. - mu - Soul of a tiny new machine. More thorough tests → More comprehensible and rewrite-friendly software → More resilient society.

diff options

author	Kartik Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>	2021-04-21 08:28:00 -0700
committer	Kartik Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>	2021-04-21 08:28:00 -0700
commit	a8fb537a88fdbe77cdcbaa05ee28d1cad94550da (patch)
tree	d0fad5f8da140435dcf05b631a4b3f315e0c1f86 /html/linux/bootstrap/016index_addressing.cc.html
parent	d27994a9d73f970a7b54ec71f4ae457da3734daa (diff)
download	mu-a8fb537a88fdbe77cdcbaa05ee28d1cad94550da.tar.gz

Diffstat (limited to 'html/linux/bootstrap/016index_addressing.cc.html')

-rw-r--r--

html/linux/bootstrap/016index_addressing.cc.html

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

//: Mu scenarios. This will get long, but these are the tests we want to //: support in this layer. //: We avoid raw numeric locations in Mu -- except in scenarios, where they're //: handy to check the values of specific variables void test_scenario_block() { run_mu_scenario( "scenario foo [\n" " run [\n" " 1:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 13\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); // checks are inside scenario } void test_scenario_multiple_blocks() { run_mu_scenario( "scenario foo [\n" " run [\n" " 1:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 13\n" " ]\n" " run [\n" " 2:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 13\n" " 2 <- 13\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); // checks are inside scenario } void test_scenario_check_memory_and_trace() { run_mu_scenario( "scenario foo [\n" " run [\n" " 1:num <- copy 13\n" " trace 1, [a], [a b c]\n" " ]\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 13\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-contain [\n" " a: a b c\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-not-contain [\n" " a: x y z\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); // checks are inside scenario } //:: Core data structure :(before "End Types") struct scenario { string name; string to_run; void clear() { name.clear(); to_run.clear(); } }; :(before "End Globals") vector<scenario> Scenarios, Scenarios_snapshot; set<string> Scenario_names, Scenario_names_snapshot; :(before "End save_snapshots") Scenarios_snapshot = Scenarios; Scenario_names_snapshot = Scenario_names; :(before "End restore_snapshots") Scenarios = Scenarios_snapshot; Scenario_names = Scenario_names_snapshot; //:: Parse the 'scenario' form. //: Simply store the text of the scenario. :(before "End Command Handlers") else if (command == "scenario") { scenario result = parse_scenario(in); if (!result.name.empty()) Scenarios.push_back(result); } else if (command == "pending-scenario") { // for temporary use only parse_scenario(in); // discard } :(code) scenario parse_scenario(istream& in) { scenario result; result.name = next_word(in); if (contains_key(Scenario_names, result.name)) raise << "duplicate scenario name: '" << result.name << "'\n" << end(); Scenario_names.insert(result.name); if (result.name.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << "incomplete scenario at end of file\n" << end(); return result; } skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); if (in.peek() != '[') { raise << "Expected '[' after scenario '" << result.name << "'\n" << end(); exit(0); } // scenarios are take special 'code' strings so we need to ignore brackets // inside comments result.to_run = slurp_quoted(in); // delete [] delimiters if (!starts_with(result.to_run, "[")) { raise << "scenario " << result.name << " should start with '['\n" << end(); result.clear(); return result; } result.to_run.erase(0, 1); if (result.to_run.at(SIZE(result.to_run)-1) != ']') { raise << "scenario " << result.name << " has an unbalanced '['\n" << end(); result.clear(); return result; } result.to_run.erase(SIZE(result.to_run)-1); return result; } void test_read_scenario_with_bracket_in_comment() { run_mu_scenario( "scenario foo [\n" " # ']' in comment\n" " 1:num <- copy 0\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "run: {1: \"number\"} <- copy {0: \"literal\"}\n" ); } void test_read_scenario_with_bracket_in_comment_in_nested_string() { run_mu_scenario( "scenario foo [\n" " 1:text <- new [# not a comment]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "run: {1: (\"address\" \"array\" \"character\")} <- new {\"# not a comment\": \"literal-string\"}\n" ); } void test_duplicate_scenarios() { Hide_errors = true; run( "scenario foo [\n" " 1:num <- copy 0\n" "]\n" "scenario foo [\n" " 2:num <- copy 0\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: duplicate scenario name: 'foo'\n" ); } //:: Run scenarios when we run './mu test'. //: Treat the text of the scenario as a regular series of instructions. :(before "End Globals") int Num_core_mu_scenarios = 0; :(after "Check For .mu Files") Num_core_mu_scenarios = SIZE(Scenarios); :(before "End Tests") Hide_missing_default_space_errors = false; if (Num_core_mu_scenarios > 0) { time(&t); cerr << "Mu tests: " << ctime(&t); for (int i = 0; i < Num_core_mu_scenarios; ++i) { //? cerr << '\n' << i << ": " << Scenarios.at(i).name; run_mu_scenario(Scenarios.at(i)); if (Passed) cerr << "."; else ++num_failures; } cerr << "\n"; } run_app_scenarios: if (Num_core_mu_scenarios != SIZE(Scenarios)) { time(&t); cerr << "App tests: " << ctime(&t); for (int i = Num_core_mu_scenarios; i < SIZE(Scenarios); ++i) { //? cerr << '\n' << i << ": " << Scenarios.at(i).name; run_mu_scenario(Scenarios.at(i)); if (Passed) cerr << "."; else ++num_failures; } cerr << "\n"; } //: For faster debugging, support running tests for just the Mu app(s) we are //: loading. :(before "End Globals") bool Test_only_app = false; :(before "End Commandline Options(*arg)") else if (is_equal(*arg, "--test-only-app")) { Test_only_app = true; } :(after "End Test Run Initialization") if (Test_only_app && Num_core_mu_scenarios < SIZE(Scenarios)) { goto run_app_scenarios; } //: Convenience: run a single named scenario. :(after "Test Runs") for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(Scenarios); ++i) { if (Scenarios.at(i).name == argv[argc-1]) { run_mu_scenario(Scenarios.at(i)); if (Passed) cerr << ".\n"; return 0; } } :(before "End Globals") // this isn't a constant, just a global of type const* const scenario* Current_scenario = NULL; :(code) void run_mu_scenario(const scenario& s) { Current_scenario = &s; bool not_already_inside_test = !Trace_stream; //? cerr << s.name << '\n'; if (not_already_inside_test) { Trace_stream = new trace_stream; reset(); } vector<recipe_ordinal> tmp = load("recipe scenario_"+s.name+" [ "+s.to_run+" ]"); mark_autogenerated(tmp.at(0)); bind_special_scenario_names(tmp.at(0)); transform_all(); if (!trace_contains_errors()) run(tmp.front()); // End Mu Test Teardown if (!Hide_errors && trace_contains_errors() && !Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; if (not_already_inside_test && Trace_stream) { delete Trace_stream; Trace_stream = NULL; } Current_scenario = NULL; } //: Permit numeric locations to be accessed in scenarios. :(before "End check_default_space Special-cases") // user code should never create recipes with underscores in their names if (starts_with(caller.name, "scenario_")) return; // skip Mu scenarios which will use raw memory locations if (starts_with(caller.name, "run_")) return; // skip calls to 'run', which should be in scenarios and will also use raw memory locations :(before "End maybe(recipe_name) Special-cases") if (starts_with(recipe_name, "scenario_")) return recipe_name.substr(strlen("scenario_")) + ": "; //: Some variables for fake resources always get special /raw addresses in scenarios. :(code) // Should contain everything passed by is_special_name but failed by is_disqualified. void bind_special_scenario_names(const recipe_ordinal r) { // Special Scenario Variable Names(r) // End Special Scenario Variable Names(r) } :(before "Done Placing Ingredient(ingredient, inst, caller)") maybe_make_raw(ingredient, caller); :(before "Done Placing Product(product, inst, caller)") maybe_make_raw(product, caller); :(code) void maybe_make_raw(reagent& r, const recipe& caller) { if (!is_special_name(r.name)) return; if (starts_with(caller.name, "scenario_")) r.properties.push_back(pair<string, string_tree*>("raw", NULL)); // End maybe_make_raw } //: Test with some setup. :(before "End is_special_name Special-cases") if (s == "__maybe_make_raw_test__") return true; :(before "End Special Scenario Variable Names(r)") //: ugly: we only need this for this one test, but need to define it for all time Name[r]["__maybe_make_raw_test__"] = Reserved_for_tests-1; :(code) void test_maybe_make_raw() { // check that scenarios can use local-scope and special variables together vector<recipe_ordinal> tmp = load( "def scenario_foo [\n" " local-scope\n" " __maybe_make_raw_test__:num <- copy 34\n" "]\n"); mark_autogenerated(tmp.at(0)); bind_special_scenario_names(tmp.at(0)); transform_all(); run(tmp.at(0)); CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN_ERRORS(); } //: Watch out for redefinitions of scenario routines. We should never ever be //: doing that, regardless of anything else. void test_forbid_redefining_scenario_even_if_forced() { Hide_errors = true; Disable_redefine_checks = true; run( "def scenario-foo [\n" " 1:num <- copy 34\n" "]\n" "def scenario-foo [\n" " 1:num <- copy 35\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: redefining recipe scenario-foo\n" ); } void test_scenario_containing_parse_error() { Hide_errors = true; run( "scenario foo [\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 0\n" // missing ']' "]\n" ); // no crash } void test_scenario_containing_transform_error() { Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " local-scope\n" " add x, 1\n" "]\n" ); // no crash } :(after "bool should_check_for_redefine(const string& recipe_name)") if (recipe_name.find("scenario-") == 0) return true; //:: The special instructions we want to support inside scenarios. //: These are easy to support in an interpreter, but will require more work //: when we eventually build a compiler. //: 'run' is a purely lexical convenience to separate the code actually being //: tested from any setup :(code) void test_run() { run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " 1:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "mem: storing 13 in location 1\n" ); } :(before "End Rewrite Instruction(curr, recipe result)") if (curr.name == "run") { // Just inline all instructions inside the run block in the containing // recipe. 'run' is basically a comment; pretend it doesn't exist. istringstream in2("[\n"+curr.ingredients.at(0).name+"\n]\n"); slurp_body(in2, result); curr.clear(); } :(code) void test_run_multiple() { run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " 1:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" " run [\n" " 2:num <- copy 13\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "mem: storing 13 in location 1\n" "mem: storing 13 in location 2\n" ); } //: 'memory-should-contain' raises errors if specific locations aren't as expected //: Also includes some special support for checking Mu texts. :(before "End Globals") bool Scenario_testing_scenario = false; :(before "End Reset") Scenario_testing_scenario = false; :(code) void test_memory_check() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 13\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "run: checking location 1\n" "error: F - main: expected location '1' to contain 13 but saw 0\n" ); } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "memory-should-contain", MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case MEMORY_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_memory(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) void check_memory(const string& s) { istringstream in(s); in >> std::noskipws; set<int> locations_checked; while (true) { skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); if (!has_data(in)) break; string lhs = next_word(in); if (lhs.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "incomplete 'memory-should-contain' block at end of file (0)\n" << end(); return; } if (!is_integer(lhs)) { check_type(lhs, in); continue; } int address = to_integer(lhs); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _assign; in >> _assign; assert(_assign == "<-"); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string rhs = next_word(in); if (rhs.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "incomplete 'memory-should-contain' block at end of file (1)\n" << end(); return; } if (!is_integer(rhs) && !is_noninteger(rhs)) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "location '" << address << "' can't contain non-number " << rhs << '\n' << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; return; } double value = to_double(rhs); if (contains_key(locations_checked, address)) raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "duplicate expectation for location '" << address << "'\n" << end(); trace(Callstack_depth+1, "run") << "checking location " << address << end(); if (get_or_insert(Memory, address) != value) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected location '" << address << "' to contain " << no_scientific(value) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, address)) << '\n' << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; return; } locations_checked.insert(address); } } void check_type(const string& lhs, istream& in) { reagent x(lhs); if (is_mu_array(x.type) && is_mu_character(array_element(x.type))) { x.set_value(to_integer(x.name)); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _assign = next_word(in); if (_assign.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "incomplete 'memory-should-contain' block at end of file (2)\n" << end(); return; } assert(_assign == "<-"); skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string literal = next_word(in); if (literal.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "incomplete 'memory-should-contain' block at end of file (3)\n" << end(); return; } int address = x.value; // exclude quoting brackets if (*literal.begin() != '[') { raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "array:character types inside 'memory-should-contain' can only be compared with text literals surrounded by [], not '" << literal << "'\n" << end(); return; } literal.erase(literal.begin()); assert(*--literal.end() == ']'); literal.erase(--literal.end()); check_mu_text(address, literal); return; } // End Scenario Type Special-cases raise << "don't know how to check memory for '" << lhs << "'\n" << end(); } void check_mu_text(int start, const string& literal) { trace(Callstack_depth+1, "run") << "checking text length at " << start << end(); int array_length = static_cast<int>(get_or_insert(Memory, start)); if (array_length != SIZE(literal)) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected location '" << start << "' to contain length " << SIZE(literal) << " of text [" << literal << "] but saw " << array_length << " (for text [" << read_mu_characters(start+/*skip length*/1, array_length) << "])\n" << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; return; } int curr = start+1; // now skip length for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(literal); ++i) { trace(Callstack_depth+1, "run") << "checking location " << curr+i << end(); if (get_or_insert(Memory, curr+i) != literal.at(i)) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected location " << (curr+i) << " to contain " << literal.at(i) << " but saw " << no_scientific(get_or_insert(Memory, curr+i)) << '\n' << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; return; } } } void test_memory_check_multiple() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 0\n" " 1 <- 0\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: main: duplicate expectation for location '1'\n" ); } void test_memory_check_mu_text_length() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " 1:num <- copy 3\n" " 2:num <- copy 97 # 'a'\n" " 3:num <- copy 98 # 'b'\n" " 4:num <- copy 99 # 'c'\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1:array:character <- [ab]\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: expected location '1' to contain length 2 of text [ab] but saw 3 (for text [abc])\n" ); } void test_memory_check_mu_text() { run( "def main [\n" " 1:num <- copy 3\n" " 2:num <- copy 97\n" // 'a' " 3:num <- copy 98\n" // 'b' " 4:num <- copy 99\n" // 'c' " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1:array:character <- [abc]\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "run: checking text length at 1\n" "run: checking location 2\n" "run: checking location 3\n" "run: checking location 4\n" ); } void test_memory_invalid_string_check() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- [abc]\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: location '1' can't contain non-number [abc]\n" ); } void test_memory_invalid_string_check2() { Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " 1:num <- copy 3\n" " 2:num <- copy 97\n" // 'a' " 3:num <- copy 98\n" // 'b' " 4:num <- copy 99\n" // 'c' " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1:array:character <- 0\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: main: array:character types inside 'memory-should-contain' can only be compared with text literals surrounded by [], not '0'\n" ); } void test_memory_check_with_comment() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " memory-should-contain [\n" " 1 <- 34 # comment\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN("error: location 1 can't contain non-number 34 # comment"); // but there'll be an error signalled by memory-should-contain } //: 'trace-should-contain' is like the '+' lines in our scenarios so far //: Like runs of contiguous '+' lines, order is important. The trace checks //: that the lines are present *and* in the specified sequence. (There can be //: other lines in between.) void test_trace_check_fails() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" // nothing added to the trace " trace-should-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " a: d\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: missing [b] in trace with label 'a'\n" ); } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "trace-should-contain", TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case TRACE_SHOULD_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_trace(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) // simplified version of check_trace_contents() that emits errors rather // than just printing to stderr void check_trace(const string& expected) { Trace_stream->newline(); vector<trace_line> expected_lines = parse_trace(expected); if (expected_lines.empty()) return; int curr_expected_line = 0; for (vector<trace_line>::iterator p = Trace_stream->past_lines.begin(); p != Trace_stream->past_lines.end(); ++p) { if (expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).label != p->label) continue; if (expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).contents != trim(p->contents)) continue; // match ++curr_expected_line; if (curr_expected_line == SIZE(expected_lines)) return; } if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "missing [" << expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).contents << "] " << "in trace with label '" << expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).label << "'\n" << end(); if (!Hide_errors) DUMP(expected_lines.at(curr_expected_line).label); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; } vector<trace_line> parse_trace(const string& expected) { vector<string> buf = split(expected, "\n"); vector<trace_line> result; const string separator = ": "; for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(buf); ++i) { buf.at(i) = trim(buf.at(i)); if (buf.at(i).empty()) continue; int delim = buf.at(i).find(separator); if (delim == -1) { raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "lines in 'trace-should-contain' should be of the form <label>: <contents>. Both parts are required.\n" << end(); result.clear(); return result; } result.push_back(trace_line(/*contents*/ trim(buf.at(i).substr(delim+SIZE(separator) )), /*label*/ trim(buf.at(i).substr(0, delim)))); } return result; } void test_trace_check_fails_in_nonfirst_line() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [b]\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " a: d\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: missing [d] in trace with label 'a'\n" ); } void test_trace_check_passes_silently() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [b]\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN("error: missing [b] in trace with label 'a'"); CHECK_TRACE_COUNT("error", 0); } //: 'trace-should-not-contain' checks each line in its argument for absence. //: Order is *not* important, so you can't say things like "B should not exist //: after A." void test_trace_negative_check_fails() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [b]\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-not-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: unexpected [b] in trace with label 'a'\n" ); } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "trace-should-not-contain", TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN: { break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case TRACE_SHOULD_NOT_CONTAIN: { if (!Passed) break; check_trace_missing(current_instruction().ingredients.at(0).name); break; } :(code) // simplified version of check_trace_contents() that emits errors rather // than just printing to stderr bool check_trace_missing(const string& in) { Trace_stream->newline(); vector<trace_line> lines = parse_trace(in); for (int i = 0; i < SIZE(lines); ++i) { if (trace_count(lines.at(i).label, lines.at(i).contents) != 0) { raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "unexpected [" << lines.at(i).contents << "] in trace with label '" << lines.at(i).label << "'\n" << end(); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; return false; } } return true; } void test_trace_negative_check_passes_silently() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; run( "def main [\n" " trace-should-not-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_DOESNT_CONTAIN("error: unexpected [b] in trace with label 'a'"); CHECK_TRACE_COUNT("error", 0); } void test_trace_negative_check_fails_on_any_unexpected_line() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [d]\n" " ]\n" " trace-should-not-contain [\n" " a: b\n" " a: d\n" " ]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: unexpected [d] in trace with label 'a'\n" ); } void test_trace_count_check() { run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [foo]\n" " ]\n" " check-trace-count-for-label 1, [a]\n" "]\n" ); // checks are inside scenario } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "check-trace-count-for-label", CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL: { if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 2) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'check-trace-count-for-label' requires exactly two ingredients, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a number (count), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_literal_text(inst.ingredients.at(1))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a literal string (label), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL: { if (!Passed) break; int expected_count = ingredients.at(0).at(0); string label = current_instruction().ingredients.at(1).name; int count = trace_count(label); if (count != expected_count) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected " << expected_count << " lines in trace with label '" << label << "' in trace\n" << end(); if (!Hide_errors) DUMP(label); if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_GREATER_THAN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "check-trace-count-for-label-greater-than", CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_GREATER_THAN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_GREATER_THAN: { if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 2) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'check-trace-count-for-label' requires exactly two ingredients, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a number (count), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_literal_text(inst.ingredients.at(1))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a literal string (label), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_GREATER_THAN: { if (!Passed) break; int expected_count = ingredients.at(0).at(0); string label = current_instruction().ingredients.at(1).name; int count = trace_count(label); if (count <= expected_count) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected more than " << expected_count << " lines in trace with label '" << label << "' in trace\n" << end(); if (!Hide_errors) { cerr << "trace contents:\n"; DUMP(label); } if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_LESSER_THAN, :(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") put(Recipe_ordinal, "check-trace-count-for-label-lesser-than", CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_LESSER_THAN); :(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_LESSER_THAN: { if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) != 2) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'check-trace-count-for-label' requires exactly two ingredients, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(0))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "first ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a number (count), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } if (!is_literal_text(inst.ingredients.at(1))) { raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "second ingredient of 'check-trace-count-for-label' should be a literal string (label), but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(1).original_string << "'\n" << end(); break; } break; } :(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") case CHECK_TRACE_COUNT_FOR_LABEL_LESSER_THAN: { if (!Passed) break; int expected_count = ingredients.at(0).at(0); string label = current_instruction().ingredients.at(1).name; int count = trace_count(label); if (count >= expected_count) { if (!Hide_errors) cerr << '\n'; raise << "F - " << maybe(current_recipe_name()) << "expected less than " << expected_count << " lines in trace with label '" << label << "' in trace\n" << end(); if (!Hide_errors) { cerr << "trace contents:\n"; DUMP(label); } if (!Scenario_testing_scenario) Passed = false; } break; } :(code) void test_trace_count_check_2() { Scenario_testing_scenario = true; Hide_errors = true; run( "def main [\n" " run [\n" " trace 1, [a], [foo]\n" " ]\n" " check-trace-count-for-label 2, [a]\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: F - main: expected 2 lines in trace with label 'a' in trace\n" ); } //: Minor detail: ignore 'system' calls in scenarios, since anything we do //: with them is by definition impossible to test through Mu. :(after "case _SYSTEM:") if (Current_scenario) break; //:: Warn if people use '_' manually in recipe names. They're reserved for internal use. :(code) void test_recipe_name_with_underscore() { Hide_errors = true; run( "def foo_bar [\n" "]\n" ); CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS( "error: foo_bar: don't create recipes with '_' in the name\n" ); } :(before "End recipe Fields") bool is_autogenerated; :(before "End recipe Constructor") is_autogenerated = false; :(code) void mark_autogenerated(recipe_ordinal r) { get(Recipe, r).is_autogenerated = true; } :(after "void transform_all()") for (map<recipe_ordinal, recipe>::iterator p = Recipe.begin(); p != Recipe.end(); ++p) { const recipe& r = p->second; if (r.name.find('_') == string::npos) continue; if (r.is_autogenerated) continue; // created by previous call to transform_all() raise << r.name << ": don't create recipes with '_' in the name\n" << end(); } //:: Helpers :(code) // just for the scenarios running scenarios in C++ layers void run_mu_scenario(const string& form) { Scenario_names.clear(); istringstream in(form); in >> std::noskipws; skip_whitespace_and_comments(in); string _scenario = next_word(in); if (_scenario.empty()) { assert(!has_data(in)); raise << "no scenario in string passed into run_mu_scenario()\n" << end(); return; } assert(_scenario == "scenario"); scenario s = parse_scenario(in); run_mu_scenario(s); }


context:
space:
mode: