has_data(in)) break; string lhs = next_word(in); if (!is_integer(lhs)) { check_type(lhs, in); continue; } int address = to_integer(lhs); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _assign; in >> _assign; assert(_assign == "<-"); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string rhs = next_word(in); if (!is_integer(rhs) && !is_noninteger(rhs)) { if (Current_scenario && !Scenario_testing_scenario) // genuine test in a mu file raise << "\nF - " << Current_scenario->name << ": location " << address << " can't contain non-number " << rhs << '\n' << end(); else // just testing scenario support raise << "location " << address << " can't contain non-number " << rhs << '\n' << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } return; } double value = to_double(rhs); if (contains_key(locations_checked, address)) raise << "duplicate expectation for location " << address << '\n' << end(); trace(9999, "run") << "checking location " << address << end(); if (get_or_insert(Memory, address) != value) { if (Current_scenario && !Scenario_testing_scenario) { // genuine test in a mu file raise << "\nF - " << Current_scenario->name << ": expected location " << address << " to contain " << no_scientific(value) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address)) << '\n' << end(); } else { // just testing scenario support raise << "expected location " << address << " to contain " << no_scientific(value) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address)) << '\n' << end(); } if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } return; } locations_checked.insert(address); } } void check_type(const string& lhs, istream& in) { reagent x(lhs); if (x.type->name == "array" && x.type->right && x.type->right->name == "character" && !x.type->right->right) { x.set_value(to_integer(x.name)); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _assign = next_word(in); assert(_assign == "<-"); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string literal = next_word(in); int address = x.value; // exclude quoting brackets assert(*literal.begin() == '['); literal.erase(literal.begin()); assert(*--literal.end() == ']'); literal.erase(--literal.end()); check_string(address, literal); return; } // End Scenario Type Cases raise << "don't know how to check memory for " << lhs << '\n' << end(); } void check_string(int address, const string& literal) { trace(9999, "run") << "checking string length at " << address << end(); if (get_or_insert(Memory, address) != SIZE(literal)) { if (Current_scenario && !Scenario_testing_scenario) raise << "\nF - " << Current_scenario->name << ": expected location " << address << " to contain length " << SIZE(literal) << " of string [" << literal << "] but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address)) << " (" << read_mu_string(address) << ")\n" << end(); else raise << "expected location " << address << " to contain length " << SIZE(literal) << " of string [" << literal << "] but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address)) << '\n' << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } return; } ++address; // now skip length for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(literal); ++i) { trace(9999, "run") << "checking location " << address+i << end(); if (get_or_insert(Memory, address+i) != literal.at(i)) { if (Current_scenario && !Scenario_testing_scenario) { // genuine test in a mu file raise << "\nF - " << Current_scenario->name << ": expected location " << (address+i) << " to contain " << literal.at(i) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address+i)) << " ('" << static_cast(get_or_insert(Memory, address+i)) << "')\n" << end(); } else { // just testing scenario support raise << "expected location " << (address+i) << " to contain " << literal.at(i) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address+i)) << '\n' << end(); } if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } return; } } } :(scenario memory_check_multiple) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 0 1 <- 0 ] ] +error: duplicate expectation for location 1 :(scenario memory_check_string_length) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ 1:number <- copy 3 2:number <- copy 97 # 'a' 3:number <- copy 98 # 'b' 4:number <- copy 99 # 'c' memory-should-contain [ 1:array:character <- [ab] ] ] +error: expected location 1 to contain length 2 of string [ab] but saw 3 :(scenario memory_check_string) def main [ 1:number <- copy 3 2:number <- copy 97 # 'a' 3:number <- copy 98 # 'b' 4:number <- copy 99 # 'c' memory-should-contain [ 1:array:character <- [abc] ] ] +run: checking string length at 1 +run: checking location 2 +run: checking location 3 +run: checking location 4 :(scenario memory_invalid_string_check) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ memory-should-contain [ 1 <- [abc] ] ] +error: location 1 can't contain non-number [abc] :(scenario memory_check_with_comment) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ memory-should-contain [ 1 <- 34 # comment ] ] -error: location 1 can't contain non-number 34 # comment # but there'll be an error signalled by memory-should-contain :(code) //: 'trace-should-contain' is like the '+' lines in our scenarios so far // Like runs of contiguous '+' lines, order is important. The trace checks // that the lines are present *and* in the specified sequence. (There can be // other lines in between.) :(scenario trace_check_fails) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ trace-should-contain [ a: b a: d ] ] +error: missing [b] in trace with label a :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "trace-should-contain", TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_trace(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) // simplified version of check_trace_contents() that emits errors rather // than just printing to stderr void check_trace(const string& expected) { Trace_stream->newline(); vector expected_lines = parse_trace(expected); if (expected_lines.empty()) return; int curr_expected_line = 0; for (vector::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) { if (expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).label != p->label) continue; if (expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).contents != trim(p->contents)) continue; // match ++curr_expected_line; if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return; } raise << "missing [" << expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).contents << "] " << "in trace with label " << expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).label << '\n' << end(); Passed = false; } vector parse_trace(const string& expected) { vector buf = split(expected, "\n"); vector result; for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(buf); ++i) { buf.at(i) = trim(buf.at(i)); if (buf.at(i).empty()) continue; int delim = buf.at(i).find(": "); result.push_back(trace_line(trim(buf.at(i).substr(0, delim)), trim(buf.at(i).substr(delim+2)))); } return result; } :(scenario trace_check_fails_in_nonfirst_line) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [b] ] trace-should-contain [ a: b a: d ] ] +error: missing [d] in trace with label a :(scenario trace_check_passes_silently) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [b] ] trace-should-contain [ a: b ] ] -error: missing [b] in trace with label a $error: 0 //: 'trace-should-not-contain' is like the '-' lines in our scenarios so far //: Each trace line is separately checked for absense. Order is *not* //: important, so you can't say things like "B should not exist after A." :(scenario trace_negative_check_fails) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [b] ] trace-should-not-contain [ a: b ] ] +error: unexpected [b] in trace with label a :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "trace-should-not-contain", TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_trace_missing(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) // simplified version of check_trace_contents() that emits errors rather // than just printing to stderr bool check_trace_missing(const string& in) { Trace_stream->newline(); vector lines = parse_trace(in); for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(lines); ++i) { if (trace_count(lines.at(i).label, lines.at(i).contents) != 0) { raise << "unexpected [" << lines.at(i).contents << "] in trace with label " << lines.at(i).label << '\n' << end(); Passed = false; return false; } } return true; } :(scenario trace_negative_check_passes_silently) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; def main [ trace-should-not-contain [ a: b ] ] -error: unexpected [b] in trace with label a $error: 0 :(scenario trace_negative_check_fails_on_any_unexpected_line) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [d] ] trace-should-not-contain [ a: b a: d ] ] +error: unexpected [d] in trace with label a :(scenario trace_count_check) def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [foo] ] check-trace-count-for-label 1, [a] ] :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "check-trace-count-for-label", CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL: { if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 2) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'check-trace-for-label' requires exactly two ingredients, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'check-trace-for-label' should be a number (count), but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end(); break; } if (!is_literal_string(inst.ingredients.at(1))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'check-trace-for-label' should be a literal string (label), but got " << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << '\n' << end(); break; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL: { if (!Passed) break; int expected_count = ingredients.at(0).at(0); string label = current_instruction().ingredients.at(1).name; int count = trace_count(label); if (count != expected_count) { if (Current_scenario && !Scenario_testing_scenario) { // genuine test in a mu file raise << "\nF - " << Current_scenario->name << ": " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected " << expected_count << " lines in trace with label " << label << " in trace: " << end(); DUMP(label); } else { // just testing scenario support raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected " << expected_count << " lines in trace with label " << label << " in trace\n" << end(); } if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) { Passed = false; ++Num_failures; } } break; } :(scenario trace_count_check_2) % Scenario_testing_scenario = true; % Hide_errors = true; def main [ run [ trace 1, [a], [foo] ] check-trace-count-for-label 2, [a] ] +error: main: expected 2 lines in trace with label a in trace //: Minor detail: ignore 'system' calls in scenarios, since anything we do //: with them is by definition impossible to test through mu. :(after "case _SYSTEM:") if (Current_scenario) break; //:: Helpers :(code) // just for the scenarios running scenarios in C++ layers void run_mu_scenario(const string& form) { Scenario_names.clear(); istringstream in(form); in >> std::noskipws; skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _scenario = next_word(in); assert(_scenario == "scenario"); scenario s = parse_scenario(in); run_mu_scenario(s); }