diff options
| author | Andreas Rumpf <andreas@andreas-laptop> | 2010-03-20 20:13:14 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andreas Rumpf <andreas@andreas-laptop> | 2010-03-20 20:13:14 +0100 |
| commit | e62a02d5af90e243bf5d84fdf2ac3567e94bdf58 (patch) | |
| tree | 62e2cf9b1760ba01df94c1b01f7260321021ee1f /web/question.txt | |
| parent | 7d6de1cf90858700733091b9a592b2fac7549af5 (diff) | |
| download | Nim-e62a02d5af90e243bf5d84fdf2ac3567e94bdf58.tar.gz | |
versioning for GTK wrappers
Diffstat (limited to 'web/question.txt')
| -rwxr-xr-x | web/question.txt | 5 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/web/question.txt b/web/question.txt index 6cd44391d..bce9c0c74 100755 --- a/web/question.txt +++ b/web/question.txt @@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ and their interactions are subject to change. How fast is Nimrod? ------------------- Benchmarks have not been ported yet and support for threads is missing. But in -the worst case, you can get exactly the same performance as in C if you decide +the worst case, you can get the same performance as in C if you decide to write as low-level Nimrod code as C requires you to do. That said the only -overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years (and is -significantly faster than the Boehm GC). +overhead Nimrod has over C is the GC which has been tuned for years. Compilation |