diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | compiler/vmdeps.nim | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | web/news/e031_version_0_16_2.rst | 4 |
2 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/vmdeps.nim b/compiler/vmdeps.nim index 779d6d2a4..d684c4c32 100644 --- a/compiler/vmdeps.nim +++ b/compiler/vmdeps.nim @@ -214,7 +214,9 @@ proc mapTypeToAstX(t: PType; info: TLineInfo; result = atomicType(t.sym) of tyEnum: result = newNodeIT(nkEnumTy, if t.n.isNil: info else: t.n.info, t) - result.add copyTree(t.n) + result.add ast.emptyNode # pragma node, currently always empty for enum + for c in t.n.sons: + result.add copyTree(c) of tyTuple: if inst: result = newNodeX(nkTupleTy) diff --git a/web/news/e031_version_0_16_2.rst b/web/news/e031_version_0_16_2.rst index a4202833f..35f3716a3 100644 --- a/web/news/e031_version_0_16_2.rst +++ b/web/news/e031_version_0_16_2.rst @@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ Changes affecting backwards compatibility upfront every implementation needs to fullfill these contracts. - ``system.getAst templateCall(x, y)`` now typechecks the ``templateCall`` properly. You need to patch your code accordingly. +- ``macros.getType`` and ``macros.getTypeImpl`` for an enum will now return an + AST that is the same as what is used to define an enum. Previously the AST + returned had a repeated ``EnumTy`` node and was missing the initial pragma + node (which is currently empty for an enum). Library Additions |