| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| * | made first compute-offset test pass | nc | 2019-07-07 | 1 | -0/+1 |
| | | |||||
| * | 5133 - show instruction source in trace | Kartik Agaram | 2019-04-28 | 1 | -4/+10 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | It's a little hacky in some corner cases. In particular, if debug information isn't available the trace will contain duplicated lines. This is because I don't want the core trace lines all my tests rely on (introduced in the 'vm' layer) to have to know about debug info (introduced in the 'labels' and 'debug' layers). Thanks Charles Saternos for the feedback and suggestion! | ||||
| * | 4987 - support `browse_trace` tool in SubX | Kartik Agaram | 2019-02-25 | 1 | -0/+546 |
| I've extracted it into a separate binary, independent of my Mu prototype. I also cleaned up my tracing layer to be a little nicer. Major improvements: - Realized that incremental tracing really ought to be the default. And to minimize printing traces to screen. - Finally figured out how to combine layers and call stack frames in a single dimension of depth. The answer: optimize for the experience of `browse_trace`. Instructions occupy a range of depths based on their call stack frame, and minor details of an instruction lie one level deeper in each case. Other than that, I spent some time adjusting levels everywhere to make `browse_trace` useful. | |||||