| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
| |
refs #7382, caused by #24005
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes a logic error in #23870
The inheritance penalty should be -1 if there is no inheritance
relationship. Not sure how to write a test case for this one honestly.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #22276
When matching against `tyFromExpr`, the compiler tries to instantiate it
then operates on the potentially instantiated type. But the way it does
this is inverted, it checks if the instantiated type matches the
argument type, not if the argument type matches the instantiated type.
This has been the case since
https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/commit/ac271e76b18110bea8046af64ceccd6b804978dd#diff-251afcd01d239369019495096c187998dd6695b6457528953237a7e4a10f7138,
which doesn't comment on it, so I'm guessing this isn't intended. I
don't know if it would break anything though.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
split again from #24038, fixes
https://github.com/status-im/nimbus-eth2/pull/6554#issuecomment-2354977102
`var`/pointer types are no longer implicitly convertible to each other
if their element types either:
* require an int conversion or another conversion operation as long as
it's not to `openarray`,
* are subtypes with pointer indirection,
Previously any conversion below a subrange match would match if the
element type wasn't a pointer type, then it would error later in
`analyseIfAddressTaken`.
Different from #24038 in that the preview define that made subrange
matches also fail to match is removed for a simpler diff so that it can
be backported.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #24121
Proc arguments can have typeclass type like `Foo | Bar` that `sigmatch`
handles specially before matching them to the param type, because they
wouldn't match otherwise. Not exactly sure why this existed but matching
any typeclass or unresolved type in generic contexts now fails the match
so typing the call is delayed until instantiation.
Also it turns out default values with `tyFromExpr` type depending on
other parameters was never tested, this also needs a patch to make the
`tyFromExpr` type `tfNonConstExpr` so it doesn't try to evaluate the
other parameter at compile time.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes regression remaining after #24092
In #24092 `prepareNode` was updated so it wouldn't try to instantiate
generic type symbols (like `Generic` when `type Generic[T] = object`,
and `prepareNode` is what `tyFromExpr` uses in most of the compiler. An
exception is in sigmatch, which is now changed to use `prepareNode` to
make generic type symbols work in the same way as usual. However this
requires another change to work:
Dot fields and matches to `typedesc` on generic types generate
`tyFromExpr` in generic contexts since #24005, including generic type
symbols. But this means when we try to instantiate the `tyFromExpr` in
sigmatch, which increases `c.inGenericContext` for potentially remaining
unresolved expressions, dotcalls stay as `tyFromExpr` and so never
match. To fix this, we change the "generic type" check in dot fields and
`typedesc` matching to an "unresolved type" check which excludes generic
body types; and for generic body types, we only generate `tyFromExpr` if
the dot field is a generic parameter of the generic type (so that it
gets resolved only at instantiation).
Notes for the future:
* Sigmatch shouldn't have to `inc c.inGenericContext`, if a `tyFromExpr`
can't instantiate it's fine if we just fail the match (i.e. redirect the
instantiation errors from `semtypinst` to a match failure). Then again
maybe this is the best way to check for inability to instantiate.
* The `elif c.inGenericContext > 0 and t.containsUnresolvedType` check
in dotfields could maybe be simplified to just checking for `tyFromExpr`
and `tyGenericParam`, but I don't know if this is an exhaustive list.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Caught in https://github.com/metagn/applicates, I'm not sure which
commit causes this but it's also in the 2.0 branch (but not 2.0.2), so
it's not any recent PRs.
If a proc has a static parameter with type `static Foo[T]`, then another
parameter with type `static Bar[T, U]`, the generic instantiation for
`Bar` doesn't match `U` which has type `tyGenericParam`, but matches `T`
since it has type `tyTypeDesc`. The reason is that `concreteType`
returns the type itself for `tyTypeDesc` if `c.isNoCall` (i.e. matching
a generic invocation), but returns `nil` for `tyGenericParam`. I'm
guessing `tyGenericParam` is received here because of #22618, but that
doesn't explain why `T` is still `tyTypeDesc`. I'm not sure.
Regardless, we can just copy the behavior for `tyTypeDesc` to
`tyGenericParam` and also return the type itself when `c.isNoCall`. This
feels like it defeats the purpose of `concreteType` but the way it's
used doesn't make sense without it (generic param can't match another
generic param?). Alternatively we could loosen the `if concrete == nil:
return isNone` checks in some places for specific conditions, whether
`c.isNoCall` or `c.inGenericContext == 0` (though this would need
#24005).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #16700, fixes #20916, refs #24010
Fixes the instantiation issues for proc param default values encountered
in #24010 by:
1. semchecking generic default param values with `inGenericContext` for
#22029 and followups to apply (the bigger change in semtypes),
2. rejecting explicit generic instantiations with unresolved generic
types inside `inGenericContext` (sigmatch change),
3. instantiating the default param values using `prepareNode` rather
than an insufficient manual method (the bigger change in seminst).
This had an important side effect of references to other parameters not
working since they would be resolved as a symbol belonging to the
uninstantiated original generic proc rather than the later instantiated
proc. There is a more radical way to fix this which is generating ident
nodes with `tyFromExpr` in specifically this context, but instead we
just count them as belonging to the same proc in
`hoistParamsUsedInDefault`.
Other minor bugfixes:
* To make the error message in t20883 make sense, we now give a "cannot
instantiate" error when trying to instantiate a proc generic param with
`tyFromExpr`.
* Object constructors as default param values generated default values
of private fields going through `evalConstExpr` more than once, but the
VM doesn't mark the object fields as `nfSkipFieldChecking` which gives a
"cannot access field" error. So the VM now marks object fields it
generates as `nfSkipFieldChecking`. Not sure if this affects VM
performance, don't see why it would.
* The nkRecWhen changes in #24042 didn't cover the case where all
conditions are constantly false correctly, this is fixed with a minor
change. This isn't needed for this PR now but I encountered it after
forgetting to `dec c.inGenericContext`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #24044
When matching a `tyFromExpr` against a `static` generic parameter,
`paramTypesMatch` tries to evaluate it as a constant expression, which
causes a segfault in the case of #24044. In #24005 a consequence of the
same behavior was an issue where `nkStaticExpr` was created for
`tyFromExpr` which made it not instantiate, so only the generation of
`nkStaticExpr` was disabled. Instead we now just completely ignore
`tyFromExpr` matching a `static` generic parameter in generic contexts
and keep it untouched.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #16376
The way the compiler handled generic proc instantiations in calls (like
`foo[int](...)`) up to this point was to instantiate `foo[int]`, create
a symbol for the instantiated proc (or a symchoice for multiple procs
excluding ones with mismatching generic param counts), then perform
overload resolution on this symbol/symchoice. The exception to this was
when the called symbol was already a symchoice node, in which case it
wasn't instantiated and overloading was called directly ([these
lines](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/b7b1313d21deb687adab2b4a162e716ba561a26b/compiler/semexprs.nim#L3366-L3371)).
This has several problems:
* Templates and macros can't create instantiated symbols, so they
couldn't participate in overloaded explicit generic instantiations,
causing the issue #16376.
* Every single proc that can be instantiated with the given generic
params is fully instantiated including the body. #9997 is about this but
isn't fixed here since the instantiation isn't in a call.
The way overload resolution handles explicit instantiations by itself is
also buggy:
* It doesn't check constraints.
* It allows only partially providing the generic parameters, which makes
sense for implicit generics, but can cause ambiguity in overloading.
Here is how this PR deals with these problems:
* Overload resolution now always handles explicit generic instantiations
in calls, in `initCandidate`, as long as the symbol resolves to a
routine symbol.
* Overload resolution now checks the generic params for constraints and
correct parameter count (ignoring implicit params). If these don't
match, the entire overload is considered as not matching and not
instantiated.
* Special error messages are added for mismatching/missing/extra generic
params. This is almost all of the diff in `semcall`.
* Procs with matching generic parameters now instantiate only the type
of the signature in overload resolution, not the proc itself, which also
works for templates and macros.
Unfortunately we can't entirely remove instantiations because overload
resolution can't handle some cases with uninstantiated types even though
it's resolved in the binding (see the last 2 blocks in
`texplicitgenerics`). There are also some instantiation issues with
default params that #24005 didn't fix but I didn't want this to become
the 3rd huge generics PR in a row so I didn't dive too deep into trying
to fix them. There is still a minor instantiation fix in `semtypinst`
though for subscripts in calls.
Additional changes:
* Overloading of `[]` wasn't documented properly, it somewhat is now
because we need to mention the limitation that it can't be done for
generic procs/types.
* Tests can now enable the new type mismatch errors with just
`-d:testsConciseTypeMismatch` in the command.
Package PRs:
- using fork for now:
[combparser](https://github.com/PMunch/combparser/pull/7) (partial
generic instantiation)
- merged: [cligen](https://github.com/c-blake/cligen/pull/233) (partial
generic instantiation but non-overloaded + template)
- merged: [neo](https://github.com/andreaferretti/neo/pull/56) (trying
to instantiate template with no generic param)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
updated version of #22193
After #22029 and the followups #23983 and #24005 which fixed issues with
it, `tyFromExpr` no longer match any proc params in generic type bodies
but delay all non-matching calls until the type is instantiated.
Previously the mechanism `fauxMatch` was used to pretend that any
failing match against `tyFromExpr` actually matched, but prevented the
instantiation of the type until later.
Since this mechanism is not needed anymore for `tyFromExpr`, it is now
only used for `tyError` to prevent cascading errors and changed to a
bool field for simplicity. A change in `semtypes` was also needed to
prevent calling `fitNode` on default param values resolving to type
`tyFromExpr` in generic procs for params with non-generic types, as this
would try to coerce the expression into a concrete type when it can't be
instantiated yet.
The aliases `tyProxy` and `tyUnknown` for `tyError` and `tyFromExpr` are
also removed for uniformity.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
int types (#24017)
This is a very niche case encountered in #24012, where an int literal
got a `range` type as a result of a generic instantiation (in
`tgenericcomputedrange`), I can't think of another test case. The base
type of the range being `int` made it match `int` with `isSubrange` as
in the first `if` branch, but other int types like `int32` matched with
`isFromIntLit` which is a better match.
Instead, int literals with range type now:
1. match their base type with `isFromIntLit`,
2. don't match other int types with `isFromIntLit`, instead giving
`isConvertible` as in the last `if` branch in `handleRange`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(#24005)
fixes #4228, fixes #4990, fixes #7006, fixes #7008, fixes #8406, fixes
#8551, fixes #11112, fixes #20027, fixes #22647, refs #23854 and #23855
(remaining issue fixed), refs #8545 (works properly now with
`cast[static[bool]]` changed to `cast[bool]`), refs #22342 and #22607
(disabled tests added), succeeds #23194
Parameter and return type nodes in generic procs now undergo the same
`inGenericContext` treatment that nodes in generic type bodies do. This
allows many of the fixes in #22029 and followups to also apply to
generic proc signatures. Like #23983 however this needs some more
compiler fixes, but this time mostly in `sigmatch` and type
instantiations.
1. `tryReadingGenericParam` no longer treats `tyCompositeTypeClass` like
a concrete type anymore, so expressions like `Foo.T` where `Foo` is a
generic type don't look for a parameter of `Foo` in non-generic code
anymore. It also doesn't generate `tyFromExpr` in non-generic code for
any generic LHS. This is to handle a very specific case in `asyncmacro`
which used `FutureVar.astToStr` where `FutureVar` is generic.
2. The `tryResolvingStaticExpr` call when matching `tyFromExpr` in
sigmatch now doesn't consider call nodes in general unresolved, only
nodes with `tyFromExpr` type, which is emitted on unresolved expressions
by increasing `c.inGenericContext`. `c.inGenericContext == 0` is also
now required to attempt instantiating `tyFromExpr`. So matching against
`tyFromExpr` in proc signatures works in general now, but I'm
speculating it depends on constant folding in `semExpr` for statics to
match against it properly.
3. `paramTypesMatch` now doesn't try to change nodes with `tyFromExpr`
type into `tyStatic` type when fitting to a static type, because it
doesn't need to, they'll be handled the same way (this was a workaround
in place of the static type instantiation changes, only one of the
fields in the #22647 test doesn't work with it).
4. `tyStatic` matching now uses `inferStaticParam` instead of just range
type matching, so `Foo[N div 2]` can infer `N` in the same way `array[N
div 2, int]` can. `inferStaticParam` also disabled itself if the
inferred static param type already had a node, but `makeStaticExpr`
generates static types with unresolved nodes, so we only disable it if
it also doesn't have a binding. This might not work very well but the
static type instantiation changes should really lower the amount of
cases where it's encountered.
5. Static types now undergo type instantiation. Previously the branch
for `tyStatic` in `semtypinst` was a no-op, now it acts similarly to
instantiating any other type with the following differences:
- Other types only need instantiation if `containsGenericType` is true,
static types also get instantiated if their value node isn't a literal
node. Ideally any value node that is "already evaluated" should be
ignored, but I'm not sure of a better way to check this, maybe if
`evalConstExpr` emitted a flag. This is purely for optimization though.
- After instantiation, `semConstExpr` is called on the value node if
`not cl.allowMetaTypes` and the type isn't literally a `static` type.
Then the type of the node is set to the base type of the static type to
deal with `semConstExpr` stripping abstract types.
We need to do this because calls like `foo(N)` where `N` is `static int`
and `foo`'s first parameter is just `int` do not generate `tyFromExpr`,
they are fully typed and so `makeStaticExpr` is called on them, giving a
static type with an unresolved node.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
types in symchoices (#23997)
fixes #23898, supersedes #23966 and #23990
Since #20631 ambiguous type symbols in templates are rejected outright,
now we generate a symchoice for type nodes if they're ambiguous, a
generalization of what was done in #22375. This is done for generics as
well. Symchoices also handle type symbols better now, ensuring their
type is a `typedesc` type; this probably isn't necessary for everything
to work but it makes the logic more robust.
Similar to #23989, we have to prepare for the fact that ambiguous type
symbols behave differently than normal type symbols and either error
normally or relegate to other routine symbols if the symbol is being
called. Generating a symchoice emulates this behavior, `semExpr` will
find the type symbol first, but since the symchoice has other symbols,
it will count as an ambiguous type symbol.
I know it seems spammy to carry around an ambiguity flag everywhere, but
in the future when we have something like #23104 we could just always
generate a symchoice, and the symchoice itself would carry the info of
whether the first symbol was ambiguous. But this could harm compiler
performance/memory use, it might be better to generate it only when we
have to, which in the case of type symbols is only when they're
ambiguous.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #21258
When a generic proc is instantiated, if one of the default values
doesn't match the type of the parameter, `seminst` sets the default
parameter node to an `nkEmpty` node with `tyError` type. `sigmatch`
checks for this to give an error message if the default param is
actually used, but only while actively matching the proc signature,
before the proc is even instantiated. The error message also gives very
little information.
Now, we check for this in `updateDefaultParams` at the end of
`semResolvedCall`, after the proc has been instantiated. The `nkEmpty`
node also is given the original mismatching type instead rather than
`tyError`, only setting `tyError` after erroring to prevent cascading
errors. The error message is changed to the standard type mismatch error
also giving the instantiation info of the routine.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #23406, closes #23854, closes #23855 (test code of both compiles
but separate issue exists), refs #23432, follows #23411
In generic bodies, previously all regular `nkCall` nodes like `foo(a,
b)` were directly treated as generic statements and delayed immediately,
but other call kinds like `a.foo(b)`, `foo a, b` etc underwent
typechecking before making sure they have to be delayed, as implemented
in #22029. Since the behavior for `nkCall` was slightly buggy (as in
#23406), the behavior for all call kinds is now to call `semTypeExpr`.
However the vast majority of calls in generic bodies out there are
`nkCall`, and while there isn't a difference in the expected behavior,
this exposes many issues with the implementation started in #22029 given
how much more code uses it now. The portion of these issues that CI has
caught are fixed in this PR but it's possible there are more.
1. Deref expressions, dot expressions and calls to dot expressions now
handle and propagate `tyFromExpr`. This is most of the changes in
`semexprs`.
2. For deref expressions to work in `typeof`, a new type flag
`tfNonConstExpr` is added for `tyFromExpr` that calls `semExprWithType`
with `efInTypeof` on the expression instead of `semConstExpr`. This type
flag is set for every `tyFromExpr` type of a node that `prepareNode`
encounters, so that the node itself isn't evaluated at compile time when
just trying to get the type of the node.
3. Unresolved `static` types matching `static` parameters is now treated
the same as unresolved generic types matching `typedesc` parameters in
generic type bodies, it causes a failed match which delays the call
instantiation.
4. `typedesc` parameters now reject all types containing unresolved
generic types like `seq[T]`, not just generic param types by themselves.
(using `containsGenericType`)
5. `semgnrc` now doesn't leave generic param symbols it encounters in
generic type contexts as just identifiers, and instead turns them into
symbol nodes. Normally in generic procs, this isn't a problem since the
generic param symbols will be provided again at instantiation time (and
in fact creating symbol nodes causes issues since `seminst` doesn't
actually instantiate proc body node types).
But generic types can try to be instantiated early in `sigmatch` which
will give an undeclared identifier error when the param is not provided.
Nodes in generic types (specifically in `tyFromExpr` which should be the
only use for `semGenericStmt`) undergo full generic type instantiation
with `prepareNode`, so there is no issue of these symbols remaining as
uninstantiated generic types.
6. `prepareNode` now has more logic for which nodes to avoid
instantiating.
Subscripts and subscripts turned into calls to `[]` by `semgnrc` need to
avoid instantiating the first operand, since it may be a generic body
type like `Generic` in an expression like `Generic[int]`.
Dot expressions cannot instantiate their RHS as it may be a generic proc
symbol or even an undeclared identifier for generic param fields, but
have to instantiate their LHS, so calls and subscripts need to still
instantiate their first node if it's a dot expression.
This logic still isn't perfect and needs the same level of detail as in
`semexprs` for which nodes can be left as "untyped" for overloading/dot
exprs/subscripts to handle, but should handle the majority of cases.
Also the `efDetermineType` requirement for which calls become
`tyFromExpr` is removed and as a result `efDetermineType` is entirely
unused again.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #8697, fixes #9620, fixes #23265
When matching a `template` with an `untyped` argument fails because of a
mismatching typed argument, `presentFailedCandidates` tries to sem every
single argument to show their types, but trying to type the `untyped`
argument can fail if it's supposed to use an injected symbol, so we get
an unrelated error message like "undeclared identifier".
Instead we use `tryExpr` as the comment suggests, setting the type to
`untyped` if it fails to compile. We could also maybe check if an
`untyped` argument is expected in its place and not try to compile the
expression if it is but this would require a bit of reorganizing the
code here and IMO it's better to have the information of what type it
would be if it can be typed.
|
| |
|
| |
The test case diff is self explanatory
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ref https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/23836#issuecomment-2233957324
Their types are basically equivalent so they should behave the same way
for type relations.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #19819, fixes #23339
Since #22029 `tyFromExpr` does not match anything in overloading, so
generic bodies can know which call expressions to delay until the type
can be evaluated. However generic type invocations also run overloading
to check for generic constraints even in generic bodies. To prevent them
from failing early from the overload not matching, pretend that
`tyFromExpr` matches. This mirrors the behavior of the compiler in more
basic cases like:
```nim
type
Foo[T: int] = object
x: T
Bar[T] = object
y: Foo[T]
```
Unfortunately this case doesn't respect the constraint (#21181, some
other bugs) but `tyFromExpr` should easily use the same principle when
it does.
|
| |
|
| |
#23823
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#23755
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
fixes #22409
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This fixes an oversight with a change that I made a while ago.
Basically, these two snippets should both compile. Currently the
`varargs` version will fail.
```nim
template s(d: typed)=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s(something)
```
```nim
template s(d: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s(something)
```
Potentially unrelated, but this works currently for some reason:
```nim
template s(a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s:
something
```
also, this works:
```nim
template s(b:untyped, a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s (g: int):
something
```
but this doesn't, and the error message is not what I would expect:
```nim
template s(b:untyped, a: varargs[typed])=discard
proc something()=discard
proc something(x:int)=discard
s (g: int), something
```
So far as I can tell, none of these issues persist for me after the code
changes in this PR.
|
| |
|
| |
fixes #23249
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #18125
Previously a tuple type like `(T, int)` would match an expected tuple
type `(U, int)` if `T` is a subtype of `U`. This is wrong since the
codegen does not handle type conversions of individual tuple elements in
a type conversion of an entire tuple. For this reason the compiler
already does not accept `(float, int)` for a matched type `(int, int)`,
however the code that checked for which relations are unacceptable
checked for `< isSubtype` rather than `<= isSubtype`, so subtypes were
not included in the unacceptable relations.
Update: Now only considered unacceptable when inheritance is used, as in
[`paramTypesMatch`](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/3379d26629f30e6be8d303a36e220d1039eb4551/compiler/sigmatch.nim#L2252-L2254).
Ideally subtype relations that don't need conversions, like `nil`,
`seq[empty]`, `range[0..5]` etc would be their own relation
`isConcreteSubtype` (which would also allow us to differentiate with
`openArray[T]`), but this is too big of a refactor for now.
To compensate for this making things like `let x: (Parent, int) =
(Child(), 0)` not compile (they would crash codegen before anyway but
should still work in principle), type inference for tuple constructors
is updated such that they call `fitNode` on the fields and their
expected types, so a type conversion is generated for the individual
subtype element.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #23200, fixes #18866
#21065 made it so `auto` proc return types remained as `tyAnything` and
not turned to `tyUntyped`. This had the side effect that anything
previously bound to `tyAnything` in the proc type match was then bound
to the proc return type, which is wrong since we don't know the proc
return type even if we know the expected parameter types (`tyUntyped`
also [does not care about its previous bindings in
`typeRel`](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/ab4278d2179639f19967431a7aa1be858046f7a7/compiler/sigmatch.nim#L1059-L1061)
maybe for this reason).
Now we mark `tyAnything` return types for routines as `tfRetType` [as
done for other meta return
types](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/18b5fb256d4647efa6a64df451d37129d36e96f3/compiler/semtypes.nim#L1451),
and ignore bindings to `tyAnything` + `tfRetType` types in `semtypinst`.
On top of this, we reset the type relation in `paramTypesMatch` only
after creating the instantiation (instead of trusting
`isInferred`/`isInferredConvertible` before creating the instantiation),
using the same mechanism that `isBothMetaConvertible` uses.
This fixes the issues as well as making the disabled t15386_2 test
introduced in #21065 work. As seen in the changes for the other tests,
the error messages give an obscure `proc (a: GenericParam): auto` now,
but it does give the correct error that the overload doesn't match
instead of matching the overload pre-emptively and expecting a specific
return type.
tsugar had to be changed due to #16906, which is the problem where
`void` is not inferred in the case where `result` was never touched.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
statics (#23188)
fixes #23186
As explained in #23186, generics can transform `genericProc[int]` into a
call `` `[]`(genericProc, int) `` which causes a problem when
`genericProc` is resemmed, since it is not a resolved generic proc. `[]`
needs unresolved generic procs since `mArrGet` also handles explicit
generic instantiations, so delay the resolved generic proc check to
`semFinishOperands` which is intentionally not called for `mArrGet`.
The root issue for
[t6137](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/devel/tests/generics/t6137.nim)
is also fixed (because this change breaks it otherwise), the compiler
doesn't consider the possibility that an assigned generic param can be
an unresolved static value (note the line `if t.kind == tyStatic: s.ast
= t.n` below the change in sigmatch), now it properly errors that it
couldn't instantiate it as it would for a type param. ~~The change in
semtypinst is just for symmetry with the code above it which also gives
a `cannot instantiate` error, it may or may not be necessary/correct.~~
Now removed, I don't think it was correct.
Still possible that this has unintended consequences.
|
| |
|
| |
#23172
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is in reference to a [feature
request](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/issues/22142) that I posted.
I'm making this PR to demonstrate the suggested change and expect that
this should be scrutinized
---------
Co-authored-by: Bung <crc32@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #23002, fixes #22841, refs comments in #23097
When an identifier is ambiguous in scope (i.e. multiple imports contain
symbols with the same name), attempt resolving it through type inference
(by creating a symchoice). To do this efficiently, `qualifiedLookUp` had
to be broken up so that `semExpr` can access the ambiguous candidates
directly (now obtained directly via `lookUpCandidates`).
This fixes the linked issues, but an example like:
```nim
let on = 123
{.warning[ProveInit]: on.}
```
will still fail, since `on` is unambiguously the local `let` symbol here
(this is also true for `proc on` but `proc` symbols generate symchoices
anyway).
Type symbols are not considered to not confuse the type inference. This
includes the change in sigmatch, up to this point symchoices with
nonoverloadable symbols could be created, they just wouldn't be
considered during disambiguation. Now every proper symbol except types
are considered in disambiguation, so the correct symbols must be picked
during the creation of the symchoice node. I remember there being a
violating case of this in the compiler, but this was very likely fixed
by excluding type symbols as CI seems to have found no issues.
The pure enum ambiguity test was disabled because ambiguous pure enums
now behave like overloadable enums with this behavior, so we get a
longer error message for `echo amb` like `type mismatch: got <MyEnum |
OtherEnum> but expected T`
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Filling in some more logic in `typeRel` that I came across when poking
the compiler in another PR. Some of the cases where `typeRel` returns an
"incorrect" result are actually common, but `sumGeneric` ends up
breaking the tie correctly. There isn't anything wrong with that
necessarily, but I assume that it's preferred these functions behave
just as well in isolation as they do when integrated.
I will be following up this description with specific examples.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
#23032
---------
Co-authored-by: Nikolay Nikolov <nickysn@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pylgos <43234674+Pylgos@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ringabout <43030857+ringabout@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jason Beetham <beefers331@gmail.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
(#23063)
… type mirroring proc params
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Just makes the case statements easier to look at when folded
```nim
case foo
of a:
of b:
of c:
else:
case bar:
of a:
of b:
of c:
of d:
else:
```
to
```nim
case foo
of a:
of b:
of c:
else:
case bar:
of a:
of b:
of c:
of d:
else:
```
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
| |
follow up https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/pull/22851
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The goal of this PR is to make `typeRel` accurate to it's definition for
generics:
```
# 3) When used with two type classes, it will check whether the types
# matching the first type class (aOrig) are a strict subset of the types matching
# the other (f). This allows us to compare the signatures of generic procs in
# order to give preferrence to the most specific one:
```
I don't want this PR to break any code, and I want to preserve all of
Nims current behaviors. I think that making this more accurate will help
serve as ground work for the future. It may not be possible to not break
anything but this is my attempt.
So that it is understood, this code was part of another PR (#22143) but
that problem statement only needed this change by extension. It's more
organized to split two problems into two PRs and this issue, being
non-breaking, should be a more immediate improvement.
---------
Co-authored-by: Andreas Rumpf <rumpf_a@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
| |
fixes #10542
revives and close #20169
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Close #21742
Checking if there's any side-effects and if just changing typeRel is
adequate for this issue before trying to look into related ones.
`skipBoth` is also not that great, it can lead to code that works
sometimes but fails when the proc is instantiated with branching
aliases. This is mostly an issue with error clarity though.
---------
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <unknown>
Co-authored-by: SirOlaf <>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
reverts #22642, reopens #22639, closes #22646, refs #22650, refs
https://github.com/alaviss/union/issues/51, refs #22652
The fallout is too much from #22642, we can come back to it if we can
account for all the affected code.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
fixes #22639
A `tyGenericInst` has its last son as the instantiated body of the
original generic type. However this type keeps its original `sym` field
from the original generic types, which means the sym's type is
uninstantiated. This causes problems in the implementation of `getType`,
where it uses the `sym` fields of types to represent them in AST, the
relevant example for the issue being
[here](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/d13aab50cf465a7f2edf9c37a4fa30e128892e72/compiler/vmdeps.nim#L191)
called from
[here](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/d13aab50cf465a7f2edf9c37a4fa30e128892e72/compiler/vmdeps.nim#L143).
To fix this, create a new symbol from the original symbol for the
instantiated body during the creation of `tyGenericInst`s with the
appropriate type. Normally `replaceTypeVarsS` would be used for this,
but here it seems to cause some recursion issue (immediately gives an
error like "cannot instantiate HSlice[T, U]"), so we directly set the
symbol's type to the instantiated type.
Avoiding recursion means we also cannot use `replaceTypeVarsN` for the
symbol AST, and the symbol not having any AST crashes the implementation
of `getType` again
[here](https://github.com/nim-lang/Nim/blob/d13aab50cf465a7f2edf9c37a4fa30e128892e72/compiler/vmdeps.nim#L167),
so the symbol AST is set to the original generic type AST for now which
is what it was before anyway.
Not sure about this because not sure why the recursion issue is
happening, putting it at the end of the proc doesn't help either. Also
not sure if the `cl.owner != nil and s.owner != cl.owner` condition from
`replaceTypeVarsS` is relevant here. This might also break some code if
it depended on the original generic type symbol being given.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* `initCandidate` and friends now return values
* fixes semexprs.nim
* fixes semcall.nim
* Update compiler/semcall.nim
|