summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/lib/system/arithm.nim
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/system/arithm.nim')
-rw-r--r--lib/system/arithm.nim425
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 425 deletions
diff --git a/lib/system/arithm.nim b/lib/system/arithm.nim
deleted file mode 100644
index 158f40177..000000000
--- a/lib/system/arithm.nim
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,425 +0,0 @@
-#
-#
-#            Nim's Runtime Library
-#        (c) Copyright 2012 Andreas Rumpf
-#
-#    See the file "copying.txt", included in this
-#    distribution, for details about the copyright.
-#
-
-
-# simple integer arithmetic with overflow checking
-
-proc raiseOverflow {.compilerproc, noinline.} =
-  # a single proc to reduce code size to a minimum
-  sysFatal(OverflowDefect, "over- or underflow")
-
-proc raiseDivByZero {.compilerproc, noinline.} =
-  sysFatal(DivByZeroDefect, "division by zero")
-
-when defined(builtinOverflow):
-  # Builtin compiler functions for improved performance
-  when sizeof(clong) == 8:
-    proc addInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_saddl_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc subInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_ssubl_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc mulInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_smull_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-  elif sizeof(clonglong) == 8:
-    proc addInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_saddll_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc subInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_ssubll_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc mulInt64Overflow[T: int64|int](a, b: T, c: var T): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_smulll_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-  when sizeof(int) == 8:
-    proc addIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.inline.} =
-      addInt64Overflow(a, b, c)
-
-    proc subIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.inline.} =
-      subInt64Overflow(a, b, c)
-
-    proc mulIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.inline.} =
-      mulInt64Overflow(a, b, c)
-
-  elif sizeof(int) == 4 and sizeof(cint) == 4:
-    proc addIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_sadd_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc subIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_ssub_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-    proc mulIntOverflow(a, b: int, c: var int): bool {.
-      importc: "__builtin_smul_overflow", nodecl, nosideeffect.}
-
-  proc addInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if addInt64Overflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-
-  proc subInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if subInt64Overflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-
-  proc mulInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if mulInt64Overflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-else:
-  proc addInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    result = a +% b
-    if (result xor a) >= int64(0) or (result xor b) >= int64(0):
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-  proc subInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    result = a -% b
-    if (result xor a) >= int64(0) or (result xor not b) >= int64(0):
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-  #
-  # This code has been inspired by Python's source code.
-  # The native int product x*y is either exactly right or *way* off, being
-  # just the last n bits of the true product, where n is the number of bits
-  # in an int (the delivered product is the true product plus i*2**n for
-  # some integer i).
-  #
-  # The native float64 product x*y is subject to three
-  # rounding errors: on a sizeof(int)==8 box, each cast to double can lose
-  # info, and even on a sizeof(int)==4 box, the multiplication can lose info.
-  # But, unlike the native int product, it's not in *range* trouble:  even
-  # if sizeof(int)==32 (256-bit ints), the product easily fits in the
-  # dynamic range of a float64. So the leading 50 (or so) bits of the float64
-  # product are correct.
-  #
-  # We check these two ways against each other, and declare victory if they're
-  # approximately the same. Else, because the native int product is the only
-  # one that can lose catastrophic amounts of information, it's the native int
-  # product that must have overflowed.
-  #
-  proc mulInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc.} =
-    var
-      resAsFloat, floatProd: float64
-    result = a *% b
-    floatProd = toBiggestFloat(a) # conversion
-    floatProd = floatProd * toBiggestFloat(b)
-    resAsFloat = toBiggestFloat(result)
-
-    # Fast path for normal case: small multiplicands, and no info
-    # is lost in either method.
-    if resAsFloat == floatProd: return result
-
-    # Somebody somewhere lost info. Close enough, or way off? Note
-    # that a != 0 and b != 0 (else resAsFloat == floatProd == 0).
-    # The difference either is or isn't significant compared to the
-    # true value (of which floatProd is a good approximation).
-
-    # abs(diff)/abs(prod) <= 1/32 iff
-    #   32 * abs(diff) <= abs(prod) -- 5 good bits is "close enough"
-    if 32.0 * abs(resAsFloat - floatProd) <= abs(floatProd):
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-proc negInt64(a: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if a != low(int64): return -a
-  raiseOverflow()
-
-proc absInt64(a: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if a != low(int64):
-    if a >= 0: return a
-    else: return -a
-  raiseOverflow()
-
-proc divInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if b == int64(0):
-    raiseDivByZero()
-  if a == low(int64) and b == int64(-1):
-    raiseOverflow()
-  return a div b
-
-proc modInt64(a, b: int64): int64 {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if b == int64(0):
-    raiseDivByZero()
-  return a mod b
-
-proc absInt(a: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if a != low(int):
-    if a >= 0: return a
-    else: return -a
-  raiseOverflow()
-
-const
-  asmVersion = defined(i386) and (defined(vcc) or defined(wcc) or
-               defined(dmc) or defined(gcc) or defined(llvm_gcc))
-    # my Version of Borland C++Builder does not have
-    # tasm32, which is needed for assembler blocks
-    # this is why Borland is not included in the 'when'
-
-when asmVersion and not defined(gcc) and not defined(llvm_gcc):
-  # assembler optimized versions for compilers that
-  # have an intel syntax assembler:
-  proc addInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    # a in eax, and b in edx
-    asm """
-        mov eax, ecx
-        add eax, edx
-        jno theEnd
-        call `raiseOverflow`
-      theEnd:
-        ret
-    """
-
-  proc subInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    asm """
-        mov eax, ecx
-        sub eax, edx
-        jno theEnd
-        call `raiseOverflow`
-      theEnd:
-        ret
-    """
-
-  proc negInt(a: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    asm """
-        mov eax, ecx
-        neg eax
-        jno theEnd
-        call `raiseOverflow`
-      theEnd:
-        ret
-    """
-
-  proc divInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    asm """
-        test  edx, edx
-        jne   L_NOT_ZERO
-        call  `raiseDivByZero`
-      L_NOT_ZERO:
-        cmp   ecx, 0x80000000
-        jne   L_DO_DIV
-        cmp   edx, -1
-        jne   L_DO_DIV
-        call  `raiseOverflow`
-      L_DO_DIV:
-        mov   eax, ecx
-        mov   ecx, edx
-        cdq
-        idiv  ecx
-        ret
-    """
-
-  proc modInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    asm """
-        test  edx, edx
-        jne   L_NOT_ZERO
-        call  `raiseDivByZero`
-      L_NOT_ZERO:
-        cmp   ecx, 0x80000000
-        jne   L_DO_DIV
-        cmp   edx, -1
-        jne   L_DO_DIV
-        call  `raiseOverflow`
-      L_DO_DIV:
-        mov   eax, ecx
-        mov   ecx, edx
-        cdq
-        idiv  ecx
-        mov   eax, edx
-        ret
-    """
-
-  proc mulInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, asmNoStackFrame.} =
-    asm """
-        mov eax, ecx
-        mov ecx, edx
-        xor edx, edx
-        imul ecx
-        jno theEnd
-        call `raiseOverflow`
-      theEnd:
-        ret
-    """
-
-elif false: # asmVersion and (defined(gcc) or defined(llvm_gcc)):
-  proc addInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    # don't use a pure proc here!
-    asm """
-      "addl %%ecx, %%eax\n"
-      "jno 1\n"
-      "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-      "1: \n"
-      :"=a"(`result`)
-      :"a"(`a`), "c"(`b`)
-    """
-    #".intel_syntax noprefix"
-    #/* Intel syntax here */
-    #".att_syntax"
-
-  proc subInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    asm """ "subl %%ecx,%%eax\n"
-            "jno 1\n"
-            "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-            "1: \n"
-           :"=a"(`result`)
-           :"a"(`a`), "c"(`b`)
-    """
-
-  proc mulInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    asm """  "xorl %%edx, %%edx\n"
-             "imull %%ecx\n"
-             "jno 1\n"
-             "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-             "1: \n"
-            :"=a"(`result`)
-            :"a"(`a`), "c"(`b`)
-            :"%edx"
-    """
-
-  proc negInt(a: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    asm """ "negl %%eax\n"
-            "jno 1\n"
-            "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-            "1: \n"
-           :"=a"(`result`)
-           :"a"(`a`)
-    """
-
-  proc divInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    asm """  "xorl %%edx, %%edx\n"
-             "idivl %%ecx\n"
-             "jno 1\n"
-             "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-             "1: \n"
-            :"=a"(`result`)
-            :"a"(`a`), "c"(`b`)
-            :"%edx"
-    """
-
-  proc modInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    asm """  "xorl %%edx, %%edx\n"
-             "idivl %%ecx\n"
-             "jno 1\n"
-             "call _raiseOverflow\n"
-             "1: \n"
-             "movl %%edx, %%eax"
-            :"=a"(`result`)
-            :"a"(`a`), "c"(`b`)
-            :"%edx"
-    """
-
-when not declared(addInt) and defined(builtinOverflow):
-  proc addInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if addIntOverflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-
-when not declared(subInt) and defined(builtinOverflow):
-  proc subInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if subIntOverflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-
-when not declared(mulInt) and defined(builtinOverflow):
-  proc mulInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if mulIntOverflow(a, b, result):
-      raiseOverflow()
-
-# Platform independent versions of the above (slower!)
-when not declared(addInt):
-  proc addInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    result = a +% b
-    if (result xor a) >= 0 or (result xor b) >= 0:
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-when not declared(subInt):
-  proc subInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    result = a -% b
-    if (result xor a) >= 0 or (result xor not b) >= 0:
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-when not declared(negInt):
-  proc negInt(a: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if a != low(int): return -a
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-when not declared(divInt):
-  proc divInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if b == 0:
-      raiseDivByZero()
-    if a == low(int) and b == -1:
-      raiseOverflow()
-    return a div b
-
-when not declared(modInt):
-  proc modInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-    if b == 0:
-      raiseDivByZero()
-    return a mod b
-
-when not declared(mulInt):
-  #
-  # This code has been inspired by Python's source code.
-  # The native int product x*y is either exactly right or *way* off, being
-  # just the last n bits of the true product, where n is the number of bits
-  # in an int (the delivered product is the true product plus i*2**n for
-  # some integer i).
-  #
-  # The native float64 product x*y is subject to three
-  # rounding errors: on a sizeof(int)==8 box, each cast to double can lose
-  # info, and even on a sizeof(int)==4 box, the multiplication can lose info.
-  # But, unlike the native int product, it's not in *range* trouble:  even
-  # if sizeof(int)==32 (256-bit ints), the product easily fits in the
-  # dynamic range of a float64. So the leading 50 (or so) bits of the float64
-  # product are correct.
-  #
-  # We check these two ways against each other, and declare victory if
-  # they're approximately the same. Else, because the native int product is
-  # the only one that can lose catastrophic amounts of information, it's the
-  # native int product that must have overflowed.
-  #
-  proc mulInt(a, b: int): int {.compilerproc.} =
-    var
-      resAsFloat, floatProd: float
-
-    result = a *% b
-    floatProd = toFloat(a) * toFloat(b)
-    resAsFloat = toFloat(result)
-
-    # Fast path for normal case: small multiplicands, and no info
-    # is lost in either method.
-    if resAsFloat == floatProd: return result
-
-    # Somebody somewhere lost info. Close enough, or way off? Note
-    # that a != 0 and b != 0 (else resAsFloat == floatProd == 0).
-    # The difference either is or isn't significant compared to the
-    # true value (of which floatProd is a good approximation).
-
-    # abs(diff)/abs(prod) <= 1/32 iff
-    #   32 * abs(diff) <= abs(prod) -- 5 good bits is "close enough"
-    if 32.0 * abs(resAsFloat - floatProd) <= abs(floatProd):
-      return result
-    raiseOverflow()
-
-# We avoid setting the FPU control word here for compatibility with libraries
-# written in other languages.
-
-proc raiseFloatInvalidOp {.compilerproc, noinline.} =
-  sysFatal(FloatInvalidOpDefect, "FPU operation caused a NaN result")
-
-proc nanCheck(x: float64) {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if x != x: raiseFloatInvalidOp()
-
-proc raiseFloatOverflow(x: float64) {.compilerproc, noinline.} =
-  if x > 0.0:
-    sysFatal(FloatOverflowDefect, "FPU operation caused an overflow")
-  else:
-    sysFatal(FloatUnderflowDefect, "FPU operations caused an underflow")
-
-proc infCheck(x: float64) {.compilerproc, inline.} =
-  if x != 0.0 and x*0.5 == x: raiseFloatOverflow(x)