about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/042name.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-03-08 01:30:14 -0800
committerKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-03-08 01:46:47 -0800
commit1ead356219bb2eb59487d1012f837bd07ec336f5 (patch)
treeaf15f390b81e4d6b3e0940c5756a0d7fd1060bb5 /042name.cc
parent27ba0937a3747684f299bb7a8b3cdd0fbb689db3 (diff)
downloadmu-1ead356219bb2eb59487d1012f837bd07ec336f5.tar.gz
2735 - define recipes using 'def'
I'm dropping all mention of 'recipe' terminology from the Readme. That
way I hope to avoid further bike-shedding discussions while I very
slowly decide on the right terminology with my students.

I could be smarter in my error messages and use 'recipe' when code uses
it and 'function' otherwise. But what about other words like ingredient?
It would all add complexity that I'm not yet sure is worthwhile. But I
do want separate experiences for veteran programmers reading about Mu on
github and for people learning programming using Mu.
Diffstat (limited to '042name.cc')
-rw-r--r--042name.cc22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/042name.cc b/042name.cc
index f7eba9e0..1e386db4 100644
--- a/042name.cc
+++ b/042name.cc
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 //: convenience.
 
 :(scenario transform_names)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy 0
 ]
 +name: assign x 1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ recipe main [
 :(scenarios transform)
 :(scenario transform_names_fails_on_use_before_define)
 % Hide_errors = true;
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy y:number
 ]
 +error: main: use before set: y
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ bool is_special_name(const string& s) {
 
 :(scenario transform_names_passes_dummy)
 # _ is just a dummy result that never gets consumed
-recipe main [
+def main [
   _, x:number <- copy 0, 1
 ]
 +name: assign x 1
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ recipe main [
 :(scenarios run)
 :(scenario transform_names_passes_raw)
 % Hide_errors = true;
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number/raw <- copy 0
 ]
 -name: assign x 1
@@ -166,28 +166,28 @@ recipe main [
 :(scenarios transform)
 :(scenario transform_names_fails_when_mixing_names_and_numeric_locations)
 % Hide_errors = true;
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy 1:number
 ]
 +error: main: mixing variable names and numeric addresses
 
 :(scenario transform_names_fails_when_mixing_names_and_numeric_locations_2)
 % Hide_errors = true;
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy 1
   1:number <- copy x:number
 ]
 +error: main: mixing variable names and numeric addresses
 
 :(scenario transform_names_does_not_fail_when_mixing_names_and_raw_locations)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy 1:number/raw
 ]
 -error: main: mixing variable names and numeric addresses
 $error: 0
 
 :(scenario transform_names_does_not_fail_when_mixing_names_and_literals)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   x:number <- copy 1
 ]
 -error: main: mixing variable names and numeric addresses
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ $error: 0
 //:: Support element names for containers in 'get' and 'get-address'.
 
 :(scenario transform_names_transforms_container_elements)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   p:address:point <- copy 0
   a:number <- get *p:address:point, y:offset
   b:number <- get *p:address:point, x:offset
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ if (inst.name == "get" || inst.name == "get-address") {
 //: this test is actually illegal so can't call run
 :(scenarios transform)
 :(scenario transform_names_handles_containers)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   a:point <- copy 0/unsafe
   b:number <- copy 0/unsafe
 ]
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ recipe main [
 
 :(scenarios run)
 :(scenario transform_names_handles_exclusive_containers)
-recipe main [
+def main [
   12:number <- copy 1
   13:number <- copy 35
   14:number <- copy 36