summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/tests/concepts/texplain.nim
blob: 4ec848732956f9e835390a71659b529c39680b91 (plain) (blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
discard """
  cmd: "nim c --verbosity:0 --colors:off $file"
  nimout: '''
Hint: texplain [Processing]
texplain.nim(118, 10) Hint: Non-matching candidates for e(y)
proc e(i: int): int

texplain.nim(121, 7) Hint: Non-matching candidates for e(10)
proc e(o: ExplainedConcept): int
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: 'foo'
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(84, 5) ExplainedConcept: concept predicate failed
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: 'bar'
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(84, 5) ExplainedConcept: concept predicate failed

texplain.nim(124, 10) Hint: Non-matching candidates for e(10)
proc e(o: ExplainedConcept): int
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: 'foo'
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(84, 6) ExplainedConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(84, 5) ExplainedConcept: concept predicate failed
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: 'bar'
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(85, 6) ExplainedConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(84, 5) ExplainedConcept: concept predicate failed

texplain.nim(128, 20) Error: type mismatch: got <NonMatchingType>
but expected one of:
proc e(o: ExplainedConcept): int
texplain.nim(128, 9) template/generic instantiation of `assert` from here
texplain.nim(84, 5) ExplainedConcept: concept predicate failed
proc e(i: int): int

expression: e(n)
texplain.nim(129, 20) Error: type mismatch: got <NonMatchingType>
but expected one of:
proc r(o: RegularConcept): int
texplain.nim(129, 9) template/generic instantiation of `assert` from here
texplain.nim(88, 5) RegularConcept: concept predicate failed
proc r[T](a: SomeNumber; b: T; c: auto)
proc r(i: string): int

expression: r(n)
texplain.nim(130, 20) Hint: Non-matching candidates for r(y)
proc r[T](a: SomeNumber; b: T; c: auto)
proc r(i: string): int

texplain.nim(138, 2) Error: type mismatch: got <MatchingType>
but expected one of:
proc f(o: NestedConcept)
texplain.nim(88, 6) RegularConcept: undeclared field: 'foo'
texplain.nim(88, 6) RegularConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(88, 6) RegularConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(88, 5) RegularConcept: concept predicate failed
texplain.nim(89, 6) RegularConcept: undeclared field: 'bar'
texplain.nim(89, 6) RegularConcept: undeclared field: '.'
texplain.nim(89, 6) RegularConcept: expression '.' cannot be called
texplain.nim(88, 5) RegularConcept: concept predicate failed
texplain.nim(92, 5) NestedConcept: concept predicate failed

expression: f(y)
'''
  errormsg: "type mismatch: got <MatchingType>"
  line: 138

  disabled: 32bit
"""

# disabled on 32 bit, because the order of suggested alternatives ``r`` differs
# proc r[T](a: SomeNumber; b: T; c: auto)
# proc r(i: string): int
# proc r(o: RegularConcept): int




# line 80 HERE

type
  ExplainedConcept {.explain.} = concept o
    o.foo is int
    o.bar is string

  RegularConcept = concept o
    o.foo is int
    o.bar is string

  NestedConcept = concept o
    o.foo is RegularConcept

  NonMatchingType = object
    foo: int
    bar: int

  MatchingType = object
    foo: int
    bar: string

proc e(o: ExplainedConcept): int = 1
proc e(i: int): int = i

proc r[T](a: SomeNumber, b: T, c: auto) = discard
proc r(o: RegularConcept): int = 1
proc r(i: string): int = 1

proc f(o: NestedConcept) = discard

var n = NonMatchingType(foo: 10, bar: 20)
var y = MatchingType(foo: 10, bar: "bar")

# no diagnostic here:
discard e(y)

# explain that e(int) doesn't match
discard e(y) {.explain.}

# explain that e(ExplainedConcept) doesn't match
echo(e(10) {.explain.}, 20)

# explain that e(ExplainedConcept) doesn't again
discard e(10)

static:
  # provide diagnostics why the compile block failed
  assert(compiles(e(n)) {.explain.} == false)
  assert(compiles(r(n)) {.explain.} == false)
  assert(compiles(r(y)) {.explain.} == true)

  # these should not produce any output
  assert(compiles(r(10)) == false)
  assert(compiles(e(10)) == true)

# finally, provide multiple nested explanations for failed matching
# of regular concepts, even when the explain pragma is not used
f(y)