summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/web/news/e026_survey_results.rst
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'web/news/e026_survey_results.rst')
-rw-r--r--web/news/e026_survey_results.rst699
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 699 deletions
diff --git a/web/news/e026_survey_results.rst b/web/news/e026_survey_results.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 106dce0e4..000000000
--- a/web/news/e026_survey_results.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,699 +0,0 @@
-Nim Community Survey Results
-============================
-
-.. container:: metadata
-
-  Posted by Dominik Picheta on 3 September 2016
-
-We have recently closed the 2016 Nim Community Survey. I am happy to
-say that we have received exactly 790 responses, huge thanks go to the people
-that took the time to respond. We're incredibly thankful for this very valuable
-feedback.
-
-This survey was inspired in part by the
-`2016 State of Rust <https://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/06/30/State-of-Rust-Survey-2016.html>`_
-survey. You will note that many of the questions were modelled after
-Rust's survey. One of the reasons for doing this was to allow us to easily
-compare our results against the results obtained in the Rust survey. In
-addition, we of course also liked many of their questions.
-
-Our survey ran from the 23rd of June 2016 until the 8th of August 2016. The
-response numbers are impressive considering Nim's community size; at 790 they
-make up just over 25% of the Rust survey's responses.
-
-The goal of this survey was to primarily determine how our community is using
-Nim, in order to better understand how we should be improving it. In particular,
-we wanted to know what people feel is missing from Nim in the lead up to
-version 1.0. We have also asked our respondents about how well the Nim tools
-worked, the challenges of adopting Nim, the resources that they used to learn
-Nim and more.
-
-It is my hope that we will be able to run a similar survey in a years time,
-doing so should give us an idea of whether we are improving.
-With these general facts in mind, let's begin looking at specific questions.
-
-How did you find out about Nim?
--------------------------------
-
-The rationale for the first question was simple, we wanted to know where our
-respondents found out about Nim. This is an interesting question for us, as
-we do occassionally get users asking us why it took so long for them to hear
-about Nim. It allows us to see how effective each website is at spreading the
-word about Nim.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_found.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_found.png" alt="How did you find out about Nim?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-The majority of our respondents found Nim via Reddit, HackerNews or a search
-engine such as Google. These results are not altogether surprising. There were
-also a lot of "Other" responses, some of which were a bit more
-interesting. These included multiple mentions of habrahabr.ru, Dr. Dobb's,
-and lobste.rs.
-
-Do you use Nim?
----------------
-
-Just like the Rust survey creators, we wanted to ensure that our survey was
-open to both Nim users as well people who never used Nim. In addition to
-those two groups, we have also included a third group of people: ex-Nim
-users. All three are interesting, for many different reasons.
-Nim users can tell us how they are using Nim and also how Nim's
-tooling can improve. Ex-Nim users give us an
-idea of why they stopped using Nim. Finally, respondents who never used Nim
-can tell us the reasons for not adopting it.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/do_you_use_nim.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/do_you_use_nim.png" alt="Do you use Nim?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-It's nice to see that we have such a good range of respondents. The Rust survey
-had a much larger number of Rust users amongst their respondents, with
-no distinction between users that never used Rust and users that stopped using
-Rust.
-
-Should we consider your answers to be invalid?
-----------------------------------------------
-
-This was something I thought would be interesting to have, after I saw it
-being used in another survey. While it does pinpoint possibly
-invalid respondents, I have opted against filtering those out. Mainly because
-that would require re-creating each of the charts generated by Google Forms
-manually.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/reliability.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/reliability.png" alt="Should we consider your answers to be invalid?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-According to the responses to this question, around 94% of our responses
-can be considered reliable.
-
-Nim users
----------
-
-The following questions were answered only by the 38.9% of our respondents
-who identified themselves as Nim users.
-
-How long have you been using Nim?
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_time.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_time.png" alt="How long have you been using Nim?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-A large proportion of our Nim users were new. This is good news as it means that
-our community is growing, with a large proportion of new Nim users that could
-become long-term Nimians. In total, more than 35% of Nim users can be considered
-new having used Nim for less than 3 months. With 18% of Nim users that can
-be considered very new having used Nim for less than a month.
-This could suggest that 18% of our users have only just found out about Nim in
-the last week or so and have not yet got the chance to use it extensively.
-
-The high percentages of long term Nim users are encouraging.
-They suggest
-that many users are continuing to use Nim after making it through the first
-few months. The sharp drop at 7-9 months is interesting, but may simply be
-due to the fact that there were fewer newcomers during that period, or it
-could be because our respondents are more likely to estimate that they have
-been using Nim for a year or half a year rather than the awkward 7-9 months.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_time_rust.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_time_rust.png" alt="Time using Nim and Rust" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-The results for Nim and Rust are actually remarkably similar. They both show a
-drop at 7-9 months, although Rust's isn't as dramatic. Nim on the other hand
-has a significantly higher percentage of new Nim users.
-
-Do you use Nim at work?
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-An important aspect of a language's adoption is whether it is being used for
-"real" work. We wanted to know how many people are using Nim in their day
-jobs and under what circumstances it is used.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_at_work.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_at_work.png" alt="Do you use Nim at work?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-While a vast majority of our users are not using Nim at work, more than 25%
-of them are. It's encouraging to see such a high number already, even before
-we have released version 1.0. In fact, this percentage is likely close to 30%,
-because many of the "Other" responses mention using Nim for the likes of
-internal tools or small scripts to help with the respondent's work.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="https://blog.rust-lang.org/images/2016-06-Survey/rust_at_work.png">
-    <img src="https://blog.rust-lang.org/images/2016-06-Survey/rust_at_work.png" alt="Do you use Rust at work?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Interestingly, a larger percentage of Nim users are using Nim at work than
-Rust users. The sample sizes are of course vastly different, but it's still an
-interesting result. Combined, nearly 1/5th of Rust users are using Rust
-commercially whereas more than a quarter of Nim users are using Nim
-commercially.
-
-Approximately how large are all the Nim projects that you work on?
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-Finding out how large the Nim projects worked on by Nim users are is also
-very valuable.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size.png" alt="Nim project size for all users" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-This shows us that currently Nim is primarily being used for small scripts and
-applications, with nearly 60% of the projects consisting of less than 1,000
-lines of code. This makes sense as many of our users are not using Nim
-professionally, but are doing so in their spare time.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size_work.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size_work.png" alt="Nim project size for work users" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-The numbers for part-time and full-time work users of Nim tell a different
-story. Over 70% of the projects written by full-time users are between 10,001
-and 100,000 lines of code. Part-time users show a slightly different trend,
-with many more small projects, the majority being between 1,000 and
-10,000 lines of code.
-
-Overall it's good to see that there is a few large projects out there which are
-composed of more than 100,000 lines of code. We expect to see the amount of
-large projects to grow with time, especially with version 1.0 on the way.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size_nim_rust.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/project_size_nim_rust.png" alt="Nim project size for work users (Nim vs. Rust)" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-In comparison to Rust the proportion of project sizes for full-time users is
-vastly different. This is likely due to our small sample size. Project sizes for
-part-time users between Rust and Nim are somewhat similar, with differences of
-around 10% for each project size.
-
-Do you plan to try to use Nim at work?
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/planning_to_use_at_work.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/planning_to_use_at_work.png" alt="Planning to use Nim at work?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-It's also encouraging to see that over 50% of Nim users are planning to use
-Nim at work! This is slightly more than Rust's 40% and should help Nim's
-adoption into even more areas.
-
-Nim and its tools
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-In this section of the survey, we wanted to find out the tools that Nim
-users are utilising when developing Nim applications.
-
-What editor(s) do you use when writing Nim?
-___________________________________________
-
-Programmers are very specific when it comes to their editor of choice, because
-of that it's good to know which editor is most popular among our community.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/editors.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/editors.png" alt="Editors used by Nim users" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Looks like Vim is the winner with almost 30%. Followed by Sublime Text and
-Emacs. Aporia, the Nim IDE, gets a respectable 15.5%. There was
-also more than
-17% of answers which included "Other" editors, such as: Notepad++, Geany, gedit,
-and Kate.
-
-What operating system(s) do you compile for and run your Nim projects on?
-_________________________________________________________________________
-
-This question gave us information about the most popular target operating
-systems, as well as some of the more obscure ones. We have asked this question
-to find out the platforms on which Nim applications run on most frequently.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/target_os.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/target_os.png" alt="Target operating systems" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-This question allowed multiple choices, so each percentage is out of the total
-number of respondents for this question. For example, 80.7% of the
-respondents selected "Linux" but only 26.6% selected OS X.
-
-This makes Linux by far the most popular target for Nim applications.
-Some "Other" targets included: BSD (OpenBSD, FreeBSD), iOS, Android, and
-JavaScript.
-It's great to see Nim being used on such a wide variety of platforms.
-
-What operating system(s) do you develop Nim projects on?
-________________________________________________________
-
-With this question, we wanted to know what operating systems are used for
-development.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/dev_os.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/dev_os.png" alt="Development operating systems" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-This question also allowed multiple choices and ended up with very similar
-results.
-
-You can see that Linux is also the most popular developmental
-platform for Nim. But it's more popular as a target platform.
-
-Which version(s) of Nim do you use for your applications?
-_________________________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_versions.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_versions.png" alt="Version use" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-At the time of this survey, version 0.14.2 was the latest stable release.
-It's no wonder that it is the most commonly used release of Nim. It's good to
-see that the older versions are not used as often. The high use of ``Git HEAD (devel)``
-(nightly builds) isn't surprising, Nim is still evolving rapidly and our
-release schedule is not regular or frequent.
-
-Once we go past the 1.0 release, we expect to see much less use of the unstable
-``devel`` branch.
-
-Has upgrading to a new version of the Nim compiler broken your code?
-____________________________________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/breakage.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/breakage.png" alt="Breakage" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Despite the unstable nature of Nim in the lead up to version 1.0, whenever
-we make breaking changes we do our best to deprecate things and ensure that
-old code continues to work for our users. Of course sometimes this is not
-possible and other times it is simply easier to add a breaking change.
-
-This question was asked to determine how much our user base is affected by
-breaking changes between Nim versions. We decided to have three possible
-answers for this question in order to give us an idea how frequent the
-breakage was.
-
-It's incredible to see that over 50% of our users have not experienced any
-breakage after upgrading. We expect this number to increase significantly
-after version 1.0 is released. Of the users that did experience breakage,
-over 80% of them said that it was a rare occurrence.
-
-In comparison to Rust, our results show that there was a higher percentage of
-users experiencing breakage as a result of an upgrade. This is to be expected,
-because Nim is still in its pre-1.0 period, whereas Rust 1.0 has been released
-over a year ago now.
-
-Unfortunately while we are still in this pre-1.0 period, releases will likely
-introduce breaking changes as we refine certain aspects of Nim such as its
-standard library, so the number of users experiencing breaking changes may
-increase.
-
-If so, how much work did it take to fix it?
-___________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/difficulty_fixing_breakage.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/difficulty_fixing_breakage.png" alt="difficulty fixing breakage" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Thankfully most of the breakage experienced by Nim users was very easy to fix.
-
-
-If you used Nimble, do you like it?
-___________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nimble_opinion.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nimble_opinion.png" alt="Do you like Nimble?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Nimble is the Nim package manager, a tool that is very important in Nim's
-ecosystem as it allows developers to easily install dependencies for their
-software.
-
-The majority of respondents rated it as a 4, showing us that the majority does
-like Nimble. With over 55% rating it a 4 or 5. This percentage isn't as
-overwhelming as the 94.1% of users that rated Cargo a 4 or 5 in the Rust
-survey. Based on these results I think that we definitely need to do a
-better job with Nimble.
-
-In our next survey, it might be a good idea to ask more questions about Nimble
-to determine how exactly it can be improved.
-
-What aspects of Nim do you find most appealing?
-_______________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_appeal.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_appeal.png" alt="What aspects of Nim do you find most appealing?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-We were interested to know the features of Nim that appeal most to our users.
-More than 80% of our respondents selected "Execution Speed" as one of the
-features that appeal to them. With "Development Speed" and "Readability"
-tying for second place and "Metaprogramming" at third place.
-
-The options given to our respondents are rather predictable,
-they do show us which of these features have the highest appeal though.
-What's more interesting are the "Other" answers.
-
-By far the most popular "Other" answer was related to Nim's compilation to C.
-Many users mentioned that they like how easy it is to interface with C
-libraries and the great portability that compiling to C offers.
-
-What aspects of Nim do you find most displeasing?
-_________________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_displeasing.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/nim_displeasing.png" alt="What aspects of Nim do you find most displeasing?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-It was only natural to ask this question. The results are almost perfectly
-opposite to the previous question's answers, with almost 50% of respondents
-selecting "Debugging Tools"
-as the most displeasing aspect of Nim. With "Documentation" and "Testing Tools"
-in second and third place respectively. There is also a much larger number of
-"Other" answers to this question.
-
-The "Other" answers for this question vary a lot. Here is a selection of
-them, ordered by frequency:
-
-* Small community size.
-* Lack of in-depth tutorials.
-* Quality of error messages.
-* Forward declarations and no cyclic imports.
-* Bugs in the standard library.
-* No good IDE.
-* No REPL.
-* No major version.
-* Bugs in the compiler.
-* Lack of libraries.
-* Difficulty installing on Windows.
-* Non-intuitive semantics of various constructs.
-* Lack of immutable collections.
-* Async/await not being production ready.
-* Lack of shared collections for threads.
-* No Haxe target.
-* Memory safety.
-
-We hope that we can improve these things with time. Many of these issues are
-already being worked on, including the removal of the need for forward
-declarations. Some of these issues like our small community size are difficult
-to fix, but we will nonetheless do our best.
-
-
-Previous Nim users
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-For users that have used Nim before but decided against using it, we asked just
-one specific question. The proportion of our respondents that answered it
-was 24%.
-
-Why did you stop using Nim?
-___________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/ex_nim.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/ex_nim.png" alt="I stopped using Nim because..." style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Again, this question got a lot of "Other" answers. Apart from that, the
-most popular reason for leaving Nim is that it is not stable. Followed by the
-a lack of needed libraries and packages and the instability of the
-standard library.
-
-* Lack of IDE support.
-* Style insensitive.
-* Documentation.
-* Dislike the syntax.
-* Community is too small.
-* Missing language features (for example RAII).
-* No opportunities to use it at work.
-* Messy standard library.
-
-The first item, "Lack of IDE support", was mentioned by multiple respondents.
-In the future we should look into ensuring that major IDEs have plugins which
-enable easy Nim development.
-
-Based on some of the "Other" answers, it seems that many of the respondents
-have not used Nim for very long, for example many respondents complained about
-installation issues which they would have run into before getting a chance to
-use Nim. Because of this I would consider them not
-ex-Nim users but developers that have not had a chance to try Nim fully.
-Next time we should also ask how long the respondent has used Nim for to get a
-better idea of whether they had a chance to use Nim for extended periods of
-time.
-
-Non-Nim users
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-We also wanted to know the reasons why developers decided against using Nim.
-
-Why do you not use Nim?
-_______________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/non_user.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/non_user.png" alt="I don't use Nim because..." style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-The most common reason that people have for not using Nim is that it is
-not yet ready for production. Thankfully this will improve with time.
-IDE support is also a prominent factor just as we've seen in previous results.
-
-There is also a lot of "Other" answers, let's have a look at a selection of
-them. Some of the most prominent ones, in order of frequency, include:
-
-* No time to use/learn it
-* Syntax
-* Documentation is incomplete
-* Garbage Collection
-* Prefer functional paradigm
-* Small community
-* Style insensitivity/Case insensitivity
-
-One respondent made a very good suggestion: they said that the
-"Do you use Nim?" question should have included "No, but I intend to" as
-an answer. Definitely something we will do in the next survey. Indeed, many
-respondents mentioned that they were planning on trying out Nim but that they
-just have no time to do so, this is very encouraging!
-
-Learning Resources
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-We wanted to get an idea of how Nim users are learning Nim. Every respondent
-answered this question, no matter what they answered for the "Do you use Nim?"
-question.
-
-Which learning resources, if any, did you use to learn Nim?
-___________________________________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/learning_resources.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/learning_resources.png" alt="learning resources" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-The idea behind this question was to understand which learning resources
-were most popular among our user base. The
-`Nim tutorial <http://nim-lang.org/docs/tut1.html>`_ is by far the most
-popular. In previous questions, we saw respondents mentioning that the Nim
-tutorial does not go into enough detail about Nim. Thanks to this information
-we can come to the conclusion that the tutorial needs to be improved
-significantly to make sure that it gives our users the necessary information
-to use Nim effectively.
-
-Indeed, many users also use the
-`Nim manual <http://nim-lang.org/docs/manual.html>`_ to learn Nim.
-This manual has been
-written as a specification and so is not ideal for teaching Nim. Many of
-the concepts in the Nim manual need to be explained in a lot more detail in
-the Nim tutorial.
-
-Of course, it's exciting to see our respondents using other materials to learn
-Nim. In particular I am excited to see that over 15% of the respondents have
-used
-`Nim in Action <https://manning.com/books/nim-in-action?a_aid=niminaction&a_bid=78a27e81>`_
-to learn Nim. I expect that more and more users will pick up the book after it
-is fully published.
-
-Nim in Action
-_____________
-
-As the author of
-`Nim in Action <https://manning.com/books/nim-in-action?a_aid=niminaction&a_bid=78a27e81>`_,
-I wanted to get some statistics surrounding
-my book. With this in mind, I have created some questions relating to it.
-
-Have you read Nim in Action?
-____________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/book.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/book.png" alt="Have you read Nim in Action?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-It's good to see that over 50% of respondents have read the book or are at least
-planning to read it. Keep in mind that this question was answered by all
-respondents, not just Nim users.
-
-.. container:: standout
-
-  Are you interested in purchasing a copy of
-  `Nim in Action <https://manning.com/books/nim-in-action?a_aid=niminaction&a_bid=78a27e81>`_?
-  If so, you can use code ``wm090416lt`` to get 50% off the printed book today only!
-  If you purchase it now you will get access to an early access copy of
-  Nim in Action in eBook form and will be able to take part in the development
-  of this book.
-
-Did you enjoy Nim in Action?
-____________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/book_opinion.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/book_opinion.png" alt="Did you enjoy Nim in Action?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Of the people that read Nim in Action it's nice to see that almost 70% have
-enjoyed it.
-
-Nim's future
-~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-What improvements are needed before Nim v1.0 can be released?
-_____________________________________________________________
-
-We were interested to know what our users believe is needed before
-Nim version 1.0 can be released.
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/10_needs.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/10_needs.png" alt="What is needed before 1.0 can be released?" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-It appears that the standard library is the biggest concern. With more than half
-of all respondents selecting "The standard library needs to reviewed and
-any problems with it fixed". This is in fact something we are already planning
-to address, so it's good to see that the majority agrees with us.
-
-A large proportion of users also believes that the language is great as-is
-and that we should focus on stabilising the compiler. This somewhat contradicts
-the majority. But perhaps most of them thought that "The language" excludes the
-standard library.
-
-For this question, we decided to give our respondents a dedicated place to
-give general feedback about what they feel is needed before v1.0 can be
-released. We received over 200 responses to that. Many of these responses
-reflect what we have already seen: that the documentation needs to improve,
-that we need a good Nim IDE, stability for experimental features such as
-concepts, the standard library needs to be cleaned up.
-
-Unfortunately many respondents used this question to say what needs to be fixed
-in Nim in general, not what is definitely necessary before 1.0 can be released.
-
-Community demographics
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-
-What domain do you work in currently?
-_____________________________________
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/domains.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/domains.png" alt="Work domains" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-
-Nim users are working in a wide variety of domains. It is encouraging to see
-people from so many different backgrounds taking part in this survey.
-
-What programming languages are you most comfortable with?
-_________________________________________________________
-
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <a href="../assets/news/images/survey/languages.png">
-    <img src="../assets/news/images/survey/languages.png" alt="Programming languages" style="width:100%"/>
-  </a>
-
-Python and C are the top two programming languages that our respondents are
-most comfortable with. This is not altogether surprising.
-
-Last words
-~~~~~~~~~~
-
-At the end of the survey we gave our respondents a chance to speak their mind
-about anything they wish, with a simple question: "Anything else you'd like
-to tell us?"
-
-There was a lot of great feedback given in this question from people who
-obviously really care deeply about Nim. There is too much to outline here,
-but rest assurred that we will take it all into account and do our best to
-act on it.
-
-In addition to feedback, we were also overwhelmed by the amount of positive
-comments in the answers to this
-question. There was a lot of support from the community thanking us for our
-work and determination.
-
-I'll let some quotes speak for themselves:
-
-.. raw::html
-
-  <blockquote>You rock, seriously.</blockquote>
-  <blockquote>Nim rocks! Keep it up! Thank you very much!</blockquote>
-  <blockquote>You've made great progress on the language without any corporate backing, that is amazing. I wish Nim becomes one of the top used languages in a few years.</blockquote>
-  <blockquote>Nim is elegant and wonderful! Keep at it!</blockquote>
-
-Our community is truly brilliant. We thank each and every one of you for
-filling out this survey and hope that you will help us tackle some of the
-challenges that face Nim.
-
-This survey was a good place to give us feedback, but please don't wait for
-the next one. We are always looking to hear more from you and we hope that you
-will participate in discussions relating to this survey as well the future
-of Nim.
-
-Thanks for reading, and have a good day!