2258 - separate warnings from errors

At the lowest level I'm reluctantly starting to see the need for errors
that stop the program in its tracks. Only way to avoid memory corruption
and security issues. But beyond that core I still want to be as lenient
as possible at higher levels of abstraction.

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/039wait.cc b/039wait.cc
index b21f92ca..314ab1cd 100644
--- a/039wait.cc
+++ b/039wait.cc
@@ -95,11 +95,11 @@ Recipe_ordinal["wait-for-routine"] = WAIT_FOR_ROUTINE;
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case WAIT_FOR_ROUTINE: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 1) {
-    raise << maybe(Recipe[r].name) << "'wait-for-routine' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << inst.to_string() << '\n' << end();
+    raise_error << maybe(Recipe[r].name) << "'wait-for-routine' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << inst.to_string() << '\n' << end();
     break;
   }
-  if (!is_mu_scalar(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(Recipe[r].name) << "first ingredient of 'wait-for-routine' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+  if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
+    raise_error << maybe(Recipe[r].name) << "first ingredient of 'wait-for-routine' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ case WAIT_FOR_ROUTINE: {
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations")
 case WAIT_FOR_ROUTINE: {
   if (ingredients.at(0).at(0) == Current_routine->id) {
-    raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "routine can't wait for itself! " << current_instruction().to_string() << '\n' << end();
+    raise_error << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "routine can't wait for itself! " << current_instruction().to_string() << '\n' << end();
     break;
   }
   Current_routine->state = WAITING;