blob: c621ab17b011268c834da79b7f8939de29bdef76 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
Version 0.8.14
==============
- fix ``m*`` for generics
- optional indentation for 'case' statement
- test the sort implementation again
- export re-entrant and non-reentrant locks and condition vars; threads should
not have an inbox per default
- add --deadlock_prevention:on|off switch? timeout for locks?
- make threadvar efficient again on linux after testing
- ``pure`` --> ``noStackFrame``, ``noRtti``
version 0.9.0
=============
- unsigned ints and bignums
- warning for implicit openArray -> varargs convention
- implement explicit varargs
- tests: run the GC tests
- change overloading resolution
- implement closures; implement proper coroutines
- make exceptions compatible with C++ exceptions
- ``=`` should be overloadable; requires specialization for ``=``
Bugs
----
- bug: generic assign still buggy
- Optimization: If we use a temporary for the result anyway the code gen
should make use of this fact to generate better code...
- bug: memset() without type field initialization?
- special case the generic assign that needs to care about case objects
version 0.9.XX
==============
- GC: marker procs for native Nimrod GC and Boehm GC; precise stack marking
- implicit ref/ptr->var conversion; the compiler may store an object
implicitly on the heap for write barrier efficiency; better:
proc specialization in the code gen
- find a way to reintroduce the cleanup() pass for C code generation: this
is hard because of partial evaluation --> symbol files will fix this as
a side effect
- EcmaScript needs a new and better code gen: simply adapt the C code gen to it
- tlastmod returns wrong results on BSD (Linux, MacOS X: works)
- nested tuple unpacking
- 'nimrod def': does not always work?
- test branch coverage
- checked exceptions
- fix implicit generic routines
- think about ``{:}.toTable[int, string]()``
- nice idea:
p(a, b):
echo a
echo b
is the same as:
p(a, b, proc() =
echo a
echo b)
Library
-------
- proper URL-parser
- wrappers for poppler; libharu
- radix tree for strings; maybe suffix tree
- locale support
- bignums
- ftp (and other internet protocols)
- pdcurses bindings
- for system:
proc `@` [T](a: openArray[T]): seq[T] =
newSeq(result, a.len)
for i in 0..a.len-1: result[i] = a[i]
--> ensure @[] calls the array version!
Low priority
------------
- ``with proc `+`(x, y: T): T`` for generic code
- find a way for easy constructors and destructors; (destructors are much more
important than constructors)
- code generated for type information is wasteful
- resizing of strings/sequences could take into account the memory that
is allocated
Version 2
=========
- language change: inheritance should only work with reference types, so that
the ``type`` field is not needed for objects! --> zero overhead aggregation
BETTER: ``of`` and safe object conversions only work with ref objects. Same
for multi methods.
- explicit nil types?
* nil seq[int]
* nil string
* nil ref int
* nil ptr THallo
* nil proc
- better for backwards compatibility: default nilable, but ``not nil``
notation:
type
PWindow = ref TWindow not nil
The problem with ``nil`` is that the language currently relies on it for
implicit initialization. Initialization is different from assignment. The
issues can "easily" dealt with by ensuring:
var x = myProc() # checks myProc() initializes every pointer explicitely
- the two other parsers
- generalized case statement (requires better transf)
- rethink the syntax: distinction between expr and stmt is unfortunate;
indentation handling is quite complex too; problem with exception handling
is that often the scope of ``try`` is wrong and apart from that ``try`` is
a full blown statement; a ``try`` expression might be a good idea to make
error handling more light-weight
people also want ``inc a; inc b``
|