diff options
Diffstat (limited to '036call_reply.cc')
-rw-r--r-- | 036call_reply.cc | 158 |
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/036call_reply.cc b/036call_reply.cc new file mode 100644 index 00000000..8c69fa3f --- /dev/null +++ b/036call_reply.cc @@ -0,0 +1,158 @@ +//: Calls can also generate products, using 'reply'. + +:(scenario reply) +recipe main [ + 1:number, 2:number <- f 34:literal +] +recipe f [ + 12:number <- next-ingredient + 13:number <- add 1:literal, 12:number + reply 12:number, 13:number +] ++mem: storing 34 in location 1 ++mem: storing 35 in location 2 + +:(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations") +REPLY, +:(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers") +Recipe_number["reply"] = REPLY; +:(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations") +case REPLY: { + const instruction& reply_inst = current_instruction(); // save pointer into recipe before pop + const string& callee = current_recipe_name(); + --Callstack_depth; +//? if (tb_is_active()) { //? 1 +//? tb_clear(); //? 1 +//? cerr << Recipe[Current_routine->calls.front().running_recipe].name << ' ' << current_step_index() << '\n'; //? 1 +//? } //? 1 + Current_routine->calls.pop_front(); + // just in case 'main' returns a value, drop it for now + if (Current_routine->calls.empty()) goto stop_running_current_routine; + const instruction& caller_instruction = current_instruction(); + // make reply results available to caller + copy(ingredients.begin(), ingredients.end(), inserter(products, products.begin())); + // check that any reply ingredients with /same-as-ingredient connect up + // the corresponding ingredient and product in the caller. + for (long long int i = 0; i < SIZE(caller_instruction.products); ++i) { +//? cerr << Recipe[Current_routine->calls.front().running_recipe].name << '\n'; //? 1 + trace(Primitive_recipe_depth, "run") << "result " << i << " is " << to_string(ingredients.at(i)); + if (has_property(reply_inst.ingredients.at(i), "same-as-ingredient")) { + vector<string> tmp = property(reply_inst.ingredients.at(i), "same-as-ingredient"); + assert(SIZE(tmp) == 1); + long long int ingredient_index = to_integer(tmp.at(0)); + if (caller_instruction.products.at(i).value != caller_instruction.ingredients.at(ingredient_index).value) + raise << current_recipe_name() << ": 'same-as-ingredient' result " << caller_instruction.products.at(i).value << " from call to " << callee << " must be location " << caller_instruction.ingredients.at(ingredient_index).value << '\n'; + } + } + break; // continue to process rest of *caller* instruction +} + +//: Products can include containers and exclusive containers, addresses and arrays. +:(scenario reply_container) +recipe main [ + 3:point <- f 2:literal +] +recipe f [ + 12:number <- next-ingredient + 13:number <- copy 35:literal + reply 12:point/raw # unsafe +] ++run: result 0 is [2, 35] ++mem: storing 2 in location 3 ++mem: storing 35 in location 4 + +//: In mu we'd like to assume that any instruction doesn't modify its +//: ingredients unless they're also products. The /same-as-ingredient inside +//: the recipe's 'reply' will help catch accidental misuse of such +//: 'ingredient-results' (sometimes called in-out parameters in other languages). + +:(scenario reply_same_as_ingredient) +% Hide_warnings = true; +recipe main [ + 1:number <- copy 0:literal + 2:number <- test1 1:number # call with different ingredient and product +] +recipe test1 [ + 10:address:number <- next-ingredient + reply 10:address:number/same-as-ingredient:0 +] ++warn: main: 'same-as-ingredient' result 2 from call to test1 must be location 1 + +:(code) +string to_string(const vector<double>& in) { + if (in.empty()) return "[]"; + ostringstream out; + if (SIZE(in) == 1) { + out << in.at(0); + return out.str(); + } + out << "["; + for (long long int i = 0; i < SIZE(in); ++i) { + if (i > 0) out << ", "; + out << in.at(i); + } + out << "]"; + return out.str(); +} + +//: Conditional reply. + +:(scenario reply_if) +recipe main [ + 1:number <- test1 +] +recipe test1 [ + reply-if 0:literal, 34:literal + reply 35:literal +] ++mem: storing 35 in location 1 + +:(scenario reply_if2) +recipe main [ + 1:number <- test1 +] +recipe test1 [ + reply-if 1:literal, 34:literal + reply 35:literal +] ++mem: storing 34 in location 1 + +:(before "End Rewrite Instruction(curr)") +// rewrite `reply-if a, b, c, ...` to +// ``` +// jump-unless a, 1:offset +// reply b, c, ... +// ``` +if (curr.name == "reply-if") { + assert(curr.products.empty()); + curr.operation = Recipe_number["jump-unless"]; + curr.name = "jump-unless"; + vector<reagent> results; + copy(++curr.ingredients.begin(), curr.ingredients.end(), inserter(results, results.end())); + curr.ingredients.resize(1); + curr.ingredients.push_back(reagent("1:offset")); + result.steps.push_back(curr); + curr.clear(); + curr.operation = Recipe_number["reply"]; + curr.name = "reply"; + curr.ingredients.swap(results); +} +// rewrite `reply-unless a, b, c, ...` to +// ``` +// jump-if a, 1:offset +// reply b, c, ... +// ``` +if (curr.name == "reply-unless") { + assert(curr.products.empty()); + curr.operation = Recipe_number["jump-if"]; + curr.name = "jump-if"; + vector<reagent> results; + copy(++curr.ingredients.begin(), curr.ingredients.end(), inserter(results, results.end())); + curr.ingredients.resize(1); + curr.ingredients.push_back(reagent("1:offset")); + result.steps.push_back(curr); + curr.clear(); + curr.operation = Recipe_number["reply"]; + curr.name = "reply"; + curr.ingredients.swap(results); +} |