blob: 2ba854addaac19ea758200a0fd1c90d87e2a715e (
plain) (
tree)
|
|
=======================
Nim's Memory Management
=======================
.. default-role:: code
.. include:: rstcommon.rst
:Author: Andreas Rumpf
:Version: |nimversion|
..
> "The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
Multi-paradigm Memory Management Strategies
===========================================
.. default-role:: option
Nim offers multiple different memory management strategies.
To choose the memory management strategy use the `--mm:` switch.
**The recommended switch for newly written Nim code is `--mm:orc`.**
ARC/ORC
-------
`--mm:orc` is a memory management mode primarily based on reference counting. Cycles
in the object graph are handled by a "cycle collector" which is based on "trial deletion".
Since algorithms based on "tracing" are not used, the runtime behavior is oblivious to
the involved heap sizes.
The reference counting operations (= "RC ops") do not use atomic instructions and do not have to --
instead entire subgraphs are *moved* between threads. The Nim compiler also aggressively
optimizes away RC ops and exploits [move semantics](destructors.html#move-semantics).
Nim performs a fair share of optimizations for ARC/ORC; you can inspect what it did
to your time critical function via `--expandArc:functionName`.
`--mm:arc` uses the same mechanism as `--mm:orc`, but it leaves out the cycle collector.
Both ARC and ORC offer deterministic performance for `hard realtime`:idx: systems, but
ARC can be easier to reason about for people coming from Ada/C++/C -- roughly speaking
the memory for a variable is freed when it goes "out of scope".
We generally advise you to use the `acyclic` annotation in order to optimize away the
cycle collector's overhead
but `--mm:orc` also produces more machine code than `--mm:arc`, so if you're on a target
where code size matters and you know that your code does not produce cycles, you can
use `--mm:arc`. Notice that the default `async`:idx: implementation produces cycles
and leaks memory with `--mm:arc`, in other words, for `async` you need to use `--mm:orc`.
Other MM modes
--------------
.. note:: The default `refc` GC is incremental, thread-local and not "stop-the-world".
--mm:refc This is the default memory management strategy. It's a
deferred reference counting based garbage collector
with a simple Mark&Sweep backup GC in order to collect cycles. Heaps are thread-local.
[This document](refc.html) contains further information.
--mm:markAndSweep Simple Mark-And-Sweep based garbage collector.
Heaps are thread-local.
--mm:boehm Boehm based garbage collector, it offers a shared heap.
--mm:go Go's garbage collector, useful for interoperability with Go.
Offers a shared heap.
--mm:none No memory management strategy nor a garbage collector. Allocated memory is
simply never freed. You should use `--mm:arc` instead.
Here is a comparison of the different memory management modes:
================== ======== ================= ============== ===================
Memory Management Heap Reference Cycles Stop-The-World Command line switch
================== ======== ================= ============== ===================
ORC Shared Cycle Collector No `--mm:orc`
ARC Shared Leak No `--mm:arc`
RefC Local Cycle Collector No `--mm:refc`
Mark & Sweep Local Cycle Collector No `--mm:markAndSweep`
Boehm Shared Cycle Collector Yes `--mm:boehm`
Go Shared Cycle Collector Yes `--mm:go`
None Manual Manual Manual `--mm:none`
================== ======== ================= ============== ===================
.. default-role:: code
.. include:: rstcommon.rst
JavaScript's garbage collector is used for the [JavaScript and NodeJS](
backends.html#backends-the-javascript-target) compilation targets.
The [NimScript](nims.html) target uses the memory management strategy built into
the Nim compiler.
|