blob: 805a84eb70bdd8bdc588bf5a50ae7b1974d24fd3 (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
===================================================
Embedded Stack Trace Profiler (ESTP) User Guide
===================================================
:Author: Andreas Rumpf
:Version: |nimversion|
Nim comes with a platform independent profiler -
the Embedded Stack Trace Profiler (ESTP). The profiler
is *embedded* into your executable. To activate the profiler you need to do:
* compile your program with the ``--profiler:on --stackTrace:on`` command
line options
* import the ``nimprof`` module
* run your program as usual.
You can in fact look at ``nimprof``'s source code to see how to implement
your own profiler.
The setting ``--profiler:on`` defines the conditional symbol ``profiler``.
After your program has finished the profiler will create a
file ``profile_results.txt`` containing the profiling results.
Since the profiler works by examining stack traces, it's essential that
the option ``--stackTrace:on`` is active! Unfortunately this means that a
profiling build is much slower than a release build.
Memory profiler
===============
You can also use ESTP as a memory profiler to see which stack traces allocate
the most memory and thus create the most GC pressure. It may also help to
find memory leaks. To activate the memory profiler you need to do:
* compile your program with the ``--profiler:off --stackTrace:on -d:memProfiler``
command line options. Yes it's ``--profiler:off``.
* import the ``nimprof`` module
* run your program as usual.
Define the symbol ``ignoreAllocationSize`` so that only the number of
allocations is counted and the sizes of the memory allocations do not matter.
Example results file
====================
The results file lists stack traces ordered by significance.
The following example file has been generated by profiling the Nim compiler
itself: It shows that in total 5.4% of the runtime has been spent
in ``crcFromRope`` or its children.
In general the stack traces show you immediately where the problem is because
the trace acts like an explanation; in traditional profilers you can only find
expensive leaf functions easily but the *reason* why they are invoked
often remains mysterious.
::
total executions of each stack trace:
Entry: 0/3391 Calls: 84/4160 = 2.0% [sum: 84; 84/4160 = 2.0%]
newCrcFromRopeAux
crcFromRope
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 1/3391 Calls: 46/4160 = 1.1% [sum: 130; 130/4160 = 3.1%]
updateCrc32
newCrcFromRopeAux
crcFromRope
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 2/3391 Calls: 41/4160 = 0.99% [sum: 171; 171/4160 = 4.1%]
updateCrc32
updateCrc32
newCrcFromRopeAux
crcFromRope
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 3/3391 Calls: 41/4160 = 0.99% [sum: 212; 212/4160 = 5.1%]
crcFromFile
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 4/3391 Calls: 41/4160 = 0.99% [sum: 253; 253/4160 = 6.1%]
updateCrc32
crcFromFile
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 5/3391 Calls: 32/4160 = 0.77% [sum: 285; 285/4160 = 6.9%]
pop
newCrcFromRopeAux
crcFromRope
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
nim
Entry: 6/3391 Calls: 17/4160 = 0.41% [sum: 302; 302/4160 = 7.3%]
doOperation
forAllChildrenAux
pop
newCrcFromRopeAux
crcFromRope
writeRopeIfNotEqual
shouldRecompile
writeModule
myClose
closePasses
processModule
CompileModule
CompileProject
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
...
nim
Entry: 7/3391 Calls: 14/4160 = 0.34% [sum: 316; 316/4160 = 7.6%]
Contains
isAccessible
interiorAllocatedPtr
gcMark
markStackAndRegisters
collectCTBody
collectCT
rawNewObj
newObj
newNode
copyTree
matchesAux
matches
resolveOverloads
semOverloadedCall
semOverloadedCallAnalyseEffects
...
CommandCompileToC
MainCommand
HandleCmdLine
|