about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 5875Kartik Agaram2020-01-0216-56/+207
|
* 5874Kartik Agaram2020-01-021-7/+1
|
* 5873Kartik Agaram2020-01-023-29/+25
|
* 5872Kartik Agaram2020-01-023-8/+21
|
* 5871Kartik Agaram2020-01-021-2/+2
|
* 5870Kartik Agaram2020-01-021-0/+3
|
* 5869Kartik Agaram2020-01-021-7/+8
|
* 5868Kartik Agaram2020-01-024-0/+0
| | | | | Follow stupid GNU convention, because why not: https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Releases.html
* 5867Kartik Agaram2020-01-021-6/+4
|
* 5866Kartik Agaram2020-01-022-1/+4
| | | | | | | | Stop requiring '--debug' in 'bootstrap run'. Now it's smart enough to turn on when needed. This creates some small chance of reading stale debug info for the wrong binary, but in practice that hasn't been an issue.
* 5865Kartik Agaram2020-01-0220-119/+119
| | | | Give the bootstrap C++ program a less salient name.
* 5864Kartik Agaram2020-01-022-2/+2
|
* 5863Kartik Agaram2020-01-025-102/+25
| | | | | | | | | Just clarified for myself why `subx translate` and `subx run` need to share code: emulation supports the tests first and foremost. In the process we clean up our architecture for levels of layers. It's a good idea but unused once we reconceive of "level 1" as just part of the test harness.
* 5862Kartik Agaram2020-01-012-164/+172
| | | | | Deemphasize details of x86 addressing modes. I want people using SubX's syntax sugar now.
* 5861 - describe Mu language in the ReadmeKartik Agaram2020-01-013-987/+42
|
* 5860Kartik Agaram2020-01-011-0/+17
|
* 5859Kartik Agaram2020-01-013-6/+5
| | | | Move script to create a Linux-based boot image into a sub-directory.
* 5858Kartik Agaram2020-01-0197-10/+8
| | | | | | Move script to create a Soso boot image into a sub-directory. I'm trying to streamline newcomer attention to just a couple of use cases.
* 5857Kartik Agaram2020-01-012-26/+26
|
* 5856Kartik Agaram2020-01-0143-98/+89
|
* 5855Kartik Agaram2020-01-016-4664/+5051
|
* 5854Kartik Agaram2020-01-011-1/+1
|
* 5853Kartik Agaram2020-01-013-135/+0
|
* 5852Kartik Agaram2020-01-01232-3/+3
|
* 5851Kartik Agaram2020-01-0110-20/+22
| | | | | | | | | | | | Rename a few scripts to be more consistent. I'm also starting to feel the urge to bud off `subx run` into its own program, say tools/emulate_x86. It doesn't really rely on the SubX notation at all. And then I could rename `subx translate` to `translate_subx_bootstrap`. Only problem: the commands in the Readme get verbose. But the Readme is gonna need surgery soon anyway to put translate_mu front and center.
* 5850 - driver script for translating Mu programsKartik Agaram2020-01-013-0/+69
|
* 5849 - more integration testing of function callsKartik Agaram2020-01-012-7/+98
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | I can now run this program: fn main -> result/ebx: int { result <- do-add 3 4 } fn do-add a: int, b: int -> result/ebx: int { result <- copy a result <- add b } We still can't define local variables, but can write any programs involving ints by passing in enough arguments for temporaries.
* 5848Kartik Agaram2020-01-011-5/+5
|
* 5847 - literal inputsKartik Agaram2019-12-3116-1/+308
|
* 5846Kartik Agaram2019-12-301-10/+10
|
* 5845Kartik Agaram2019-12-301-0/+3
|
* 5844Kartik Agaram2019-12-301-3/+3
| | | | | Let's start putting r32 first in compare instructions that need it. Ordering there is quite subtle and of great import.
* 5843Kartik Agaram2019-12-291-1/+1
|
* 5842Kartik Agaram2019-12-291-0/+44
| | | | | | Extremely crappy syntax highlighting for Emacs. I just can't wrap my head around elisp, and I'm inclined to blame elisp. Checking this off my todo list and moving on.
* 5841 - rudimentary syntax highlighting for geditKartik Agaram2019-12-281-0/+29
|
* 5840 - syntax highlighting for nano (!!)Kartik Agaram2019-12-281-0/+16
|
* 5839 - colors for comments and string literalsKartik Agaram2019-12-282-1/+32
|
* 5838 - syntax highlighting for atomKartik Agaram2019-12-284-0/+63
|
* 5837 - better colors for trace browserKartik Agaram2019-12-281-10/+25
|
* 5836Kartik Agaram2019-12-281-1/+1
|
* 5835Kartik Agaram2019-12-2819-3787/+4858
|
* 5834Kartik Agaram2019-12-272-3/+4
| | | | Bugfix.
* 5833Kartik Agaram2019-12-271-1/+1
|
* 5832 - support for function outputsKartik Agaram2019-12-272-14/+138
| | | | | | | | | | | We haven't implemented it yet, but there's now a design for how we check whether a function has written its output correctly. Functions must write to each output at the top level at least once, and never overwrite an output register in the top-level once it's been defined. This is conservative (it can be perfectly reasonable for functions to write the output, reuse the register for a temporary, and then write the output again) but easy to check.
* 5831Kartik Agaram2019-12-272-27/+38
|
* 5830Kartik Agaram2019-12-262-1/+5
| | | | | Bugfix: statements defining a new register variable require an initializer instruction.
* 5829Kartik Agaram2019-12-261-5/+15
|
* 5828 - copy (mov) instructionsKartik Agaram2019-12-262-22/+144
|
* 5827 - give primitives one more bit of metadataKartik Agaram2019-12-262-4/+59
| | | | | Copy (mov) instructions are unlike instructions we've encoded so far, in that their destination is not read.
* 5826 - done with basic binary opsKartik Agaram2019-12-262-0/+197
|