| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
For example usage of file operations, see filesystem.mu.
Is it ugly that we don't actually write to disk unless we wait for the
writing routine to exit? Maybe there's a nice way to wrap it. At any
rate, all buffering is explicit, which seems a win compared to *nix.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Commit 3191 stopped defining _XOPEN_SOURCE when building termbox/ to get
Mu to build on OpenBSD. However, that had the side effect of not
declaring the prototype for wcwidth() on some versions of Linux. Ugh.
Just hack around this morass.
In general the direction we want to go in Mu is fewer feature #defines.
At least explicit ones. Should be an internal detail of the underlying
platform our code shouldn't have to worry about. If headers don't
cooperate, just start explicitly declaring prototypes and damn the
consequences.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Trying keeping html in the master branch:
https://github.com/blog/2228-simpler-github-pages-publishing
Let's see if https://akkartik.github.io/mu updates after I push this
commit to just the master branch.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix CI. Scenario size_of_shape_shifting_exclusive_container was
triggering undefined behavior in tangle/ and causing things to break in
some compilers but not others.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix a new warning from Perl.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Another hole in refcount management, which I noticed while doing commit
3202, and thinking about which led to the insight of commit 3212.
Now the summary of commit 3197 is modified to this:
Update refcounts of products after every instruction, EXCEPT:
a) when instruction is a non-primitive and the callee starts with
'local-scope' (because it's already not decremented in 'return')
OR:
b) when instruction is primitive 'next-ingredient' or
'next-ingredient-without-typechecking', and its result is saved to a
variable in the default space (because it's already incremented at
the time of the call)
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When updating refcounts for a typed segment of memory being copied over
with another, we were only ever using the new copy's data to determine
any tags for exclusive containers. Looks like the right way to do
refcounts is to increment and decrement separately.
Hopefully this is a complete fix for the intermittent but
non-deterministic errors we've been encountering while running the edit/
app.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Thanks Ella Couch; this was long overdue.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix CI.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This commit was written by Stephen Malina. Thanks also to Stephen for
running into the bug of commit 3202.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When you pass an ingredient to a recipe using 'start-running' it mostly
behaves identically to performing a regular function call. However, if
the calling function completed before the new routine had a chance to
run, the ingredients passed in ran the risk of being reclaimed.
In response, let's always increment refcounts at the time of a function
call rather than when the ingredients are read inside the callee.
Now the summary of commit 3197 is modified to this:
Update refcounts of products after every instruction, EXCEPT:
a) when instruction is a non-primitive and the callee starts with
'local-scope' (because it's already not decremented in 'return')
OR:
b) when instruction is primitive 'next-ingredient' or
'next-ingredient-without-typechecking'
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Never mind, just close your nose and replace that function parameter
with a global variable.
This may not always be the solution for the problem of layers being
unable to add parameters and arguments, but here it works well and it's
unclear what problems the global might cause.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Replace an integer with a boolean across two layers of function calls.
It has long been one of the ugliest consequences of my approach with
layers that functions might need to be introduced with unnecessary
arguments simply because we have no clean way to add parameters to a
function definition after the fact -- or to add the default argument
corresponding to that parameter in calls. This problem is exacerbated by
the redundant argument having to be passed in through multiple layers of
functions. In this instance:
In layer 20 we define write_memory with an argument called
'saving_instruction_products' which isn't used yet.
In layer 36 we reveal that we use this argument in a call to
should_update_refcounts_in_write_memory() -- where it is again not used
yet.
Layer 43 finally clarifies what we're shooting for:
a) In general when we need to update some memory, we always want to
update refcounts.
b) The only exception is when we're reclaiming locals in a function
that set up its stack frame using 'local-scope' (signalling that it
wants immediate reclamation). At that point we avoid decrementing
refcounts of 'escaping' addresses that are being returned, and we also
avoid incrementing refcounts of products in the caller instruction.
The latter case is basically why we need this boolean and its dance
across 3 layers.
In summary, write_memory() needs to update refcounts except if:
we're writing products for an instruction,
the instruction is not a primitive, and
the (callee) recipe for the instruction starts with 'local-scope'.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Bugfix: 'restart' should never restart completed routines. They will
often have nothing to run.
I ran into this while considering whether 'read' on channels to return
true on success or failure. Switching from 'fail?' to 'success?'
crashed. But now that it's fixed I think I'll keep things the way they
are. No reason to be consistent with 'next-ingredient' and have the
status be true to signal success.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Looks like the _XOPEN_SOURCE #define isn't needed in termbox anymore, at
least after I removed some features from it that I don't need. All it
was doing is hiding SIGWINCH and likely other names as well.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I'm seeing *extremely* rare crashes due to some problem with negative
refcounts in the edit/ app. It's not using any concurrency at all, so
that's not the issue. Setting a tripwire to try and catch it. I'm going
to run:
mu --trace edit
..all the time for a while. And periodically restart when the trace
makes the program too sluggish to continue.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Fix CI. How does it work on my Mac without explicitly including errno?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
- New plan
Primitives:
$open-file-for-reading
$open-file-for-writing
$read-from-file
$write-to-file
$close-file
The '$' prefix indicates that none of these are intended to be used
directly since they rely on type-system-busting numbers. Also that they
are just temporary hacks depending on primitives provided by the host
system. A putative 'Mu machine' would have very different primitives.
Testable interfaces:
- start-reading: starts a routine to read from a file and returns the
source where the contents will become available.
- start-writing: starts a routine to write to a file and returns the
sink where the contents can be provided.
Both operate on the real file-system if the first 'filesystem'
ingredient is 0.
Once you start them up you can read/write/close the channel as usual.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I don't know why this took so long to gel. I just needed to copy my
approach to screen management:
1. primitives layer (C++): simple, non-testable, non-safe operations.
2. wrappers layer (Mu): wrap operations with dependency-injected
versions that can take a fake file system.
3. scenario layer (C++): implement assume-filesystem that constructs a
fake file system.
4. scenario test layer (Mu): test out assume-filesystem in a test.
This commit implements step 1.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
Systematize all the newlines while displaying test progress.
|