diff options
author | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2015-04-21 17:19:52 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com> | 2015-04-21 17:19:52 -0700 |
commit | f7a2671901bc396ecd5578ba624c4532d6bbf4f3 (patch) | |
tree | d64e0eacb0aeef937297a05407ecd2366c82f910 /cpp/045closure_name.cc | |
parent | 963711e4cbc1c87314f66310da2d6f89aa471907 (diff) | |
download | mu-f7a2671901bc396ecd5578ba624c4532d6bbf4f3.tar.gz |
1119 - preparing to start porting chessboard
Arc version is 15% faster (8.3s vs 9.9s for print-board test) if I use an intermediate array rather than list. I'm starting to question the whole tagged-value design, and the current tagged-value implementation was treating squares as integers in one place anyway, so its benefits for typing are not great. Might as well create a good baseline for the Arc vs C++ performance test.
Diffstat (limited to 'cpp/045closure_name.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions