about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/archive/1.vm/034address.cc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'archive/1.vm/034address.cc')
-rw-r--r--archive/1.vm/034address.cc514
1 files changed, 514 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/archive/1.vm/034address.cc b/archive/1.vm/034address.cc
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..bafde7b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/archive/1.vm/034address.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,514 @@
+//: Addresses help us spend less time copying data around.
+
+//: So far we've been operating on primitives like numbers and characters, and
+//: we've started combining these primitives together into larger logical
+//: units (containers or arrays) that may contain many different primitives at
+//: once. Containers and arrays can grow quite large in complex programs, and
+//: we'd like some way to efficiently share them between recipes without
+//: constantly having to make copies. Right now 'next-ingredient' and 'return'
+//: copy data across recipe boundaries. To avoid copying large quantities of
+//: data around, we'll use *addresses*. An address is a bookmark to some
+//: arbitrary quantity of data (the *payload*). It's a primitive, so it's as
+//: efficient to copy as a number. To read or modify the payload 'pointed to'
+//: by an address, we'll perform a *lookup*.
+//:
+//: The notion of 'lookup' isn't an instruction like 'add' or 'subtract'.
+//: Instead it's an operation that can be performed when reading any of the
+//: ingredients of an instruction, and when writing to any of the products. To
+//: write to the payload of an ingredient rather than its value, simply add
+//: the /lookup property to it. Modern computers provide efficient support for
+//: addresses and lookups, making this a realistic feature.
+//:
+//: To create addresses and allocate memory exclusively for their use, use
+//: 'new'. Memory is a finite resource so if the computer can't satisfy your
+//: request, 'new' may return a 0 (null) address.
+//:
+//: Computers these days have lots of memory so in practice we can often
+//: assume we'll never run out. If you start running out however, say in a
+//: long-running program, you'll need to switch mental gears and start
+//: husbanding our memory more carefully. The most important tool to avoid
+//: wasting memory is to 'abandon' an address when you don't need it anymore.
+//: That frees up the memory allocated to it to be reused in future calls to
+//: 'new'.
+
+//: Since memory can be reused multiple times, it can happen that you have a
+//: stale copy to an address that has since been abandoned and reused. Using
+//: the stale address is almost never safe, but it can be very hard to track
+//: down such copies because any errors caused by them may occur even millions
+//: of instructions after the copy or abandon instruction. To help track down
+//: such issues, Mu tracks an 'alloc id' for each allocation it makes. The
+//: first call to 'new' has an alloc id of 1, the second gets 2, and so on.
+//: The alloc id is never reused.
+:(before "End Globals")
+long long Next_alloc_id = 0;
+:(before "End Reset")
+Next_alloc_id = 0;
+
+//: The 'new' instruction records alloc ids both in the memory being allocated
+//: and *also* in the address. The 'abandon' instruction clears alloc ids in
+//: both places as well. Tracking alloc ids in this manner allows us to raise
+//: errors about stale addresses much earlier: 'lookup' operations always
+//: compare alloc ids between the address and its payload.
+
+//: todo: give 'new' a custodian ingredient. Following malloc/free is a temporary hack.
+
+:(code)
+void test_new() {
+  run(
+      // call 'new' two times with identical types without modifying the
+      // results; you should get back different results
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  12:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  20:bool <- equal 10:&:num, 12:&:num\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "mem: storing 1000 in location 11\n"
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 20\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_array() {
+  run(
+      // call 'new' with a second ingredient to allocate an array of some type
+      // rather than a single copy
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:@:num <- new num:type, 5\n"
+      "  12:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  20:num/alloc2, 21:num/alloc1 <- deaddress 10:&:@:num, 12:&:num\n"
+      "  30:num <- subtract 21:num/alloc2, 20:num/alloc1\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "run: {10: (\"address\" \"array\" \"number\")} <- new {num: \"type\"}, {5: \"literal\"}\n"
+      "mem: array length is 5\n"
+      // skip alloc id in allocation
+      "mem: storing 1000 in location 11\n"
+      // don't forget the extra locations for alloc id and array length
+      "mem: storing 7 in location 30\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_dilated_reagent_with_new() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:&:num <- new {(& num): type}\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "new: size of '(& num)' is 2\n"
+  );
+}
+
+//: 'new' takes a weird 'type' as its first ingredient; don't error on it
+:(before "End Mu Types Initialization")
+put(Type_ordinal, "type", 0);
+:(code)
+bool is_mu_type_literal(const reagent& r) {
+  return is_literal(r) && r.type && r.type->name == "type";
+}
+
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations")
+NEW,
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers")
+put(Recipe_ordinal, "new", NEW);
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
+case NEW: {
+  const recipe& caller = get(Recipe, r);
+  if (inst.ingredients.empty() || SIZE(inst.ingredients) > 2) {
+    raise << maybe(caller.name) << "'new' requires one or two ingredients, but got '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  // End NEW Check Special-cases
+  const reagent& type = inst.ingredients.at(0);
+  if (!is_mu_type_literal(type)) {
+    raise << maybe(caller.name) << "first ingredient of 'new' should be a type, but got '" << type.original_string << "'\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) > 1 && !is_mu_number(inst.ingredients.at(1))) {
+    raise << maybe(caller.name) << "second ingredient of 'new' should be a number (array length), but got '" << type.original_string << "'\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  if (inst.products.empty()) {
+    raise << maybe(caller.name) << "result of 'new' should never be ignored\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  if (!product_of_new_is_valid(inst)) {
+    raise << maybe(caller.name) << "product of 'new' has incorrect type: '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  break;
+}
+
+:(code)
+bool product_of_new_is_valid(const instruction& inst) {
+  reagent/*copy*/ product = inst.products.at(0);
+  // Update NEW product in Check
+  if (!product.type || product.type->atom || product.type->left->value != Address_type_ordinal)
+    return false;
+  drop_from_type(product, "address");
+  if (SIZE(inst.ingredients) > 1) {
+    // array allocation
+    if (!product.type || product.type->atom || product.type->left->value != Array_type_ordinal)
+      return false;
+    drop_from_type(product, "array");
+  }
+  reagent/*local*/ expected_product(new_type_tree(inst.ingredients.at(0).name));
+  return types_strictly_match(product, expected_product);
+}
+
+void drop_from_type(reagent& r, string expected_type) {
+  assert(!r.type->atom);
+  if (r.type->left->name != expected_type) {
+    raise << "can't drop2 " << expected_type << " from '" << to_string(r) << "'\n" << end();
+    return;
+  }
+  // r.type = r.type->right
+  type_tree* tmp = r.type;
+  r.type = tmp->right;
+  tmp->right = NULL;
+  delete tmp;
+  // if (!r.type->right) r.type = r.type->left
+  assert(!r.type->atom);
+  if (r.type->right) return;
+  tmp = r.type;
+  r.type = tmp->left;
+  tmp->left = NULL;
+  delete tmp;
+}
+
+void test_new_returns_incorrect_type() {
+  Hide_errors = true;
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:bool <- new num:type\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "error: main: product of 'new' has incorrect type: '1:bool <- new num:type'\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_discerns_singleton_list_from_atom_container() {
+  Hide_errors = true;
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new {(num): type}\n"  // should be '{num: type}'
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "error: main: product of 'new' has incorrect type: '1:&:num <- new {(num): type}'\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_with_type_abbreviation() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_COUNT("error", 0);
+}
+
+void test_new_with_type_abbreviation_inside_compound() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  {1: (address address number), raw: ()} <- new {(& num): type}\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_COUNT("error", 0);
+}
+
+void test_equal_result_of_new_with_null() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  10:bool <- equal 1:&:num, null\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 10\n"
+  );
+}
+
+//: To implement 'new', a Mu transform turns all 'new' instructions into
+//: 'allocate' instructions that precompute the amount of memory they want to
+//: allocate.
+
+//: Ensure that we never call 'allocate' directly, and that there's no 'new'
+//: instructions left after the transforms have run.
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
+case ALLOCATE: {
+  raise << "never call 'allocate' directly'; always use 'new'\n" << end();
+  break;
+}
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations")
+case NEW: {
+  raise << "no implementation for 'new'; why wasn't it translated to 'allocate'? Please save a copy of your program and send it to Kartik.\n" << end();
+  break;
+}
+
+:(after "Transform.push_back(check_instruction)")  // check_instruction will guard against direct 'allocate' instructions below
+Transform.push_back(transform_new_to_allocate);  // idempotent
+
+:(code)
+void transform_new_to_allocate(const recipe_ordinal r) {
+  trace(101, "transform") << "--- convert 'new' to 'allocate' for recipe " << get(Recipe, r).name << end();
+  for (int i = 0;  i < SIZE(get(Recipe, r).steps);  ++i) {
+    instruction& inst = get(Recipe, r).steps.at(i);
+    // Convert 'new' To 'allocate'
+    if (inst.name == "new") {
+      if (inst.ingredients.empty()) return;  // error raised elsewhere
+      inst.operation = ALLOCATE;
+      type_tree* type = new_type_tree(inst.ingredients.at(0).name);
+      inst.ingredients.at(0).set_value(size_of(type));
+      trace(102, "new") << "size of '" << inst.ingredients.at(0).name << "' is " << inst.ingredients.at(0).value << end();
+      delete type;
+    }
+  }
+}
+
+//: implement 'allocate' based on size
+
+:(before "End Globals")
+extern const int Reserved_for_tests = 1000;
+int Memory_allocated_until = Reserved_for_tests;
+int Initial_memory_per_routine = 100000;
+:(before "End Reset")
+Memory_allocated_until = Reserved_for_tests;
+Initial_memory_per_routine = 100000;
+:(before "End routine Fields")
+int alloc, alloc_max;
+:(before "End routine Constructor")
+alloc = Memory_allocated_until;
+Memory_allocated_until += Initial_memory_per_routine;
+alloc_max = Memory_allocated_until;
+trace(Callstack_depth+1, "new") << "routine allocated memory from " << alloc << " to " << alloc_max << end();
+
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations")
+ALLOCATE,
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers")
+put(Recipe_ordinal, "allocate", ALLOCATE);
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations")
+case ALLOCATE: {
+  // compute the space we need
+  int size = ingredients.at(0).at(0);
+  int alloc_id = Next_alloc_id;
+  Next_alloc_id++;
+  if (SIZE(ingredients) > 1) {
+    // array allocation
+    trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "array length is " << ingredients.at(1).at(0) << end();
+    size = /*space for length*/1 + size*ingredients.at(1).at(0);
+  }
+  int result = allocate(size);
+  // initialize alloc-id in payload
+  trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "storing alloc-id " << alloc_id << " in location " << result << end();
+  put(Memory, result, alloc_id);
+  if (SIZE(current_instruction().ingredients) > 1) {
+    // initialize array length
+    trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "storing array length " << ingredients.at(1).at(0) << " in location " << result+/*skip alloc id*/1 << end();
+    put(Memory, result+/*skip alloc id*/1, ingredients.at(1).at(0));
+  }
+  products.resize(1);
+  products.at(0).push_back(alloc_id);
+  products.at(0).push_back(result);
+  break;
+}
+:(code)
+int allocate(int size) {
+  // include space for alloc id
+  ++size;
+  trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "allocating size " << size << end();
+//?   Total_alloc += size;
+//?   ++Num_alloc;
+  // Allocate Special-cases
+  // compute the region of memory to return
+  // really crappy at the moment
+  ensure_space(size);
+  const int result = Current_routine->alloc;
+  trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "new alloc: " << result << end();
+  // initialize allocated space
+  for (int address = result;  address < result+size;  ++address) {
+    trace(Callstack_depth+1, "mem") << "storing 0 in location " << address << end();
+    put(Memory, address, 0);
+  }
+  Current_routine->alloc += size;
+  // no support yet for reclaiming memory between routines
+  assert(Current_routine->alloc <= Current_routine->alloc_max);
+  return result;
+}
+
+//: statistics for debugging
+//? :(before "End Globals")
+//? int Total_alloc = 0;
+//? int Num_alloc = 0;
+//? int Total_free = 0;
+//? int Num_free = 0;
+//? :(before "End Reset")
+//? if (!Memory.empty()) {
+//?   cerr << Total_alloc << "/" << Num_alloc
+//?        << " vs " << Total_free << "/" << Num_free << '\n';
+//?   cerr << SIZE(Memory) << '\n';
+//? }
+//? Total_alloc = Num_alloc = Total_free = Num_free = 0;
+
+:(code)
+void ensure_space(int size) {
+  if (size > Initial_memory_per_routine) {
+    cerr << "can't allocate " << size << " locations, that's too much compared to " << Initial_memory_per_routine << ".\n";
+    exit(1);
+  }
+  if (Current_routine->alloc + size > Current_routine->alloc_max) {
+    // waste the remaining space and create a new chunk
+    Current_routine->alloc = Memory_allocated_until;
+    Memory_allocated_until += Initial_memory_per_routine;
+    Current_routine->alloc_max = Memory_allocated_until;
+    trace(Callstack_depth+1, "new") << "routine allocated memory from " << Current_routine->alloc << " to " << Current_routine->alloc_max << end();
+  }
+}
+
+void test_new_initializes() {
+  Memory_allocated_until = 10;
+  put(Memory, Memory_allocated_until, 1);
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 10\n"
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 11\n"
+      "mem: storing 10 in location 2\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_initializes_alloc_id() {
+  Memory_allocated_until = 10;
+  put(Memory, Memory_allocated_until, 1);
+  Next_alloc_id = 23;
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      // initialize memory
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 10\n"
+      "mem: storing 0 in location 11\n"
+      // alloc-id in payload
+      "mem: storing alloc-id 23 in location 10\n"
+      // alloc-id in address
+      "mem: storing 23 in location 1\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_size() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  12:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  20:num/alloc1, 21:num/alloc2 <- deaddress 10:&:num, 12:&:num\n"
+      "  30:num <- subtract 21:num/alloc2, 20:num/alloc1\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      // size of number + alloc id
+      "mem: storing 2 in location 30\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_array_size() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:@:num <- new num:type, 5\n"
+      "  12:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  20:num/alloc1, 21:num/alloc2 <- deaddress 10:&:num, 12:&:num\n"
+      "  30:num <- subtract 21:num/alloc2, 20:num/alloc1\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      // 5 locations for array contents + array length + alloc id
+      "mem: storing 7 in location 30\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_empty_array() {
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:@:num <- new num:type, 0\n"
+      "  12:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  20:num/alloc1, 21:num/alloc2 <- deaddress 10:&:@:num, 12:&:num\n"
+      "  30:num <- subtract 21:num/alloc2, 20:num/alloc1\n"
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "run: {10: (\"address\" \"array\" \"number\")} <- new {num: \"type\"}, {0: \"literal\"}\n"
+      "mem: array length is 0\n"
+      // one location for array length and one for alloc id
+      "mem: storing 2 in location 30\n"
+  );
+}
+
+//: If a routine runs out of its initial allocation, it should allocate more.
+void test_new_overflow() {
+  Initial_memory_per_routine = 3;  // barely enough room for point allocation below
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  10:&:num <- new num:type\n"
+      "  12:&:point <- new point:type\n"  // not enough room in initial page
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "new: routine allocated memory from 1000 to 1003\n"
+      "new: routine allocated memory from 1003 to 1006\n"
+  );
+}
+
+void test_new_without_ingredient() {
+  Hide_errors = true;
+  run(
+      "def main [\n"
+      "  1:&:num <- new\n"  // missing ingredient
+      "]\n"
+  );
+  CHECK_TRACE_CONTENTS(
+      "error: main: 'new' requires one or two ingredients, but got '1:&:num <- new'\n"
+  );
+}
+
+//: a little helper: convert address to number
+
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Declarations")
+DEADDRESS,
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Numbers")
+put(Recipe_ordinal, "deaddress", DEADDRESS);
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Checks")
+case DEADDRESS: {
+  // primary goal of these checks is to forbid address arithmetic
+  for (int i = 0;  i < SIZE(inst.ingredients);  ++i) {
+    if (!is_mu_address(inst.ingredients.at(i))) {
+      raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'deaddress' requires address ingredients, but got '" << inst.ingredients.at(i).original_string << "'\n" << end();
+      goto finish_checking_instruction;
+    }
+  }
+  if (SIZE(inst.products) > SIZE(inst.ingredients)) {
+    raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "too many products in '" << to_original_string(inst) << "'\n" << end();
+    break;
+  }
+  for (int i = 0;  i < SIZE(inst.products);  ++i) {
+    if (!is_real_mu_number(inst.products.at(i))) {
+      raise << maybe(get(Recipe, r).name) << "'deaddress' requires number products, but got '" << inst.products.at(i).original_string << "'\n" << end();
+      goto finish_checking_instruction;
+    }
+  }
+  break;
+}
+:(before "End Primitive Recipe Implementations")
+case DEADDRESS: {
+  products.resize(SIZE(ingredients));
+  for (int i = 0;  i < SIZE(ingredients);  ++i) {
+    products.at(i).push_back(ingredients.at(i).at(/*skip alloc id*/1));
+  }
+  break;
+}