diff options
author | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2016-03-10 14:52:16 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2016-03-10 14:52:16 -0800 |
commit | f07a814813ea6c5d4287a8b84ccab98728e9eaee (patch) | |
tree | 9954e939d75d2692e67faa5d1d5762f4ab6af674 | |
parent | eb0abedd1728dd61cd18555f2e6dbc66cb0a847d (diff) | |
download | mu-f07a814813ea6c5d4287a8b84ccab98728e9eaee.tar.gz |
2754
-rw-r--r-- | Readme.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/Readme.md b/Readme.md index a0147b95..0449a12d 100644 --- a/Readme.md +++ b/Readme.md @@ -64,8 +64,8 @@ continuations and lisp-like macros. High level languages today seem to provide three kinds of benefits: expressiveness (e.g. nested expressions, classes), safety (e.g. type checking) -and automation (e.g. garbage collection). An idealized assembly gives up some -expressiveness benefits, but doesn't seem to affect the other categories. +and automation (e.g. garbage collection). An idealized assembly language gives +up some expressiveness, but doesn't seem to affect the other benefits. *Taking Mu for a spin* |