mu - Soul of a tiny new machine. More thorough tests → More comprehensible and rewrite-friendly software → More resilient society.

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	mu.subx: 21 failing tests remaining	Kartik Agaram	2020-05-20	1	-1/+1
\|
*	yet another 'get' variant	Kartik Agaram	2020-05-18	1	-0/+318
\|
*	table primitives working	Kartik Agaram	2020-05-18	1	-260/+400
\| \| \| \|	$ ./translate_subx init.linux 0*.subx && ./a.elf test
*	6182 - start of support for safe handles	Kartik Agaram	2020-04-03	1	-12/+12
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	So far it's unclear how to do this in a series of small commits. Still nibbling around the edges. In this commit we standardize some terminology: The length of an array or stream is denominated in the high-level elements. The _size_ is denominated in bytes. The thing we encode into the type is always the size, not the length. There's still an open question of what to do about the Mu `length` operator. I'd like to modify it to provide the length. Currently it provides the size. If I can't fix that I'll rename it.
*	6181	Kartik Agaram	2020-04-03	1	-43/+44
\|
*	5924	Kartik Agaram	2020-01-27	1	-45/+45
\|
*	5897 - rename comparison instructions	Kartik Agaram	2020-01-16	1	-18/+18
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	Signed and unsigned don't quite capture the essence of what the different combinations of x86 flags are doing for SubX. The crucial distinction is that one set of comparison operators is for integers and the second is for addresses.
*	5883 - drop the `ref` keyword	Kartik Agaram	2020-01-12	1	-17/+17
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	When I created it I was conflating two things: a) needing to refer to just the start, rather than the whole, and b) counting indirections. Both are kinda ill-posed. Now Mu will have just `addr` and `handle` types. Normal types will translate implicitly to `addr` types, while `handle` will always require explicit handling.
*	5876 - address -> addr	Kartik Agaram	2020-01-03	1	-30/+30
\|
*	5804	Kartik Agaram	2019-12-08	1	-61/+62
\| \| \| \| \|	Try to make the comments consistent with the type system we'll eventually have.
*	5790	Kartik Agaram	2019-12-05	1	-4/+4
\| \| \| \| \| \|	Standardize conventions for labels within objects in the data segment. We're going to use this in a new tool.
*	5778	Kartik Agaram	2019-11-29	1	-18/+18
\|
*	5714	Kartik Agaram	2019-10-25	1	-8/+4
\| \| \| \|	Replace calculations of constants with labels.
*	5698	Kartik Agaram	2019-10-15	1	-32/+32
\| \| \| \|	Thanks Andrew Owen for reporting this typo.
*	5675 - move helpers from subx-common into layers	Kartik Agaram	2019-09-19	1	-0/+1696
	This undoes 5672 in favor of a new plan: Layers 000 - 099 are for running without syntax sugar. We use them for building syntax-sugar passes. Layers 100 and up are for running with all syntax sugar. The layers are arranged in approximate order so more phases rely on earlier layers than later ones. I plan to not use intermediate syntax sugar (just sigils without calls, or sigils and calls without braces) anywhere except in the specific passes implementing them.