about summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/baremetal/115write-byte.subx
Commit message (Collapse)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* 7842 - new directory organizationKartik K. Agaram2021-03-031-82/+0
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Baremetal is now the default build target and therefore has its sources at the top-level. Baremetal programs build using the phase-2 Mu toolchain that requires a Linux kernel. This phase-2 codebase which used to be at the top-level is now under the linux/ directory. Finally, the phase-2 toolchain, while self-hosting, has a way to bootstrap from a C implementation, which is now stored in linux/bootstrap. The bootstrap C implementation uses some literate programming tools that are now in linux/bootstrap/tools. So the whole thing has gotten inverted. Each directory should build one artifact and include the main sources (along with standard library). Tools used for building it are relegated to sub-directories, even though those tools are often useful in their own right, and have had lots of interesting programs written using them. A couple of things have gotten dropped in this process: - I had old ways to run on just a Linux kernel, or with a Soso kernel. No more. - I had some old tooling for running a single test at the cursor. I haven't used that lately. Maybe I'll bring it back one day. The reorg isn't done yet. Still to do: - redo documentation everywhere. All the README files, all other markdown, particularly vocabulary.md. - clean up how-to-run comments at the start of programs everywhere - rethink what to do with the html/ directory. Do we even want to keep supporting it? In spite of these shortcomings, all the scripts at the top-level, linux/ and linux/bootstrap are working. The names of the scripts also feel reasonable. This is a good milestone to take stock at.
* 7817Kartik K. Agaram2021-02-271-0/+2
| | | | | Detour: writing float to stream. In the process I found a bug at the SubX layer X-(
* 7693 - baremetal: pass background color everywhereKartik Agaram2021-02-071-1/+1
|
* 7547 - baremetal: rpn calculatorKartik Agaram2021-01-221-1/+1
| | | | | | | | Still in progress. Known bugs: * Cursor management is broken. Every line currently seems to leave behind a shadow cursor. * No shift-key support yet, which means no addition or multiplication. (This app doesn't have division yet.)
* 7524 - bring back some abort messagesKartik Agaram2021-01-151-1/+8
| | | | | | | | | | | Our infrastructure for displaying errors is far more rudimentary in baremetal. Many ways things can go wrong. But making the attempt seems better than not. I'm also making some effort to keep it easy to see what has been copied over from the top-level, by not modifying copied code to use syntax sugar and so on. It may not be an important enough reason to mix notations in a single file.
* 7523Kartik Agaram2021-01-151-0/+5
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | There's a dependency cycle here: - draw-grapheme (Mu) uses read-grapheme (Mu) to be unicode-aware. - read-grapheme uses read-byte (SubX). Streams are a fundamental data structure in Mu. For the Mu compiler to be able to reason about the safety of stream operations, they need to be an opaque type. All stream primitives are written in SubX. To manipulate a stream's internals we force people to reach for SubX. That way if there's no SubX code there's confidence that things are safe. - read-byte and other stream operations have unit tests, like they should. The unit tests need to print data to screen when say a test fails. To do this they use various check- functions (SubX) that take a string argument. - Printing a string to screen uses draw-grapheme (Mu). Perhaps I should maintain variants of drawing primitives that operate only on ASCII.
* 7522 - bring back a few tests in .subx filesKartik Agaram2021-01-151-0/+30
| | | | | | | | Even though baremetal has tests in SubX, they can only run in Mu programs since the test harness is currently in a Mu layer. Baremetal isn't really intended for running SubX programs at the moment. Is this a step down the slippery slope towards C compilers that I complained about in http://akkartik.name/akkartik-convivial-20200607.pdf?
* 7518Kartik Agaram2021-01-131-0/+1
|
* 7492Kartik Agaram2021-01-091-0/+37
Port some support for unicode to baremetal.