| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | 1603 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-19 | 1 | -6/+15 |
| | | |||||
| * | 1602 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-19 | 1 | -21/+31 |
| | | | | | | I forgot to check for nulls before writing prev pointers in doubly linked lists. Tests were accidentally passing. | ||||
| * | 1594 - removing from start/end of duplex list | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -4/+67 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | This uncovers an issue with this interface to duplex lists: the caller needs to check the result and invalidate any other pointers if it's null (i.e. the list is now empty) We *could* try to encapsulate the list in a header to help the caller manage header pointers. But heck, let's see if writing tests helps call-sites stay on the straight and narrow. | ||||
| * | 1593 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -0/+75 |
| | | |||||
| * | 1592 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -0/+36 |
| | | |||||
| * | 1591 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -3/+43 |
| | | |||||
| * | 1590 - inserting into doubly linked list | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -0/+62 |
| | | |||||
| * | 1589 - doubly linked list | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-06-18 | 1 | -0/+74 |