about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/068random.mu
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 4134 - 'input' = 'ingredient'Kartik K. Agaram2017-12-031-6/+6
|
* 3827Kartik K. Agaram2017-04-181-0/+1
|
* 3656Kartik K. Agaram2016-11-101-1/+1
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | Periodic cleanup to replace 'reply' with 'return' everywhere in the repo. I use 'reply' for students to help reinforce the metaphor of function calls as being like messages through a pipe. But that causes 'reply' to get into my muscle memory when writing Mu code for myself, and I worry that that makes Mu seem unnecessarily alien to anybody reading on Github. Perhaps I should just give it up? I'll try using 'return' with my next student.
* 3537Kartik K. Agaram2016-10-201-0/+19
|
* 3390Kartik K. Agaram2016-09-171-1/+1
|
* 3389Kartik K. Agaram2016-09-171-4/+4
|
* 3386Kartik K. Agaram2016-09-171-7/+7
|
* 3385Kartik K. Agaram2016-09-171-11/+11
|
* 3157 - more testable 'random' interfaceKartik K. Agaram2016-07-271-0/+55
Shouldn't break any existing programs using 'random'.