about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-07-04 12:13:49 -0700
committerKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-07-04 12:13:49 -0700
commitb741c3e4befeae9b22ad6178f7f369a5c003334b (patch)
tree7a858c0cca57729550684d8b4c162fc6f2a39fbe
parent6b43e20861696e94731f6fd6c08189ac08a37d72 (diff)
downloadmu-b741c3e4befeae9b22ad6178f7f369a5c003334b.tar.gz
3099
-rw-r--r--Readme.md4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md
index 91a26e20..2057ad96 100644
--- a/Readme.md
+++ b/Readme.md
@@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ continuations and lisp-like macros.
 High level languages today seem to provide three kinds of benefits:
 expressiveness (e.g. nested expressions, classes), safety (e.g. type checking)
 and automation (e.g. garbage collection). An idealized assembly language gives
-up some expressiveness, but doesn't seem to affect the other benefits.
+up some expressiveness, but doesn't seem to affect the other benefits. So far
+Mu provides strong memory safety, lexical scope, generics, higher-order
+functions and safe concurrency.
 
 *Taking Mu for a spin*