2990

Standardize quotes around reagents in error messages.

I'm still sure there's issues. For example, the messages when
type-checking 'copy'. I'm not putting quotes around them because in
layer 60 I end up creating dilated reagents, and then it's a bit much to
have quotes and (two kinds of) brackets. But I'm sure I'm doing that
somewhere..

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/061scheduler.cc b/061scheduler.cc
index a3d0baad..edf05c26 100644
--- a/061scheduler.cc
+++ b/061scheduler.cc
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ case START_RUNNING: {
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_recipe(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'start-running' should be a recipe, but got " << to_string(inst.ingredients.at(0)) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'start-running' should be a recipe, but got '" << to_string(inst.ingredients.at(0)) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -342,11 +342,11 @@ put(Recipe_ordinal, "routine-state", ROUTINE_STATE);
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case ROUTINE_STATE: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 1) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'routine-state' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << to_original_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'routine-state' requires exactly one ingredient, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'routine-state' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'routine-state' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -375,11 +375,11 @@ put(Recipe_ordinal, "restart", RESTART);
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case RESTART: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 1) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'restart' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << to_original_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'restart' requires exactly one ingredient, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'restart' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'restart' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -403,11 +403,11 @@ put(Recipe_ordinal, "stop", STOP);
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case STOP: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 1) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'stop' requires exactly one ingredient, but got " << to_original_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'stop' requires exactly one ingredient, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'stop' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'stop' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;
@@ -507,15 +507,15 @@ put(Recipe_ordinal, "limit-time", LIMIT_TIME);
 :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
 case LIMIT_TIME: {
   if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 2) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'limit-time' requires exactly two ingredient, but got " << to_original_string(inst) << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'limit-time' requires exactly two ingredient, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'limit-time' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got " << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'limit-time' should be a routine id generated by 'start-running', but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(1))) {
-    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'limit-time' should be a number (of instructions to run for), but got " << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << '\n' << end();
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'limit-time' should be a number (of instructions to run for), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end();
     break;
   }
   break;