about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/021arithmetic.cc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 1414 - traces now robust to new recipes/typesKartik K. Agaram2015-05-211-52/+0
|
* 1391 - avoid unsigned integersKartik K. Agaram2015-05-171-10/+18
|
* 1363 - rename 'integer' to 'number'Kartik K. Agaram2015-05-131-25/+28
| | | | ..now that we support non-integers.
* 1360 - store doubles in memoryKartik K. Agaram2015-05-121-5/+12
| | | | | | | | | | | | | This is a far cleaner way to provide *some* floating-point support. We can only represent signed integers up to 2^51 rather than 2^63. But in exchange we don't have to worry about it elsewhere, and it's probably faster than checking tag bits in every operation. Hmm, yeah, surprised how easy this was. I think I'll give up on the other approach. I still don't have non-integer literals. But we won't bother with those until we need them. `3.14159:literal` seems ugly.
* 1357 - temporarily revert floating-point supportKartik K. Agaram2015-05-121-218/+16
|
* 1356 - snapshot #2: floating point supportKartik K. Agaram2015-05-121-82/+145
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I added one test to check that divide can return a float, then hacked at the rippling failures across the entire entire codebase until all tests pass. Now I need to look at the changes I made and see if there's a system to them, identify other places that I missed, and figure out the best way to cover all cases. I also need to show real rather than encoded values in the traces, but I can't use value() inside reagent methods because of the name clash with the member variable. So let's take a snapshot before we attempt any refactoring. This was non-trivial to get right. Even if I convince myself that I've gotten it right, I might back this all out if I can't easily *persuade others* that I've gotten it right.
* 1349 - snapshot: floating-point supportKartik K. Agaram2015-05-111-0/+139
|
* 1298 - better ingredient/product handlingKartik K. Agaram2015-05-071-68/+71
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | All primitives now always write to all their products. If a product is not used that's fine, but if an instruction seems to expect too many products mu will complain. In the process, many primitives can operate on more than two ingredients where it seems intuitive. You can add or divide more than two numbers together, copy or negate multiple corresponding locations, etc. There's one remaining bit of ugliness. Some instructions like get/get-address, index/index-address, wait-for-location, these can unnecessarily load values from memory when they don't need to. Useful vim commands: %s/ingredients\[\([^\]]*\)\]/ingredients.at(\1)/gc %s/products\[\([^\]]*\)\]/products.at(\1)/gc .,$s/\[\(.\)]/.at(\1)/gc
* 1276 - make C++ version the defaultKartik K. Agaram2015-05-051-0/+226
I've tried to update the Readme, but there are at least a couple of issues.
1 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461