From 6952ee75e51123f4bbb3716c469f15c2c9cf49e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:25:26 +0800 Subject: math-science-and-philosophy: Attribute MuonNeutrino --- article/math-science-and-philosophy.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'article') diff --git a/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html b/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html index 3c2f723..54d6454 100644 --- a/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html +++ b/article/math-science-and-philosophy.html @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ class="math inline">A (i. e. physics is squishy) is both true and false. Thus, A = 1 and A = 0 are both true. Then, take a random statement B -(let's say ``my friend likes humanities''). Thus we have A + B = 1 where + is a boolean ``or'' operator because A = 1 and B must be 1 (if B is zero, then 0 + 0 = 0). Thus, if we can prove that ``physics is squishy'' and ``physics is not squishy'' (without differences -in definition), then we can literally prove that ``my friend likes +in definition), then we can literally prove that ``MuonNeutrino_ likes humanities''. Other from not defining subjective things like ``squishy'' and ``is'' (in terms of psychology), we can't get around this easily, and everything would be provable, which would not be fun for @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ Repetition is prevalent and must be reduced to a minimum.

which sometimes simply summarizes ideas already expressed by others. Please see the attached reading materials for details. Works of Eugene Wigner were especially helpful.

-

Contributors include many YK Pao School students and faculty. +

Contributors include MuonNeutrino and many YK Pao School students and faculty. Insightful conversations with friends have given me great inspiration in the ideas expressed in this article and discussions are still ongoing. For privacy reasons their names aren't listed, but I would be happy to -- cgit 1.4.1-2-gfad0