about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* small man page fixarg@mmvi2006-09-221-0/+1
|
* sander check thisarg@mmvi2006-09-221-19/+37
|
* slight change to config.arg.h (I use ff floating)arg@mmvi2006-09-221-1/+1
|
* updated man pagearg@mmvi2006-09-221-5/+1
|
* implemented the maximization as I described on the mailinglist, this feels ↵arg@mmvi2006-09-227-50/+25
| | | | better to me.
* reviewed client.carg@mmvi2006-09-201-0/+1
|
* reviewed util.carg@mmvi2006-09-201-1/+2
|
* fixed a nuance in dwm.1arg@mmvi2006-09-201-1/+1
|
* improved intro comment in dwm.h, updated config.mkarg@mmvi2006-09-202-4/+4
|
* some simplifications to intro in dwm.harg@mmvi2006-09-191-13/+13
|
* Added tag 1.6 for changeset ad3fa2d185426c51fd5deceae809770363f8d33carg@mmvi2006-09-161-0/+1
|
* added visibility check to enternotify as well 1.6arg@mmvi2006-09-151-1/+1
|
* offscreen client appearance fixesarg@mmvi2006-09-151-0/+10
|
* focus() enforces visibility of a client if not NULLarg@mmvi2006-09-151-1/+1
|
* removed useless inclusionAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-141-1/+0
|
* fixed executing of dmenu output to handle args correctlyAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-121-1/+1
|
* removed a bunch of lines through making function signatures more consistent ↵Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-127-158/+83
| | | | with my style ( { does not belong to a new line, if function args are single-lined)
* some more simplifications of intro comment in dwm.h, this should suffice for ↵Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-121-20/+14
| | | | comments in dwm
* made introduction comment in dwm.h shorterAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-121-20/+15
|
* applied Christof Musik's multihead patch for a pathologic cornercaseAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-121-1/+2
|
* added a general comment to dwm.h how dwm is basically organizedAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-121-0/+40
|
* some other simplificationsAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-111-11/+11
|
* fixed some other comments, now also the code side seems to be at a level to ↵Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-111-2/+2
| | | | be reviewed by experienced programmers
* small change to comments, renamed two set* functions in client.c into update*Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-113-17/+17
|
* small fixAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-112-3/+3
|
* added some commentsAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-112-75/+72
|
* Added tag 1.5 for changeset 728c9089b079721b43c3347124639a29baa22a97Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-081-0/+1
|
* applied sanders patch of not manipulating sel 1.5Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-082-6/+8
|
* really small changes to dwm.1Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-081-4/+3
|
* hotfixAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-071-1/+1
|
* simplified unmanageAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-071-8/+2
|
* using a global stack for focus recovery on arrange() - seems to work greatAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-074-8/+26
|
* made markups in dwm.1 more consistentAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-071-95/+38
|
* small addition to dwm.1Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-071-4/+4
|
* this patch keeps track of global z-layer order of clients which are floating ↵Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-061-12/+7
| | | | or if floating mode is enabled
* no this is betterAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-11/+11
|
* does this preserve z order for anthony?Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-8/+10
|
* maybe this might workAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-063-4/+9
|
* Added tag 1.4 for changeset 3cff9403766bf83a9fc2a0aef230115d68de2a8eAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-061-0/+1
|
* prepared dwm-1.4 update 1.4Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-2/+1
|
* drawstatus even if no client existsAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-061-1/+3
|
* sanders solution is convincing and elegantAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-49/+9
|
* seems to preserve floating client z-layer order (even with reorder() calls)Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-1/+9
|
* Added tag 1.4 for changeset a6b8994af16491220db0199623bd57d061e06143Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-061-0/+1
|
* small fixAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-062-2/+3
|
* made args mode symbols the default ones (the default ones look too ugly)Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-061-2/+2
|
* moved transient_for tag inheritance to settagsAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-063-10/+10
|
* no, reodering floating clients definately breaks the manage() policy which ↵Anselm R. Garbe2006-09-063-16/+18
| | | | attaches all clients zoomed (otherwise higher-weight clients couldn't be attached zoomed, which sucks)
* no, ordering floating clients at the end seems betterAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-053-19/+17
|
* fixAnselm R. Garbe2006-09-051-1/+1
|
26'>126 127 128 129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179