| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Signed and unsigned don't quite capture the essence of what the different
combinations of x86 flags are doing for SubX. The crucial distinction is
that one set of comparison operators is for integers and the second is
for addresses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
When I created it I was conflating two things:
a) needing to refer to just the start, rather than the whole, and
b) counting indirections.
Both are kinda ill-posed. Now Mu will have just `addr` and `handle` types.
Normal types will translate implicitly to `addr` types, while `handle`
will always require explicit handling.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Try to make the comments consistent with the type system we'll eventually
have.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Clean up pseudocode to match planned syntax for the type- and memory-safe
level-2 Mu language.
http://akkartik.name/post/mu-2019-2 is already out of date.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Thanks Andrew Owen for reporting this typo.
|
|
|
|
| |
Get mulisp reflecting whatever's typed in again.
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This undoes 5672 in favor of a new plan:
Layers 000 - 099 are for running without syntax sugar. We use them for
building syntax-sugar passes.
Layers 100 and up are for running with all syntax sugar.
The layers are arranged in approximate order so more phases rely on earlier
layers than later ones.
I plan to not use intermediate syntax sugar (just sigils without calls,
or sigils and calls without braces) anywhere except in the specific passes
implementing them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Snapshot of mulisp before we put it on the back-burner. It's going to take
too long, and we're better off building out the lower layers that make
it more convenient to create.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|