1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
|
//: The goal of this skeleton is to make programs more easy to understand and
//: more malleable, easy to rewrite in radical ways without accidentally
//: breaking some corner case. Tests further both goals. They help
//: understandability by letting one make small changes and get feedback. What
//: if I wrote this line like so? What if I removed this function call, is it
//: really necessary? Just try it, see if the tests pass. Want to explore
//: rewriting this bit in this way? Tests put many refactorings on a firmer
//: footing.
//:
//: But the usual way we write tests seems incomplete. Refactorings tend to
//: work in the small, but don't help with changes to function boundaries. If
//: you want to extract a new function you have to manually test-drive it to
//: create tests for it. If you want to inline a function its tests are no
//: longer valid. In both cases you end up having to reorganize code as well as
//: tests, an error-prone activity.
//:
//: This file tries to fix this problem by supporting domain-driven testing
//: We try to focus on the domain of inputs the program should work on. All
//: tests invoke the program in a single way: by calling run() with different
//: inputs. The program operates on the input and logs _facts_ it deduces to a
//: trace:
//: trace("label") << "fact 1: " << val;
//:
//: The tests check for facts:
//: :(scenario foo)
//: 34 # call run() with this input
//: +label: fact 1: 34 # trace should have logged this at the end
//: -label: fact 1: 35 # trace should never contain such a line
//:
//: Since we never call anything but the run() function directly, we never have
//: to rewrite the tests when we reorganize the internals of the program. We
//: just have to make sure our rewrite deduces the same facts about the domain,
//: and that's something we're going to have to do anyway.
//:
//: To avoid the combinatorial explosion of integration tests, we organize the
//: program into different layers, and each fact is logged to the trace with a
//: specific label. Individual tests can focus on specific labels. In essence,
//: validating the facts logged with a specific label is identical to calling
//: some internal subsystem.
//:
//: Traces interact salubriously with layers. Thanks to our ordering
//: directives, each layer can contain its own tests. They may rely on other
//: layers, but when a test fails its usually due to breakage in the same
//: layer. When multiple tests fail, it's usually useful to debug the very
//: first test to fail. This is in contrast with the traditional approach,
//: where changes can cause breakages in faraway subsystems, and picking the
//: right test to debug can be an important skill to pick up.
//:
//: To build robust tests, trace facts about your domain rather than details of
//: how you computed them.
//:
//: More details: http://akkartik.name/blog/tracing-tests
//:
//: ---
//:
//: Between layers and domain-driven testing, programming starts to look like a
//: fundamentally different activity. Instead of a) superficial, b) local rules
//: on c) code [like http://blog.bbv.ch/2013/06/05/clean-code-cheat-sheet],
//: we allow programmers to engage with the a) deep, b) global structure of the
//: c) domain. If you can systematically track discontinuities in the domain
//: you don't care if the code used gotos as long as it passed the tests. If
//: tests become more robust to run it becomes easier to try out radically
//: different implementations for the same program. If code is super-easy to
//: rewrite, it becomes less important what indentation style it uses, or that
//: the objects are appropriately encapsulated, or that the functions are
//: referentially transparent.
//:
//: Instead of plumbing, programming becomes building and gradually refining a
//: map of the environment the program must operate under. Whether a program is
//: 'correct' at a given point in time is a red herring; what matters is
//: avoiding regression by monotonically nailing down the more 'eventful' parts
//: of the terrain. It helps readers new and old and rewards curiosity to
//: organize large programs in self-similar hiearchies of example scenarios
//: colocated with the code that makes them work.
//:
//: "Programming properly should be regarded as an activity by which
//: programmers form a mental model, rather than as production of a program."
//: -- Peter Naur (http://alistair.cockburn.us/ASD+book+extract%3A+%22Naur,+Ehn,+Musashi%22)
:(before "int main")
// End Tracing // hack to ensure most code in this layer comes before anything else
:(before "End Tracing")
bool Hide_warnings = false;
:(before "End Setup")
//? cerr << "AAA setup\n"; //? 2
Hide_warnings = false;
:(before "End Types")
struct trace_line {
string label;
string contents;
trace_line(string l, string c) :label(l), contents(c) {}
};
:(before "End Tracing")
struct trace_stream {
vector<trace_line> past_lines;
// accumulator for current line
ostringstream* curr_stream;
string curr_layer;
string dump_layer;
trace_stream() :curr_stream(NULL) {}
~trace_stream() { if (curr_stream) delete curr_stream; }
ostringstream& stream(string layer) {
newline();
curr_stream = new ostringstream;
curr_layer = layer;
return *curr_stream;
}
// be sure to call this before messing with curr_stream or curr_layer
void newline() {
if (!curr_stream) return;
string curr_contents = curr_stream->str();
past_lines.push_back(trace_line(trim(curr_layer), curr_contents)); // preserve indent in contents
if (curr_layer == dump_layer || curr_layer == "dump" || dump_layer == "all" ||
(!Hide_warnings && curr_layer == "warn"))
//? if (dump_layer == "all" && (Current_routine->id == 3 || curr_layer == "schedule")) //? 1
cerr << curr_layer << ": " << curr_contents << '\n';
delete curr_stream;
curr_stream = NULL;
}
// Useful for debugging.
string readable_contents(string layer) { // missing layer = everything
newline();
ostringstream output;
layer = trim(layer);
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = past_lines.begin(); p != past_lines.end(); ++p)
if (layer.empty() || layer == p->label) {
output << p->label << ": " << p->contents << '\n';
}
return output.str();
}
};
trace_stream* Trace_stream = NULL;
// Top-level helper. IMPORTANT: can't nest.
#define trace(layer) !Trace_stream ? cerr /*print nothing*/ : Trace_stream->stream(layer)
// Warnings should go straight to cerr by default since calls to trace() have
// some unfriendly constraints (they delay printing, they can't nest)
#define raise ((!Trace_stream || !Hide_warnings) ? cerr /*do print*/ : Trace_stream->stream("warn"))
// A separate helper for debugging. We should only trace domain-specific
// facts. For everything else use log.
#define xlog if (false) log
// To turn on logging replace 'xlog' with 'log'.
#define log cerr
:(before "End Types")
// raise << die exits after printing -- unless Hide_warnings is set.
struct die {};
:(before "End Tracing")
ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, unused die) {
if (Hide_warnings) return os;
os << "dying";
if (Trace_stream) Trace_stream->newline();
exit(1);
}
#define CLEAR_TRACE delete Trace_stream, Trace_stream = new trace_stream;
#define DUMP(layer) if (Trace_stream) cerr << Trace_stream->readable_contents(layer);
// Trace_stream is a resource, lease_tracer uses RAII to manage it.
string Trace_file;
static string Trace_dir = ".traces/";
struct lease_tracer {
lease_tracer() { Trace_stream = new trace_stream; }
~lease_tracer() {
//? cerr << "write to file? " << Trace_file << "$\n"; //? 2
if (!Trace_file.empty()) {
//? cerr << "writing\n"; //? 2
ofstream fout((Trace_dir+Trace_file).c_str());
fout << Trace_stream->readable_contents("");
fout.close();
}
delete Trace_stream, Trace_stream = NULL, Trace_file = "";
}
};
// To transparently save traces, start tests with the TEST() macro.
#define TEST(name) void test_##name() { Trace_file = #name;
#define START_TRACING_UNTIL_END_OF_SCOPE lease_tracer leased_tracer;
:(before "End Test Setup")
START_TRACING_UNTIL_END_OF_SCOPE
//? Trace_stream->dump_layer = "all"; //? 1
#define CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(...) check_trace_contents(__FUNCTION__, __FILE__, __LINE__, __VA_ARGS__)
:(before "End Tracing")
bool check_trace_contents(string FUNCTION, string FILE, int LINE, string expected) { // missing layer == anywhere
vector<string> expected_lines = split(expected, "");
long long int curr_expected_line = 0;
while (curr_expected_line < SIZE(expected_lines) && expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).empty())
++curr_expected_line;
if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return true;
Trace_stream->newline();
string layer, contents;
split_layer_contents(expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line), &layer, &contents);
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) {
//? cerr << "AAA " << layer << ' ' << p->label << '\n'; //? 1
if (layer != p->label)
continue;
//? cerr << "BBB ^" << contents << "$ ^" << p->contents << "$\n"; //? 1
if (contents != trim(p->contents))
continue;
//? cerr << "CCC\n"; //? 1
++curr_expected_line;
while (curr_expected_line < SIZE(expected_lines) && expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).empty())
++curr_expected_line;
if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return true;
split_layer_contents(expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line), &layer, &contents);
}
++Num_failures;
cerr << "\nF - " << FUNCTION << "(" << FILE << ":" << LINE << "): missing [" << contents << "] in trace:\n";
DUMP(layer);
//? exit(0); //? 1
Passed = false;
return false;
}
void split_layer_contents(const string& s, string* layer, string* contents) {
static const string delim(": ");
size_t pos = s.find(delim);
if (pos == string::npos) {
*layer = "";
*contents = trim(s);
}
else {
*layer = trim(s.substr(0, pos));
*contents = trim(s.substr(pos+SIZE(delim)));
}
}
int trace_count(string layer) {
return trace_count(layer, "");
}
int trace_count(string layer, string line) {
Trace_stream->newline();
long result = 0;
for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) {
if (layer == p->label)
if (line == "" || line == p->contents)
++result;
}
return result;
}
#define CHECK_TRACE_WARNS() CHECK(trace_count("warn") > 0)
#define CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_WARN() \
if (trace_count("warn") > 0) { \
++Num_failures; \
cerr << "\nF - " << __FUNCTION__ << "(" << __FILE__ << ":" << __LINE__ << "): unexpected warnings\n"; \
DUMP("warn"); \
Passed = false; \
return; \
}
bool trace_doesnt_contain(string layer, string line) {
return trace_count(layer, line) == 0;
}
bool trace_doesnt_contain(string expected) {
vector<string> tmp = split(expected, ": ");
return trace_doesnt_contain(tmp.at(0), tmp.at(1));
}
#define CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN(...) CHECK(trace_doesnt_contain(__VA_ARGS__))
vector<string> split(string s, string delim) {
vector<string> result;
size_t begin=0, end=s.find(delim);
while (true) {
if (end == string::npos) {
result.push_back(string(s, begin, string::npos));
break;
}
result.push_back(string(s, begin, end-begin));
begin = SIZE(end+delim);
end = s.find(delim, begin);
}
return result;
}
string trim(const string& s) {
string::const_iterator first = s.begin();
while (first != s.end() && isspace(*first))
++first;
if (first == s.end()) return "";
string::const_iterator last = --s.end();
while (last != s.begin() && isspace(*last))
--last;
++last;
return string(first, last);
}
:(before "End Includes")
#include<vector>
using std::vector;
#include<list>
using std::list;
#include<map>
using std::map;
#include<set>
using std::set;
#include<algorithm>
#include<iostream>
using std::istream;
using std::ostream;
using std::cin;
using std::cout;
using std::cerr;
#include<iomanip>
#include<sstream>
using std::istringstream;
using std::ostringstream;
#include<fstream>
using std::ifstream;
using std::ofstream;
#define unused __attribute__((unused))
|