Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | 7294 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-28 | 3 | -54/+54 |
| | |||||
* | 7293 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-28 | 1 | -240/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 7292 - mu.subx: loosen copy-byte checks a bit | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 3 | -128/+34 |
| | | | | | | | Without this there's no way to convert an int to a byte. And that feels too restrictive, and gives up a lot of safe things one might want to do with bytes. (Such as divide a number by 10 and emit the remainder as a byte.) | ||||
* | 7291 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 2 | -12/+11 |
| | |||||
* | 7290 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 4 | -103/+23 |
| | | | | | | | I've wrestled for a long time with how to support integer division with its hard-coded registers. The answer's always been staring me in the face: just turn it into a function! We already expect function outputs to go to hard-coded registers. | ||||
* | 7289 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 1 | -0/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 7288 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 1 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 7287 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 2 | -0/+34 |
| | | | | | Regression: I'd broken compare on bytes. Apparently I took away support for bytes from numberlike-output even though I didn't need to by the end. | ||||
* | 7286 - mu.subx: isolate bytes from previous values | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-27 | 4 | -14/+70 |
| | |||||
* | 7285 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -12/+1042 |
| | |||||
* | 7284 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -12/+188 |
| | |||||
* | 7283 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -98/+12 |
| | |||||
* | 7282 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -0/+86 |
| | |||||
* | 7281 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -7/+24 |
| | |||||
* | 7280 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -9/+9 |
| | |||||
* | 7279 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -1/+44 |
| | |||||
* | 7278 - typo in mu.subx | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 3 | -4/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 7277 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 1 | -84/+55 |
| | |||||
* | 7276 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -108/+25 |
| | |||||
* | 7275 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-26 | 2 | -0/+0 |
| | |||||
* | 7274 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-25 | 1 | -7/+11 |
| | | | | | Fix a bug in whole integer support. And we'll forget about compressing large integers into scientific notation for now. | ||||
* | 7273 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-25 | 1 | -40/+85 |
| | | | | | | | A wishlist of passing tests. Let's see how the naive algorithm at http://www.ryanjuckett.com/programming/printing-floating-point-numbers does. | ||||
* | 7272 - snapshot: printing floats in decimal | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-25 | 3 | -5/+379 |
| | | | | | | I've made some progress to where I can print whole integers right. But this whole approach of mixing decimals with binary exponents is going to be super confusing. I need to bite the bullet and just use decimal exponents. | ||||
* | 7271 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-25 | 1 | -7/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 7270 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-21 | 1 | -5/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 7269 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-21 | 3 | -55/+45 |
| | |||||
* | 7268 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-20 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 7267 - mu.subx: type-check 'convert' statements | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-20 | 4 | -21700/+22924 |
| | |||||
* | 7266 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 2 | -12/+12 |
| | |||||
* | 7265 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 1 | -2/+2 |
| | |||||
* | 7264 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 1 | -3/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 7263 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 1 | -3/+4 |
| | |||||
* | 7262 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 6 | -28501/+28788 |
| | |||||
* | 7261 - mu.subx: array bounds-checking done | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 5 | -107/+333 |
| | |||||
* | 7260 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 2 | -15/+11 |
| | | | | This seems to preserve the intent of commit 6555. | ||||
* | 7259 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 2 | -5/+6 |
| | |||||
* | 7258 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 2 | -9/+9 |
| | |||||
* | 7257 - partially undo commit 7253 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 2 | -8/+8 |
| | | | | I don't need to pass the function pointer quite so low. I think.. | ||||
* | 7256 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 1 | -6/+6 |
| | |||||
* | 7255 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | |||||
* | 7254 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-17 | 3 | -3/+5 |
| | |||||
* | 7253 - mu.subx: starting to bounds-check 'index' | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-16 | 2 | -50/+51 |
| | | | | | First step: start passing the function name into code-generation functions. We're going to need it for the error message. | ||||
* | 7252 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-16 | 19 | -1445/+1445 |
| | |||||
* | 7251 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-16 | 4 | -50/+53 |
| | |||||
* | 7250 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-16 | 6 | -25/+17 |
| | |||||
* | 7249 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-15 | 15 | -35694/+36870 |
| | |||||
* | 7248 - mu.subx: new primitive 'clear-object' | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-15 | 5 | -17/+155 |
| | |||||
* | 7247 | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-15 | 2 | -11/+64 |
| | |||||
* | 7246 - tile: segment each function's area | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-15 | 1 | -2/+14 |
| | |||||
* | 7245 - tile: right-align functions | Kartik Agaram | 2020-11-15 | 3 | -13/+102 |
| |