diff options
author | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2016-07-04 12:13:49 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2016-07-04 12:13:49 -0700 |
commit | b741c3e4befeae9b22ad6178f7f369a5c003334b (patch) | |
tree | 7a858c0cca57729550684d8b4c162fc6f2a39fbe | |
parent | 6b43e20861696e94731f6fd6c08189ac08a37d72 (diff) | |
download | mu-b741c3e4befeae9b22ad6178f7f369a5c003334b.tar.gz |
3099
-rw-r--r-- | Readme.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md index 91a26e20..2057ad96 100644 --- a/Readme.md +++ b/Readme.md @@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ continuations and lisp-like macros. High level languages today seem to provide three kinds of benefits: expressiveness (e.g. nested expressions, classes), safety (e.g. type checking) and automation (e.g. garbage collection). An idealized assembly language gives -up some expressiveness, but doesn't seem to affect the other benefits. +up some expressiveness, but doesn't seem to affect the other benefits. So far +Mu provides strong memory safety, lexical scope, generics, higher-order +functions and safe concurrency. *Taking Mu for a spin* |