| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
| |
don't have an explicit `.raises` pragma (#23193)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* basic stability improvements; refs nimsuggest
* fixed dot operator recursive loop & macro suggest
* hacky fix for run away dot operator sem check
Committing this mostly to make the issue more clear. Perhaps get better
feedback.
* semExprWithType seems like a better place to check
* fixed error messages const case expressions
* Clean-up test
* stopped the dot operator madness
No longer get infinite recursion when seming broken code with a dot
operator macro like in jsffi.
Co-authored-by: Araq <rumpf_a@web.de>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A number of nimsuggest tests were disabled for various reasons, sometimes due
to brittleness. These tests have been fixed where needed and most have are now
enabled -- details below. The updates are meant to provide better regression
coverage for future nimsuggest improvements. To avoid brittleness some tests
were refactored.
Impact:
* test coverage has now increased
* faster execution of the test suite
* tests are less likely to break due to stdlib changes
Re-enabled Test & Test Description:
* `tchk1.nim`: check (chk) via nimsuggest works at end of file
* `tdot4.nim`: prioritize already used completion
* `tinclude.nim`: definition lookup (def) with includes
* `tstrutils.nim` -> `tdef2.nim`: test template definition lookup (def)
* `tsug_regression.nim`: regression test for [nimsuggest #52](https://github.com/nim-lang/nimsuggest/issues/52)
* `ttemplate_highlight.nim`: per the file name
* `twithin_macro_prefix.nim`: suggest within a macro with a prefix
Tests Not Re-Enabled:
* `twithin_macro.nim` still disabled as it doesn't provide a good test signal
* EPC highlight tests remain disabled -- requires out of scope tester changes
Additional Notes:
* todos added in comments for follow-up work
|
| | |
|
| |
|