diff options
-rw-r--r-- | doc/tut1.txt | 72 |
1 files changed, 36 insertions, 36 deletions
diff --git a/doc/tut1.txt b/doc/tut1.txt index cb5a0c8dd..58ace1dbe 100644 --- a/doc/tut1.txt +++ b/doc/tut1.txt @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Introduction </p></blockquote> -This document is a tutorial for the programming language *Nim*. +This document is a tutorial for the programming language *Nim*. This tutorial assumes that you are familiar with basic programming concepts like variables, types or statements but is kept very basic. The `manual <manual.html>`_ contains many more examples of the advanced language features. @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Commonly used commands and switches have abbreviations, so you can also use:: nim c -r greetings.nim To compile a release version use:: - + nim c -d:release greetings.nim By default the Nim compiler generates a large amount of runtime checks @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ hash character ``#``. Documentation comments start with ``##``: .. code-block:: nim # A comment. - + var myVariable: int ## a documentation comment @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ constant declaration at compile time: .. code-block:: nim const x = "abc" # the constant x contains the string "abc" - + Indentation can be used after the ``const`` keyword to list a whole section of constants: @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ constants: The let statement ================= -The ``let`` statement works like the ``var`` statement but the declared +The ``let`` statement works like the ``var`` statement but the declared symbols are *single assignment* variables: After the initialization their value cannot change: @@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ and put it into a data section": .. code-block:: const input = readLine(stdin) # Error: constant expression expected - + .. code-block:: let input = readLine(stdin) # works @@ -310,8 +310,8 @@ the compiler that for every other value nothing should be done: else: discard The empty `discard statement`_ is a *do nothing* statement. The compiler knows -that a case statement with an else part cannot fail and thus the error -disappears. Note that it is impossible to cover all possible string values: +that a case statement with an else part cannot fail and thus the error +disappears. Note that it is impossible to cover all possible string values: that is why string cases always need an ``else`` branch. In general the case statement is used for subrange types or enumerations where @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ The block's *label* (``myblock`` in the example) is optional. Break statement --------------- A block can be left prematurely with a ``break`` statement. The break statement -can leave a ``while``, ``for``, or a ``block`` statement. It leaves the +can leave a ``while``, ``for``, or a ``block`` statement. It leaves the innermost construct, unless a label of a block is given: .. code-block:: nim @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ differences: * The statements within a branch do not open a new scope. * The compiler checks the semantics and produces code *only* for the statements that belong to the first condition that evaluates to ``true``. - + The ``when`` statement is useful for writing platform specific code, similar to the ``#ifdef`` construct in the C programming language. @@ -486,14 +486,14 @@ to be indented, but single simple statements do not: .. code-block:: nim # no indentation needed for single assignment statement: if x: x = false - + # indentation needed for nested if statement: if x: if y: y = false else: y = true - + # indentation needed, because two statements follow the condition: if x: x = false @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ contain indentation at certain places for better readability: As a rule of thumb, indentation within expressions is allowed after operators, an open parenthesis and after commas. -With parenthesis and semicolons ``(;)`` you can use statements where only +With parenthesis and semicolons ``(;)`` you can use statements where only an expression is allowed: .. code-block:: nim @@ -560,45 +560,45 @@ Some terminology: in the example ``question`` is called a (formal) *parameter*, Result variable --------------- -A procedure that returns a value has an implicit ``result`` variable declared +A procedure that returns a value has an implicit ``result`` variable declared that represents the return value. A ``return`` statement with no expression is a -shorthand for ``return result``. The ``result`` value is always returned +shorthand for ``return result``. The ``result`` value is always returned automatically at the end a procedure if there is no ``return`` statement at the exit. .. code-block:: nim - proc sumTillNegative(x: varargs[int]): int = + proc sumTillNegative(x: varargs[int]): int = for i in x: if i < 0: return - result = result + i - + result = result + i + echo sumTillNegative() # echos 0 echo sumTillNegative(3, 4, 5) # echos 12 echo sumTillNegative(3, 4 , -1 , 6) # echos 7 -The ``result`` variable is already implicitly declared at the start of the +The ``result`` variable is already implicitly declared at the start of the function, so declaring it again with 'var result', for example, would shadow it with a normal variable of the same name. The result variable is also already initialised with the type's default value. Note that referential data types will be ``nil`` at the start of the procedure, and thus may require manual initialisation. - + Parameters ---------- Parameters are constant in the procedure body. By default, their value cannot be -changed because this allows the compiler to implement parameter passing in the +changed because this allows the compiler to implement parameter passing in the most efficient way. If a mutable variable is needed inside the procedure, it has to be declared with ``var`` in the procedure body. Shadowing the parameter name -is possible, and actually an idiom: +is possible, and actually an idiom: .. code-block:: nim proc printSeq(s: seq, nprinted: int = -1) = var nprinted = if nprinted == -1: s.len else: min(nprinted, s.len) for i in 0 .. <nprinted: echo s[i] - + If the procedure needs to modify the argument for the caller, a ``var`` parameter can be used: @@ -630,12 +630,12 @@ allow to silently throw away a return value: The return value can be ignored implicitly if the called proc/iterator has -been declared with the ``discardable`` pragma: +been declared with the ``discardable`` pragma: .. code-block:: nim - proc p(x, y: int): int {.discardable.} = + proc p(x, y: int): int {.discardable.} = return x + y - + p(3, 4) # now valid The ``discard`` statement can also be used to create block comments as @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ object on the heap, so there is a trade-off to be made here. Integers -------- -Nim has these integer types built-in: +Nim has these integer types built-in: ``int int8 int16 int32 int64 uint uint8 uint16 uint32 uint64``. The default integer type is ``int``. Integer literals can have a *type suffix* @@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ Arrays An array is a simple fixed length container. Each element in the array has the same type. The array's index type can be any ordinal type. -Arrays can be constructed via ``[]``: +Arrays can be constructed via ``[]``: .. code-block:: nim @@ -1370,12 +1370,12 @@ integer. var building: tuple[street: string, number: int] building = ("Rue del Percebe", 13) echo(building.street) - + # The following line does not compile, they are different tuples! #person = building # --> Error: type mismatch: got (tuple[street: string, number: int]) # but expected 'Person' - + # The following works because the field names and types are the same. var teacher: tuple[name: string, age: int] = ("Mark", 42) person = teacher @@ -1450,13 +1450,13 @@ operators perform implicit dereferencing operations for reference types: type Node = ref NodeObj - NodeObj = object - le, ri: PNode + NodeObj = object + le, ri: Node data: int var n: Node new(n) - n.data = 9 + n.data = 9 # no need to write n[].data; in fact n[].data is highly discouraged! To allocate a new traced object, the built-in procedure ``new`` has to be used. @@ -1559,9 +1559,9 @@ This is best illustrated by an example: A symbol of a module *can* be *qualified* with the ``module.symbol`` syntax. If -the symbol is ambiguous, it even *has* to be qualified. A symbol is ambiguous -if it is defined in two (or more) different modules and both modules are -imported by a third one: +the symbol is ambiguous, it even *has* to be qualified. A symbol is ambiguous +if it is defined in two (or more) different modules and both modules are +imported by a third one: .. code-block:: nim # Module A |