import macros
macro case_token(n: varargs[untyped]): untyped =
# creates a lexical analyzer from regular expressions
# ... (implementation is an exercise for the reader :-)
nil
case_token: # this colon tells the parser it is a macro statement
of r"[A-Za-z_]+[A-Za-z_0-9]*":
return tkIdentifier
of r"0-9+":
return tkInteger
of r"[\+\-\*\?]+":
return tkOperator
else:
return tkUnknown
case_token: inc i
#bug #488
macro foo: typed =
var exp = newCall("whatwhat", newIntLitNode(1))
if compiles(getAst(exp)): return exp
else: echo "Does not compute! (test OK)"
foo()
#------------------------------------
# bug #8287
type MyString = distinct string
proc `$` (c: MyString): string {.borrow.}
proc `!!` (c: cstring): int =
c.len
proc f(name: MyString): int =
!! $ name
macro repr_and_parse(fn: typed): typed =
let fn_impl = fn.getImpl
fn_impl.name = genSym(nskProc, $fn_impl.name)
echo fn_impl.repr
result = parseStmt(fn_impl.repr)
macro repr_to_string(fn: typed): string =
let fn_impl = fn.getImpl
result = newStrLitNode(fn_impl.repr)
repr_and_parse(f)
#------------------------------------
# bugs #8343 and #8344
proc one_if_proc(x, y : int): int =
if x < y: result = x
else: result = y
proc test_block(x, y : int): int =
block label:
result = x
result = y
#------------------------------------
# bugs #8348
template `>`(x, y: untyped): untyped =
## "is greater" operator. This is the same as ``y < x``.
y < x
proc test_cond_stmtlist(x, y: int): int =
result = x
if x > y:
result = x
#------------------------------------
# bug #8762
proc t2(a, b: int): int =
`+`(a, b)
#------------------------------------
# bug #8761
proc fn1(x, y: int):int =
2 * (x + y)
proc fn2(x, y: float): float =
(y + 2 * x) / (x - y)
proc fn3(x, y: int): bool =
(((x and 3) div 4) or (x mod (y xor -1))) == 0 or y notin [1,2]
static:
let fn1s = "proc fn1(x, y: int): int =\n result = 2 * (x + y)\n"
let fn2s = "proc fn2(x, y: float): float =\n result = (y + 2 * x) / (x - y)\n"
let fn3s = "proc fn3(x, y: int): bool =\n result = ((x and 3) div 4 or x mod (y xor -1)) == 0 or not contains([1, 2], y)\n"
doAssert fn1.repr_to_string == fn1s
doAssert fn2.repr_to_string == fn2s
doAssert fn3.repr_to_string == fn3s
#------------------------------------
# bug #8763
type
A {.pure.} = enum
X, Y
B {.pure.} = enum
X, Y
proc test_pure_enums(a: B) =
case a
of B.X: echo B.X
of B.Y: echo B.Y
repr_and_parse(one_if_proc)
repr_and_parse(test_block)
repr_and_parse(test_cond_stmtlist)
repr_and_parse(t2)
repr_and_parse(test_pure_enums)