| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ... | ||||||
| * | 4083 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 4 | -2/+120 | |
| | | | | | subx: 'pop' | |||||
| * | 4082 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 4 | -55/+67 | |
| | | | | | | subx: correct a 'copy' ('mov') instruction as well to get its operand right from the opcode. | |||||
| * | 4081 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 2 | -238/+230 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4080 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 2 | -17/+29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | subx: correct 'push' register. It gets its operand right from the opcode, not a new modrm byte. Have I misinterpreted any other instructions in this manner (`+rd` in the Intel manual)? | |||||
| * | 4079 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-18 | 6 | -33/+183 | |
| | | | | | subx: 'pop' | |||||
| * | 4078 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 7 | -450/+454 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4077 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-17 | 6 | -33/+33 | |
| | | | | | | Stop hyperlinking every `i` in subx html files to the integer register union. | |||||
| * | 4076 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 1 | -1/+1 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4075 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 1 | -3/+4 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4074 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 1 | -6/+10 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4073 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 1 | -4/+7 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4072 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 6 | -68/+667 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4071 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-16 | 3 | -46/+510 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | subx: conditional jump instructions Lots of boilerplate here. This commit really strains my 'copyista' ethic. But I think it's still clearer to see each instruction implemented independently than to try to create a macro or something like that. | |||||
| * | 4070 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 1 | -0/+11 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4069 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 7 | -221/+383 | |
| | | | | | subx: unconditional 'jump' | |||||
| * | 4068 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 2 | -6/+6 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4067 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-15 | 6 | -6/+184 | |
| | | | | | subx: 'mov' | |||||
| * | 4066 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 4 | -4/+4 | |
| | | | | | | | I spent a while spelunking into the code generated by C compilers before realizing that ignoring the order of arguments for 'cmp' instructions clarifies everything. | |||||
| * | 4065 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 6 | -0/+456 | |
| | | | | | | | subx: 'compare' Hopefully I've implemented the 'sense' of comparisons right.. | |||||
| * | 4064 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 9 | -519/+477 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4063 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-14 | 4 | -8/+8 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4062 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 5 | -252/+260 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4061 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 4 | -18/+18 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4060 - subx: correct stale Readme | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 1 | -7/+1 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4059 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 3 | -242/+609 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4058 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 2 | -0/+38 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4057 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 3 | -0/+111 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4056 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 3 | -0/+111 | |
| | | | | | subx: 'or' | |||||
| * | 4055 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-13 | 3 | -0/+105 | |
| | | | | | subx: Implement 'and' for the addressing modes we've built so far. | |||||
| * | 4054 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 10 | -371/+375 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4053 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 4 | -10/+10 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4052 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 10 | -140/+1949 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4051 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 3 | -74/+74 | |
| | | | | | subx: Move register direct mode before indirect in the exposition. | |||||
| * | 4050 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+18 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4049 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 3 | -99/+101 | |
| | | | | | Instead of organizing layers by instruction, do so by addressing mode. | |||||
| * | 4048 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+22 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4047 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+22 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4046 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+12 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4045 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -3/+24 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4044 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -2/+18 | |
| | | | | | subx: now starting on subtraction instructions. | |||||
| * | 4043 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -2/+25 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4042 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -4/+15 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4041 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+4 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4040 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -3/+37 | |
| | | | | | | | | subx: add immediate First example of a more complex opcode that needs to do its own decoding to decide what instruction to run. | |||||
| * | 4039 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -3/+3 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4038 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -8/+10 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4037 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 2 | -12/+15 | |
| | | | | | Fix non-standard switch statement. | |||||
| * | 4036 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -6/+6 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4035 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 1 | -0/+3 | |
| | | ||||||
| * | 4034 | Kartik K. Agaram | 2017-10-12 | 3 | -0/+58 | |
| | | | | | Start implementing core x86 addressing mode decoding. | |||||