| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Have $print in console mode rotate through the screen rather than simply
block at the bottom.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Experimental: kinda support $print in console mode.
It's not perfect and probably will never be, because 'cout' buffers
differently from termbox primitives, which can cause console-aware
newlines to show up before other (console-oblivious) prints, like in
this example program:
def main [
open-console
$print [abc], 10/newline
$print [def], 10/newline
wait-for-some-interaction
close-console
]
And then there's the problem that there's no way for cout to update
Display_column. So mixing $print and print will be confusing.
Perhaps we should just not mess with Display_* variables inside $print?
But then we'll only ever be able to see a single line of $print at a
time.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Toss out Scenario_names. It's only checking if we load duplicate
scenarios, and we have independent checks for *running* duplicate
scenarios.
This has the salubrious effect of also allowing lessons to contain
regular text scenarios interspersed with their recipes.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Thanks Ella Couch for running into this source of crashes.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm going to focus on two projects for a while:
a) the testable interface for file system and network
b) a compiler translating some language to x86
b) might require first gaining some experience programming in Assembly.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Shouldn't break any existing programs using 'random'.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Make 'stream' generic.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Fix a bug in phase ordering discovered while trying to stash cells in
the lambda compiler.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Rewrite ingredients for 'trace' instructions just like 'stash'
instructions.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks Stephen Malina for helping run into this hole in support for
compound types.
When I created that assert (commit 2381, Nov 2015) I was thinking only
of type ingredients, and didn't realize that compound types could have
internal nodes with zero values.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Manual tests for parse errors because scenarios can't handle assertion
failures yet.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Complicated logic to not run core tests. I only want to disable core
tests if:
a) I'm changing CFLAGS on the commandline (usually to disable
optimizations, causing tests to run slower in a debug cycle)
b) I'm not printing a help message (either with just 'mu' or
'mu --help')
c) I'm loading other files besides just the core.
Under these circumstances I only want to run tests in the files
explicitly loaded at the commandline.
This is all pretty hairy, in spite of my attempts to document it in
four different places. I might end up taking it all out the first time I
need to run core tests under all these conditions.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Parsing pairs of atoms.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Don't die if an instruction accidentally has too many products.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reorganize parser to make room for parsing pairs. But first test for
pairs is still failing.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Handle multi-character atoms.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Degenerate 'parser' that handles just atoms of one character.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Reorganize data structure for lambda cells. Create our first real unit
test for the compiler in the process.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Bugfix: permit dummy product when trying to convert exclusive
containers. The 'status' product is still required, however. Without it
there's no point to calling 'maybe-convert'.
|
| |
|
|
| |
More accurate count of failing tests.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Nothing runs yet. Just spewing out code at this point, as a kind of
sketching.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Always show instruction before any transforms in error messages.
This is likely going to make some errors unclear because they *need* to
show the original instruction. But if we don't have tests for those
situations did they ever really work?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Warn if 'put' or 'put-index' has a mismatch in the type of the product,
not just the name. It won't do any harm, but could be misleading to a
later reader. In both instructions, the product is just for
documentation.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Failures in scenarios should consistently trigger the summary message
showing number of failed tests.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|