about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/063wait.cc
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 2864 - replace all address:shared with just addressKartik K. Agaram2016-04-241-10/+12
| | | | | | | Now that we no longer have non-shared addresses, we can just always track refcounts for all addresses. Phew!
* 2859 - rename 'get-address' to 'get-location'Kartik K. Agaram2016-04-231-4/+138
| | | | | | This reinfoces that it's only really intended to be used by 'wait-for-location'. To reinforce that we also move it to the same layer as 'wait-for-location'.
* 2855Kartik K. Agaram2016-04-221-0/+21
|
* 2834 - make 'wait-for-location' more intuitiveKartik K. Agaram2016-04-151-9/+16
| | | | | | | Previously to watch an address we had to perform a lookup of it, which the instruction then proceeded to undo. This way wait-for-instruction no longer supports literal ingredients, but the real-world usage becomes cleaner.
* 2803Kartik K. Agaram2016-03-211-2/+2
| | | | | Show more thorough information about instructions in the trace, but keep the original form in error messages.
* 2773 - switch to 'int'Kartik K. Agaram2016-03-131-9/+9
| | | | This should eradicate the issue of 2771.
* 2735 - define recipes using 'def'Kartik K. Agaram2016-03-081-4/+4
| | | | | | | | | | | | I'm dropping all mention of 'recipe' terminology from the Readme. That way I hope to avoid further bike-shedding discussions while I very slowly decide on the right terminology with my students. I could be smarter in my error messages and use 'recipe' when code uses it and 'function' otherwise. But what about other words like ingredient? It would all add complexity that I'm not yet sure is worthwhile. But I do want separate experiences for veteran programmers reading about Mu on github and for people learning programming using Mu.
* 2712Kartik K. Agaram2016-02-261-3/+3
|
* 2685Kartik K. Agaram2016-02-191-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Stack of plans for cleaning up replace_type_ingredients() and a couple of other things, from main problem to subproblems: include type names in the type_tree rather than in the separate properties vector make type_tree and string_tree real cons cells, with separate leaf nodes redo the vocabulary for dumping various objects: do we really need to_string and debug_string? can we have a version with *all* information? can we have to_string not call debug_string? This commit nibbles at the edges of the final task, switching from member method syntax to global function like almost everything else. I'm mostly using methods just for STL in this project.
* 2562Kartik K. Agaram2016-01-171-2/+2
| | | | | | | | | | | | We want to use the type 'recipe' for recipe *variables*, because it seems nicer to say `recipe number -> number` rather than recipe-ordinal, etc. To support this we'll allow recipe names to be mentioned without any type. This might make a couple of places in this commit more brittle. I'm dropping error messages, causing them to not happen in some situations. Maybe I should just bite the bullet and require an explicit :recipe-literal. We'll see.
* 2561Kartik K. Agaram2016-01-171-0/+167
Reorganize layers in preparation for a better, more type-safe implementation of first-class and higher-order recipes.