about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/lambda-to-mu.mu
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-11-10 10:24:14 -0800
committerKartik K. Agaram <vc@akkartik.com>2016-11-10 10:24:14 -0800
commitf116818c7c6e98a5d9bfa7058096b42df85d8e1c (patch)
treeba3458a0c51f67c27c7347b1c5f5be2fc33965e2 /lambda-to-mu.mu
parentb771d375d3e11dcf3e6e55175f2ae128448177a7 (diff)
downloadmu-f116818c7c6e98a5d9bfa7058096b42df85d8e1c.tar.gz
3656
Periodic cleanup to replace 'reply' with 'return' everywhere in the
repo.

I use 'reply' for students to help reinforce the metaphor of function
calls as being like messages through a pipe. But that causes 'reply' to
get into my muscle memory when writing Mu code for myself, and I worry
that that makes Mu seem unnecessarily alien to anybody reading on
Github.

Perhaps I should just give it up? I'll try using 'return' with my next
student.
Diffstat (limited to 'lambda-to-mu.mu')
-rw-r--r--lambda-to-mu.mu22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/lambda-to-mu.mu b/lambda-to-mu.mu
index c1c3171f..ef9886e3 100644
--- a/lambda-to-mu.mu
+++ b/lambda-to-mu.mu
@@ -50,14 +50,14 @@ def new-pair a:&:cell, b:&:cell -> result:&:cell [
 def is-atom? x:&:cell -> result:bool [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
-  reply-unless x, 0/false
+  return-unless x, 0/false
   _, result <- maybe-convert *x, atom:variant
 ]
 
 def is-pair? x:&:cell -> result:bool [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
-  reply-unless x, 0/false
+  return-unless x, 0/false
   _, result <- maybe-convert *x, pair:variant
 ]
 
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ def atom-match? x:&:cell, pat:text -> result:bool [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
   s:text, is-atom?:bool <- maybe-convert *x, atom:variant
-  reply-unless is-atom?, 0/false
+  return-unless is-atom?, 0/false
   result <- equal pat, s
 ]
 
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ def first x:&:cell -> result:&:cell [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
   pair:pair, pair?:bool <- maybe-convert *x, pair:variant
-  reply-unless pair?, 0/nil
+  return-unless pair?, 0/nil
   result <- get pair, first:offset
 ]
 
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ def rest x:&:cell -> result:&:cell [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
   pair:pair, pair?:bool <- maybe-convert *x, pair:variant
-  reply-unless pair?, 0/nil
+  return-unless pair?, 0/nil
   result <- get pair, rest:offset
 ]
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ def set-first base:&:cell, new-first:&:cell -> base:&:cell [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
   pair:pair, is-pair?:bool <- maybe-convert *base, pair:variant
-  reply-unless is-pair?
+  return-unless is-pair?
   pair <- put pair, first:offset, new-first
   *base <- merge 1/pair, pair
 ]
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def set-rest base:&:cell, new-rest:&:cell -> base:&:cell [
   local-scope
   load-ingredients
   pair:pair, is-pair?:bool <- maybe-convert *base, pair:variant
-  reply-unless is-pair?
+  return-unless is-pair?
   pair <- put pair, rest:offset, new-rest
   *base <- merge 1/pair, pair
 ]
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ def parse in:&:stream:char -> out:&:cell, in:&:stream:char [
   # skip whitespace
   in <- skip-whitespace in
   c:char, eof?:bool <- peek in
-  reply-if eof?, 0/nil
+  return-if eof?, 0/nil
   pair?:bool <- equal c, 40/open-paren
   {
     break-if pair?
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ def skip-whitespace in:&:stream:char -> in:&:stream:char [
   load-ingredients
   {
     done?:bool <- end-of-stream? in
-    reply-if done?, 0/null
+    return-if done?, 0/null
     c:char <- peek in
     space?:bool <- space? c
     break-unless space?
@@ -294,14 +294,14 @@ def to-buffer x:&:cell, buf:&:buffer -> buf:&:buffer [
   {
     break-if x
     buf <- append buf, [<>]
-    reply
+    return
   }
   # base case: atom
   {
     s:text, atom?:bool <- maybe-convert *x, atom:variant
     break-unless atom?
     buf <- append buf, s
-    reply
+    return
   }
   # recursive case: pair
   buf <- append buf, [< ]