about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/029tools.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-05-20 22:09:06 -0700
committerKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-05-20 22:11:34 -0700
commit9dcbec398c5aedf27757365cc1f4c7c36e138539 (patch)
tree24afbc29a00db1db5b65eb3c390e8d13df7be3ba /029tools.cc
parent5203ba0c5e806ac8e118362d5e2db952a5433e34 (diff)
downloadmu-9dcbec398c5aedf27757365cc1f4c7c36e138539.tar.gz
2990
Standardize quotes around reagents in error messages.

I'm still sure there's issues. For example, the messages when
type-checking 'copy'. I'm not putting quotes around them because in
layer 60 I end up creating dilated reagents, and then it's a bit much to
have quotes and (two kinds of) brackets. But I'm sure I'm doing that
somewhere..
Diffstat (limited to '029tools.cc')
-rw-r--r--029tools.cc12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/029tools.cc b/029tools.cc
index 364c6260..a7657140 100644
--- a/029tools.cc
+++ b/029tools.cc
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ case TRACE: {
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'trace' should be a number (depth), but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'trace' should be a number (depth), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_literal_string(inst.ingredients.at(1))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'trace' should be a literal string (label), but got " << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'trace' should be a literal string (label), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -203,11 +203,11 @@ case ASSERT: {
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_scalar(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'assert' requires a boolean for its first ingredient, but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'assert' requires a boolean for its first ingredient, but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_literal_string(inst.ingredients.at(1))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'assert' requires a literal string for its second ingredient, but got " << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'assert' requires a literal string for its second ingredient, but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -273,11 +273,11 @@ put(Recipe_ordinal, "$system", _SYSTEM);
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case _SYSTEM: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 1) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'$system' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << to_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'$system' requires exactly one ingredient, but got '" << to_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_literal_string(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "ingredient to '$system' must be a literal text, but got " << to_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "ingredient to '$system' must be a literal text, but got '" << to_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
   }
   break;
 }