Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 2442 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-11-15 | 1 | -2/+1 |
| | | | | | | Fix the drawback in the previous commit: if an ingredient is just a literal 0 we'll skip its type-checking and hope to map type ingredients elsewhere. | ||||
* | 2441 - never miss any specializations | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-11-15 | 1 | -9/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | | I was failing to specialize calls containing literals. And then I had to deal with whether literals should map to numbers or characters. (Answer: both.) One of the issues that still remains: shape-shifting recipes can't be called with literals for addresses, even if it's 0. | ||||
* | 2430 - make room for more transforms | Kartik K. Agaram | 2015-11-13 | 1 | -0/+62 |